I really do think this is at the heart of it all @rage naan and you’ve pinpointed exactly her problem: that so many addictions are publicly admissible because they’re ultimately attributable to the substance itself, and therefore “forgivable”, whilst an addiction to shopping carries a higher level of shame around self-control.I've said this before but I think her real addiction is shopping and almost everything else is to cover that. I'm sure there was/is problem drinking and other substance abuse and so on but personally from the things she posts I got the impression that it was all to excuse/ cover up the shopping.
View attachment 3344727
Because almost everyone has sympathy for a single mum and a lot of people have sympathy for substance addiction and see it, rightly or wrongly, as more of a physical illness than something like gambling or shopping.They don't take into account the dopamine etc that goes with those things . And I imagine our Young Tory guest has similar prejudices. I think the word ashamed here is as much about that as it is about anything else. She's ashamed of spending too much/ failing to save money. That's something her parents would really disapprove of.
Plus of course no one's gonna donate to pay the rent of someone who shops excessively. Let alone take them seriously as a poverty campaigner. It's vital for her image and career that she not be seen like that.
View attachment 3344733
yeah, that's her realest fear right there. See also Sue Lee. The tantrum she throws when people suggest she has money is of a different intensity I think.
View attachment 3344744View attachment 3344745
The relief of being able to blame it on booze, yeah. That's how this reads to me. He let her put it that way and she was so happy about that.
View attachment 3344746
And it's harsh to say this is just an excuse, but over two years after
View attachment 3344749
it sure sounds like one.
so yeah. All the hoarding and decluttering cycles and the constant reshuffling and rearranging of her stuff - including the ludicrous quarter hack - it's all about her relationship with her stuff. And I know she says it's about having nice things when she can after having "nothing" but I don't buy that.
View attachment 3344752
It’s one of the reasons support for gambling addicts is often deprioritised compared to booze/drugs - less relatable because the “substance” itself isn’t inherently addictive (the other being the lower impact it has on our health service).
Then there’s the complex relationship people have with excessive consumption of material goods to add to that equation and she would be pretty hard pressed to see a situation where she could come clean with family, friends or the public (particularly when denying the root - self-inflicted - cause of her “poverty” so vehemently).
And now she’s doubled down so many times, she can’t imagine she could walk it back.
Last edited: