Jack Monroe #351 Nobody should be donating to a character from a Pulp song

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
one of the ones she was saying she’d had was low alcohol not no alcohol though. The speckled hen one I think?
low alcohol beers are effectively no-alcohol beers. The speckled hen low alcohol beer specificies “no more than 0.5% alcohol”, which is a hint to the fact that its purpose is to be consumed by people who want to have as little alcohol as possible in their guilt-free beers. This is the wrong tree to bark up; people struggling with alcohol will drink alcohol free beers, and alcohol free beers generally have trace amounts of alcohol in them. Drinking them isn’t incompatible with being dry/sober, because A: there isn’t enough alcohol in them for them to have any meaningful impact on someone whose body is used to drinking moderately to heavily, and B: the aim in stopping drinking is to organise your life around a recalibrated relationship to alcohol dependency - alcohol free beers don’t actually provide a “hit” for the dependence.

tl;dr - this really isn’t an avenue worth pursuing, and in doing so, it’s not the alcoholic drinking 0.5 beers that looks bad in this instance. It’s all the other stuff that’s the issue
 
Reactions: 28
I don't want you dead you silly twat, I'm locked into a rolling contract on slopbot.com. What do you expect me to do, get a real job instead of lampooning you? Don't think so pal.
 
Reactions: 120
Dubious Carol was all over her cooing at the SPITE dedication she wanted to put in the book to people who had wronged her. At this point I think they'd publish Jack's bathtime farts as an audiobook just to have something to put out.
 
Reactions: 44
She’s liked Jack’s pyramid stage tweet. But omg that’s an interesting point about the book possibly being cancelled, it would explain a LOT.
 
Reactions: 35
I don’t think that Jack has ADHD or autism. She has picked numerous diagnoses because she thinks it covers and excuses all aspects of her shitty, fraudulent behaviour.
 
Reactions: 50
Can't screenshot, but bless his heart...

"my respect and liking for you grows day by day. Also I opened fruit cocktail instead of peaches to go with the chickpea curry. Threw a few broken brazil in. Amazing. You the best."
 
Reactions: 49
Catching up... but just wanted to say one word:

Lovely.
 
Reactions: 22
Can't screenshot, but bless his heart...

"my respect and liking for you grows day by day. Also I opened fruit cocktail instead of peaches to go with the chickpea curry. Threw a few broken brazil in. Amazing. You the best."
Taking a Jack recipe and somehow managing to make it worse is pretty impressive.
 
Reactions: 39
HMRC consider Patreon to be taxable as payment for services. The fact the services don’t arrive is not the point. Also tips of any kind. These kofi and PayPal things are going to be looked at.

You can’t claim gifts from all and sundry - if you want to claim something is a non taxable gift it ideally should be recorded as such, with a reasonable relationship behind it that would lead to such a gift. If it’s above certain levels the gift giver needs to prove it is out of surplus income. Saying everything is a gift is not a get out of tax jail free card - they are onto it.
 
Reactions: 45
Gender identity, autism and alcoholism, oh my!!

jacks really chucking everything at this isn’t she. The grifter is on the ropes and she knows it
 
Reactions: 41
Also I'm sure since Jack's website has been 'down', she's also managed to somehow update the most important part of it - the #awkward tip jar paragraph. Strange she can do this whilst not being able to upload recipes
Really strange, isn't it?* As someone pointed out on here the other day (sorry I'm unable to credit, can't remember who it was), many people may think oh, she's not earning anything from Ads so I'll pop a small tip in her jar instead - hence making it more profitable for her to let the site remain "broken".

Going back to Patreon 'cause it's been bugging me. She's got around 60 new patrons so far. I would hazard a guess that the majority didn't sign up at £1, not when they were doing it to either defend her or shore her up, given her pitiful situation and blog post.
Just supposing she is being truthful ~she can't lie~ and that most many of her patrons pay £1/month. Someone like Mummy Nigella-from-the-bin would most likely be donating the highest tier, £44. If there is just ONE top payer for every 49 lowest ones, that's £49 + £44 per 50 donors. That's an average of just under £2 per person (£1.86 to be precise).
Even with 350 donors, with 7 of them paying £44 and the rest paying £1, it would bring her £651/month. For doing nothing except existing (and grifting). But let's be real - no way are 343 of her 350 patrons paying £1, I'd bet all my socks on it!

Didn't she say the other day "half of them don't pay the minimum, they pay less" or something like that? (Not quoting, just trying to recall what I read.) So let's play with some numbers (I like playing with numbers). I know there's already a spreadsheet - not trying to step on anyone's toes - just curious so I thought I'd play with some very low donor numbers while I had Excel open.

150 @ £1 £150
130 @ £3.50 £455
30 @ £7 £210
25 @ £10 £250
20 @ £12 £240
10 @ £24 £240
5 (!) @ £44 £220 - the handful of top tier donors drags the monthly average up dramatically!

370 donors, £1,765m / £21,180pa, less fees, taxable at current rates
FOR DOING NOTHING!

That's a VERY conservative estimate.

PS Please let me know if my numbers are incorrect, my mind is currently blown pumbled!

*Does anyone know of a second site where she posts recipes? The other day I saw some she'd uploaded in April either 21 or 22 but I don't know which site it was on. I was cleaning my old bookmarks folder out as I knew I had some of her stuff saved from years ago - I know it's childish but I did enjoy deleting them.
 
Reactions: 37
She just knows she can’t address the points raised by Molly directly. How is she supposed to explain that whilst she was sleeping rough she was hosting coffee mornings ? The only way to explain that would be to admit that she lied. But that would be the crack that brings the whole pov story crashing down. And that’s what her entire career and income is built on.

The route she’s chosen, to deny but only partially, to rely on her FMs, and to plead disability, is really the classic liars route. It’s a really bad choice. She should either address everything or ignore it completely. Go all in or all out. The route she’s chosen is disastrous because detractors are just going to chip away at her bit by bit.
 
Reactions: 44
I don't want you dead you silly twat, I'm locked into a rolling contract on slopbot.com. What do you expect me to do, get a real job instead of lampooning you? Don't think so pal.
Same, I need this money. I'm a freelancer with huge expenses, £3.60 on the bus to the Polish shop, £69 to buy a new oven every month
 
Reactions: 42
She had the best appointed cardboard box in the whole of Southend.
 
Reactions: 30
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.