I wonder if she’ll respond, knowing that they’re right and she’s a know it all fraud who spouts utter shite to line her own pockets.Sorry was just looking through search, if I click the tweet and read replies there’s a lot more. It’s split pretty cleanly between those calling it out & those who are celebrating our top impoverished urchin getting more work...
View attachment 360941
View attachment 360942
View attachment 360943
View attachment 360944
Ha! Good, I'm glad they're roasting her, she's such a hypocrite. Long may it continue, is she firing back at them?Sorry was just looking through search, if I click the tweet and read replies there’s a lot more. It’s split pretty cleanly between those calling it out & those who are celebrating our top impoverished urchin getting more work...
View attachment 360941
View attachment 360942
View attachment 360943
View attachment 360944
I read the Times article and was left with the impression that L was living by herself. It’s not stated but I felt that was the implication. Has anyone else read it?The Times and The Express. Wow, conversations around the table in the Bungalow must be really self-congratulatory at the moment.
Could she also be lying? Knowing that if she did say that she had been staying half the week in Southend that it wouldn't gain her any sympathy.I read the Times article and was left with the impression that L was living by herself. It’s not stated but I felt that was the implication. Has anyone else read it?
I read her account on Twitter and got the impression she was on her own , who knows. As said above , maybe she’s been keepingI read the Times article and was left with the impression that L was living by herself. It’s not stated but I felt that was the implication. Has anyone else read it?
The "article" is just her quotes with the "writer" adding in the completely unfounded speculation that she had the new variant and implying that this is why it was so bad. Dangerous and irresponsible, but nothing to do with what Louisa actually tweeted.I read her account on Twitter and got the impression she was on her own , who knows. As said above , maybe she’s been keepingher living arrangements private.
But if L was living alone who was she calling to from the bath? Who was she protesting to about calling an ambulance?I read the Times article and was left with the impression that L was living by herself. It’s not stated but I felt that was the implication. Has anyone else read it?
Because they are embarassingI read her account on Twitter and got the impression she was on her own , who knows. As said above , maybe she’s been keepingher living arrangements private.
- We're all so, so special in ways that you wouldn't understand and today we're focusing on what we imagine autism to be like as a means to distinguish ourselves and satisfy our massive, out of control egos. (paraphrasing)I don't even understand what they're talking about.
Man, this is bang on the money and it's infuriating that they do it and get away with it. What the fuck happened to integrity in journalism?This is somewhat off-topic, I know, but I can't get over just how many people who work in the actual news just carelessly spread lies and rumours. This tweet, by the communications person at Channel 4, is just spreading fake news about the new strain. Don't they have any basic fact checking sense or training? It's bizarre to me.
View attachment 360968
View attachment 360967
Anyway, Louisa's going to get a lot of attention from this (which she definitely shouldn't welcome - news people should never *become* the news, it's always bad).
It's genuinely so worrying. People who should be trained in critical thinking doing the exact opposite.This is somewhat off-topic, I know, but I can't get over just how many people who work in the actual news just carelessly spread lies and rumours. This tweet, by the communications person at Channel 4, is spreading fake news about the new strain. Don't they have any basic fact checking sense or training? It's bizarre to me.
View attachment 360968
View attachment 360967
Anyway, Louisa's going to get a lot of attention from this (which she definitely shouldn't welcome - news people should never *become* the news, it's always bad).
Louisa's approval would not have been required. anything on social media is in the public domain and can be 'reported on' freely.Wild that Jack can tell on herself all day long and the squiggles still only have the mildest glimmer of suspicion. The entire basis of her libel case against Hopkins was that she was sO mOrTiFiEd at the implication that she might not be willing to kill foreign civilians for Queen and Country because there is a grand tradition of her family doing the very same. Why the fuck wouldn’t she be a monarchist? They’re just so stupid: I don’t know how these people dress themselves or function in everyday society tbh.
Surprised that Louisa has given that article the go-ahead, or is she fair game in her position? It’s been blindingly obvious to all that she’s living with Jack and her Dazzling Bubbles of Many Overlaps. It looks pretty irresponsible to me, although I guess they’re both grown adults who’ve made a decision. Not a strictly legal one but whatevs.
We all know if she was offered a spot on the Masked Singer, she'd be in there faster than it took for her Covid to disappear
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?