Jess is a 26/28. She’s very indenial about it thoughJust had a look at the new ITS stuff - Jess is wearing a size 28 in all the dresses. So what size is she??
It's just annoying because she claims to be one size and then is modelling in another size! I'm sure she was wearing size 28 in the first lot of SS range but then it changed to say she was wearing size 24!Jess is a 26/28. She’s very indenial about it though
She looks like a 28/30. She’s definitely gotten larger, I can’t see any weight loss at all! Her gunt just sticks out and she’s eating so shit plus all that alcohol is obviously going straight to her gunt
Wow, a lot of them look like tents, so I'd have thought she could have worn a smaller size.Just had a look at the new ITS stuff - Jess is wearing a size 28 in all the dresses. So what size is she??
That's fair enough, I can go up 2 or 3 sizes in boohooTo be fair to Jess I’m a very similar size and shape and I wear a 24/26 in ASOS, m&s, yours... better quality places, but boohoo, in the style etc a 28 can be too small. They’re awful quality and totally not thought out when designing, they just cut patterns to a bigger size not thinking about the fact that fat girls have belly’s, or that the volume of your body increases when you sit down for example. ASOS do a better job at designing seperate items and taking into account that arms are bigger at the top of your not a waif size 6 etc.
It’s clear that she had sized up for this photo shoot as everything fitted much better than last time.Just had a look at the new ITS stuff - Jess is wearing a size 28 in all the dresses. So what size is she??
She's full of shit that girl they get to review the clothes. She's supposed to be honest, but says everything from ITS is great and she loves it so much.Just seen this in regards to sizing
Just been having a look.
They have defo photoshopped her belly in the first pic. The second pic you can see it from the back!
And the third pic the bloody tan again. Whyyyy
Her chin is growing by the day - I’d be so upset with those photos, they seem to have a particular talent of making her look horrific and editing to smooth which isn’t very on brand for JessView attachment 642405
I’m sorry but that photographer needs sacked. Surely anyone can see that is not a good angle.
I suppose we get a glimpse of her real size here though and not the size we see through her insta.I’m sorry but that photographer needs sacked. Surely anyone can see that is not a good angle.
OMFG! That outfit is far too small for her, she looks so uncomfortableYou really would think the photographer would have seen the likes of this from the first shoot and tried not shooting the pictures from so low. View attachment 642413
If they want to sell the range to the higher end of their plus size customers very few of the photos of Jess do that in either of Staceys collections!x
Yeah those pics are terrible, not good when you’re trying to sell to plus size ladies, the clothes look awful!In the “what I wore in a week” reel she did, on the Monday in the black leggings/black jumper/white socks combo I thought she looked a bit slimmer, then the angles on these make her look horrific and bigger than ever - I know in any online presence there’s always some smoke and mirrors (I’m a big girl and only ever like photos taken from “up high”) but there’s angles and then there’s these angles!!! Some of the Yours dresses were so much more flattering than anything ITS I’ve seen her modelling, same with the Donald Stanley shoot, and I think it’s part the fit/part the photographer (and part terrible lifestyle, especially since she left the bank).x
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?