She’s had messages from people saying she’s saved them £100 a week off their food bill?
bollocks has she
She’s had messages from people saying she’s saved them £100 a week off their food bill?if you search "thrifty kitchen" on twitter and keep the search to "top" (dependent on your algorithm, of course, but it's a bbc food tweet from 18th january 2021), it is just a short scroll to find that episode of dr rupy's iplayer show where jack sits there dressed as dennis nilsen, honking away about the poverty and tinned tomatoes while rupy patiently makes quite a nice looking jambalaya
It’s plausible if you consider that they’ve seen one of her ‘recipes’ and she’s put them off food so much that they just have cereal?She’s had messages from people saying she’s saved them £100 a week off their food bill?
bollocks has she
What a you know what
Unfortunately, "THE BEST IS YET TO COME"Why is she tweeting like Trump? It sounds deranged + hilarious.
Honestly at this point we could be playing ‘Jack or Don’, putting their tweets on without the names and trying to guess who said it.
The only way that could happen was if one of her recipes gave them food poisoning so all they ate for a week was dry toast and bananas.She’s had messages from people saying she’s saved them £100 a week off their food bill?
bollocks has she
100%. And to add to that- if people come here and JUST see Fraus (apparently) laying into Jack- even if it DOES get her grift seen through quicker- then it does indeed look like either a 'hate' forum (to Jack and her ilk & as described by the muchly paranoid), or something based wholly around investigative journalism (like Molly's blog or the other recent analysis) which is great- but not what I thought this forum was about.May I respectfully slightly disagree with this?I personally enjoy the little meanders off topic.
Im suspect we all have our reasons for being here beyond disliking grifters and hating slop.
I personally have had a year of really dark times and this thread has helped me through that immensely by giving me a distraction, but also I laughed a lot and learnt so much.
I have learnt a lot from you about addiction and AA and also just general how to navigate life with trauma.
Ive also learnt new recipes, got great book recommendations, I’ve actually bought a bag based on a canal recommendation and enjoyed the nonsense, walri And even the Motley Crew Schlong.
I do think the Jack stuff is super important and obviously purpose of thread and there are many in the canal contributing amazing and eye opening content.
However I would be a tad sad if all the side pumbles disappeared.
Hope I haven’t offended you, I am a massive people pleaser so am already anxiously overanalysing pressing post!
If that is true then they'd have to have been uncommonly stupid (respectfully) to start with.The only way that could happen was if one of her recipes gave them food poisoning so all they ate for a week was dry toast and bananas.
I don’t get how she even qualifies though. What exactly has she done for LGBTQ+ equality in the last year? Or ever, for that matter???Thread title nomination
ETA I'm sure she just deleted the "I don't owe you shit, pal" tweet
It also doesn't sit right she spun it as simply "campaigner of the year" but didn't explain the nomination category or signpost the awards website, just the link to vote, very sharp practice
"The annual PinkNews Awards aims to recognise the incredible contributions of those who campaign for LGBTQ+ equality worldwide, whilst celebrating moments of unprecedented LGBTQ+ achievement"
PMSLWhat the fuck is this? A haunted loaf?
she’s very online, and that’s enough for Pink News.I don’t get how she even qualifies though. What exactly has she done for LGBTQ+ equality in the last year? Or ever, for that matter???
Ever = Slept with some rich Lesbians. Came out as non-binary. Reaffirmed her Lesbian Status while publicly drooling over (and allegedly shagging) multiple men. Um... that's it, isn't it? Oh yeah- did a highly photoshopped DIVA shoot, pretending to be Ruby Rose/ Orange is the New Black, simped at wassisface, blocked people.I don’t get how she even qualifies though. What exactly has she done for LGBTQ+ equality in the last year? Or ever, for that matter???
Neither are most of the people voting for JackI note she's left the comments open on that Pink News tweet, rather than restricting them to thecomments club
Trying to drown out criticism with a flood of positive replies? I also note she didn't tag in Pink News, which seems a bit rude, since it's their awards.
Everyone voting for her instead of the actual campaigners in that link need to give their heads a wobble.
I'm not Pink News' target audience so I don't feel comfortable voting.
PMSL again at " a small jar of brown sadness "Excellent, more proof for my theory that slow cookers are a con because everything comes out brown and tasting the same. I am a reasonable cook but slow cookers defeat me. Much prefer my electric pressure cooker.
I'm happy to post a giant box of Australian avocados to Tattle HQ for distribution or collection. Avocados for everyone: no cartels involved in their production. I may even leave some at Jack's door, next to the soap and soupThere is nothing wrong with eating avocado if you are type 2. It's low carb and has fibre. There's a moral issue with regards to its production in Mexico and association with cartel violence though.
Pink News blocked me for being LGB.Neither are most of the people voting for JackGo for it.
it’s not worth voting at all. It’s all bullshit. The goal is engagement, not actually gauging popularity. The whole reason places like pinknews will put divisive people in their categories is because they win when their fans are mobilised to vote for them, AND when their detractors are mobilised to vote against them. It’s all total bullshit, and it doesn’t matter one jot whether Jack comes first or last. In fact, any evidence of people voting against her from here will just support her claims to victimhoodNeither are most of the people voting for JackGo for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?