Jack Monroe #376 Schrödinger's Poor Person

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Midriff crisis.
I think its a bit of both. She bleeping tragic. Pet youre getting old, no amount of botox, teenage clothing, hair dye is going to change that, just own it.

I am the same age as her, luckily i have no greys yet and the only wau i keep wrinkles away is my moisturizing twice a day all over. Takes 5 mins pet. I dont care that much about getting old, but i still take pride in myself.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 40
No, it's always just practical, no drama referrals and discussing actual solutions no emoting about starving poors and hungry people. Jack would find it all very dull.
I’ve worked in a welfare-adjacent role for a few years now. My first meeting, after I left I couldn’t stop ranting about how tit and unfair things were but had the self awareness not to be like Jack about it all and realised my colleagues had already been there, done that and were at the pragmatic, solution focus stage.
The last couple of months it has been hard as the pragmatism now has a real fear attached, we can’t really say “we’re ducked” when being professional but I’m bloody worried for everyone in this field and how we’ll keep it together for people. Again, none of us pontificate on Twitter about it (while rattling a tip jar) because we’re not bleeping ghouls.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 57
You did the right thing. I’m so angry too.
It wasn't enough. It’ll help for a few days but it isn’t a solution. Things are just going to get worse.
Im really angry that a decent woman wept in front me today because she couldn’t make me a coffee
 
  • Sad
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: 57
She's pretty much bought one of everything from the yellow range before getting bored and taking photos.

Have we seen a receipt? Have we seen the shopping in the crappy bungalow? Did she just dump the baskets in the aisle and LEFT to get a Maccie-D's on way home? Who. bleeping. Knows.
It's already been done in the Mirror anyway. The reporter also did a meal plan with the shopping , which is way more useful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31
She's reacting to a post which contained this picture as well as the 'friendly oncologist' tweet -

View attachment 1532666

Because apparently it's OK to cosplay someone having chemo if you are waiting for test results. And it's none of anyone's business that she shared this photo with all of twitter.
For me the worst bit about the 'friendly oncologist' tweet is that most people don't have half a million followers to just be able to put out "surely there's a 'friendly' oncologist (I'm a celeb don't you know) within my multi-Glasto crowd size following, where are you so I can avoid going to the GP and queuing like a poor". Seems unhinged and she really doesn't understand how the majority of these tweets can be taken outside of her echo chamber, it really microwaves my pears.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 69
Is there an illness /ailment /protected characteristic/mental health condition she hasn't appropriated?

The only one I can think of is old age, and even for jack's creative imagination I reckon that's a bit of a stretch for a few more years
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 38
Popping back for one minute to leave a message for Jack as I'm furious and not getting banned from twitter.

You're a total disgrace. You don't deserve to be around that child. Do you have any idea how traumatic it is to lose a parent? No, you don't, because you're 34 and yours are still here. You said you didn't tell anyone but two friends, not even your son. You also say he reads your tweets. You wanted to pay him to run your account. To put that information out there for him to find like that is beyond disgusting. Delete those tweets. Delete your account. Wipe your entire online presence for the sake of that child or don't be surprised when you lose access to him. Give everyone their money back, go to therapy and get a bleeping job.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 121
Tweeting her shopping.

I'm sick of her tit so can't even be bothered to screenshot more of her performative, dangerous balls.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Heart
Reactions: 66
For me the worst bit about the 'friendly oncologist' tweet is that most people don't have half a million followers to just be able to put out "surely there's a 'friendly' oncologist (I'm a celeb don't you know) in my multi-Glasto crowd size so I can avoid going to the GP and queuing like a poor". Seems unhinged and she really doesn't understand how the majority of these tweets can be taken outside of her echo chamber, it really microwaves my pears.
She didn't actually want a 'friendly oncologist', she just wanted to breadcrumb the idea that she may have cancer to her adoring audience. She really is despicable.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sad
Reactions: 89
Hey, it's just Magic select on Paint 3D, nothing super fancy or gauche, pal. Lol.


Peach slices? Did the Man from Del Monte stop delivering, Jack?
Is Paint 3D on PC only? I use Cupace but on my phone. You do have to free hand anything that gets cut though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I’ve worked in a welfare-adjacent role for a few years now. My first meeting, after I left I couldn’t stop ranting about how tit and unfair things were but had the self awareness not to be like Jack about it all and realised my colleagues had already been there, done that and were at the pragmatic, solution focus stage.
The last couple of months it has been hard as the pragmatism now has a real fear attached, we can’t really say “we’re ducked” when being professional but I’m bloody worried for everyone in this field and how we’ll keep it together for people. Again, none of us pontificate on Twitter about it (while rattling a tip jar) because we’re not bleeping ghouls.
Similar experience to me, but also that the staff are desperately worried about their own situations as well.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Heart
Reactions: 37
I will forever hold dear the anonymous people who would push an envelope through my parent's door with a supermarket voucher in when my Dad was unemployed in the '90's. I guess I didn't realise/ appreciate it at the time but there were a lot of people looking out for us and me. (By anonymous I mean I don't know who they were, my Mum probably did)
There are really good people out there. It helps to remember that
 
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: 38
For me the worst bit about the 'friendly oncologist' tweet is that most people don't have half a million followers to just be able to put out "surely there's a 'friendly' oncologist (I'm a celeb don't you know) within my multi-Glasto crowd size following, where are you so I can avoid going to the GP and queuing like a poor". Seems unhinged and she really doesn't understand how the majority of these tweets can be taken outside of her echo chamber, it really microwaves my pears.
Agree. It was both narcissistic (look at me and all my followers) and manipulative ( pressurising any oncologist to step forward in their genuinely limited free time) . Plus there are loads of good charities that can provide support and helplines. It was completely performative and unnecessary.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 40
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.