Jack Edwards #2

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I can believe it- they're comics. Took me only a few hours to get through the whole series on Webtoon.
I know, I'm not saying I don't believe he read them in a day. I've read them and it also only took me a couple hours. I'm saying it's a weird coincidence that the exact one day that he's reading it, he gets the call to be invited. Especially on Easter Sunday and on such short-notice.
I'm more angry that it was billed as a LGBT event for an LGBT show and tons of influencers were invited (like Ruby, Jack and Jade) who have never indicated that they're LGBT in any way.
agreed, although i have to admit it fits with jack's content (moreso than ruby's and jade's at least). he's made an effort to read and promote lgbt books in his videos, so i can see why he'd be invitited to a premiere that celebrates an lgbt book adaptation. ruby and jade not so much (although i don't watch them much, esp. ruby so idk).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
View attachment 1166041

16/17 of his latest videos have been ADs... Also, it should be illegal to make the text the same colour as the background, and in a stupidly small size.
Trying to hide that a video is an ad annoys the tit out of me, I feel like it's illegal. Also I literally just got recommended one of his videos and came to see if he had a thread here to vent about his ads and this is one of the first posts I see haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
those best/worst books I've read are such lazy content. and we all know the reason that he spilt it into two videos was to make more money from the views, he's such a lying bellend
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Reaction videos are strangely popular on YouTube. I don't understand it really...it's clickbait-y sort of content imo. I think Jack's trying to boost views and get a wider audience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Reaction videos always struck me as the type of thing that appeals to people with no sense of self, happy to hop on the opinions of whichever influencer they stan and use those as substitute for their own, which they never bothered to develop to begin with. perfect for jack's audience then
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I think he's getting burnt out
He'd have to put in work and some amount of effort to get burnt out. Him jumping on tired viral trends is nothing new really, he's been doing it forever. All he's been doing for the past couple of years is stealing other booktubers' content ideas and running them into the ground, running nothing but cheap ads and pretending to read a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
What ever happened to that book-writing monthly newsletter that was supposed to start coming out in February? Some of us have good memories!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Jack, Ali Abdaal and Eve Cornwell are the only somewhat normal studytubers on here!
Ruby Granger is an eating-disorderd little girl, Unjaded Jade is a MLM hippie and Grace beverly is a woke eating-disordered fraud!
At the every least, Jack, Ali and Eve don't have eating disorders, greenwash their products, profit from fake wokery or steal from charities!

What are your legitimate complaints about Jack?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Jack, Ali Abdaal and Eve Cornwell are the only somewhat normal studytubers on here!
Ruby Granger is an eating-disorderd little girl, Unjaded Jade is a MLM hippie and Grace beverly is a woke eating-disordered fraud!
At the every least, Jack, Ali and Eve don't have eating disorders, greenwash their products, profit from fake wokery or steal from charities!

What are your legitimate complaints about Jack?
Is having an eating disorder something to criticise someone for?

In answer to your question, reading is a wonderful thing and there are plenty of posts for you to enjoy on why people have complaints about him. Have fun catching up :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Jack, Ali Abdaal and Eve Cornwell are the only somewhat normal studytubers on here!
Ruby Granger is an eating-disorderd little girl, Unjaded Jade is a MLM hippie and Grace beverly is a woke eating-disordered fraud!
At the every least, Jack, Ali and Eve don't have eating disorders, greenwash their products, profit from fake wokery or steal from charities!

What are your legitimate complaints about Jack?
I would choose to explain my reasons but I don't want to enter intro a conversation with someone who criticises and shames people who have eating disorders. Read the thread and go back to fangirling over Jack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Is having an eating disorder something to criticise someone for?

In answer to your question, reading is a wonderful thing and there are plenty of posts for you to enjoy on why people have complaints about him. Have fun catching up :)
having an ed and then glorifying it to your young and stupid followers is
but if you have an ed and then try to get better, no

I would choose to explain my reasons but I don't want to enter intro a conversation with someone who criticises and shames people who have eating disorders. Read the thread and go back to fangirling over Jack.
no fangirling, jack is just not that bad
 
Last edited:
Jack, Ali Abdaal and Eve Cornwell are the only somewhat normal studytubers on here!
Ruby Granger is an eating-disorderd little girl, Unjaded Jade is a MLM hippie and Grace beverly is a woke eating-disordered fraud!
At the every least, Jack, Ali and Eve don't have eating disorders, greenwash their products, profit from fake wokery or steal from charities!

What are your legitimate complaints about Jack?
Where to start…l oh yeah the first thread on page one


but his new persona is a joke, asking for language recommendations, it”s called the internet jack. like If you want to live in France great, but don’t make that your every personality
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
having an ed and then glorifying it to your young and stupid followers is
but if you have an ed and then try to get better, no


no fangirling, jack is just not that bad
Obviously people are not concerned for Jack as much as they are for others hence this is thread #2, while they're on threads 25+ or something.

He says stupid things so we come here to laugh at him. Does a Tattle thread only exist if someone does something really shocking or repulsive? Not really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
What are your legitimate complaints about Jack?
Jack accepted money from the NHS for an ad campaign during a pandemic, at a time when the underfunding of the NHS and lack of pay for nurses and frontline healthcare workers was at the forefront of the news. Jack never thought to refuse the money and do work for a good cause for free, and never donated this money to a relevant charity.

Jack took money from a Holocaust charity, too. He never returned it, and it only went unchecked because so much focus was on Ruby at the time with her endless lies and repeat offenses. Jack kept his head down, let Ruby take all the flack and people largely forgot about it. It still happened, much as Jack would like to conveniently forget about it.

Jack lies about the extent to which he reads almost as much as Ruby does. He often struggles to review a book beyond the most vague back cover blurb and buzzword pull quotes. All the while, he proclaims himself "YouTube's Resident Librarian", because that's not egotistical or anything.

He engaged in, endorsed and encouraged all the same toxic productivity habits as Ruby, Jade, Eve and Ali did/do. He quietly distanced himself from it later to pivot to different content without ever addressing his culpability in that. It still happened, and still undoubtedly had a damaging impact on countless impressionable viewers, much as Jack would like to conveniently forget about it.

Like Ruby, and others repped by Sixteenth, he's run blatantly dishonest undeclared ads and plant reviews. He makes sure that every video is an ad and that practically none of them are clearly labelled as such prior to clicking, in breach of ASA rules. He frequently runs ads glowingly endorsing products and services he never uses.

Not to mention the time he reviewed Vee's book, coincidentally on the exact same day as Ruby, at the exact same time as Holly Gabrielle and others were shoehorning the book into their content without mention of their ties to Vee and the big conflict of interest inherent in them being friends with her, being gifted the book, invited to a big launch party (at the height of Covid, no masks present). Jack made zero mention of his ties to Vee in his review, gave it a suspicious 5 stars and could only provide the vaguest overview of the book - clearly he never read it, and Sixteenth, who manage them all, told everyone to run plant ads and reviews to drive up publicity for the book in a dishonest fashion. Jack happily agreed rather than show any scruples.

Like Ruby, he is the face of a crappy stationery company known for lazily-designed, high price, low quality, narrow selection products made by a company that is so poorly run that they frequently have massive delays, regular mass printing errors and major defects. He markets these to everyday students and encourages them to pay these higher prices for crappy tat, rather than tell them to pay less for better elsewhere. Again, his management team do the legwork for this and Jack happily agrees in exchange for money rather than show any backbone, integrity or work ethic to built a brand offering quality, affordable products.

His content for the past few years has been woefully repetitive, insanely lazy, and built on ideas almost entirely borrowed or outright stolen from other YouTubers. His whole "i review every book recommended by [insert celebrity here]"/"i read every book seen in [insert tv show here]" schtick was stolen from John Fish. John ran a video 2 years ago in which he read every book mentioned by the main character in the TV show 'You'. It got 3 million+ views. Even so, John didn't just remake this video 4,000 times and instead kept making relatively diverse and original videos afterwards. Jack, meanwhile, nabbed this idea a few months later and has spent the past year and a half running it into the ground. John also went to Harvard while Jack was rejected from Oxford multiple times. Unlucky.

Content creation is his full-time, lucratively-paid job and he has no original ideas or personality of his own, recycling other creators' ideas, rehashing outdated viral booktube trends, speaking entirely in influencer catchphrases an bad puns and getting paid off the backs of other people. Meanwhile, he created a separate channel for identical content for no other reason than he wanted additional YouTube Play Button trophies to feed his ego.

He's every bit as bad as his peers in most of the same ways.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 23
Jack accepted money from the NHS during a pandemic at a time when the underfunding of the NHS and lack of pay for nurses and frontline healthcare workers was at the forefront of the news. Jack never donated this money to a relevant charity.

Jack took money from a Holocaust charity, too. He never returned it, and it only went unchecked because so much focus was on Ruby at the time with her endless lies and repeat offenses. Jack kept his head down, let Ruby take all the flack and people largely forgot about it. It still happened, much as Jack would like to conveniently forget about it.

Jack lies about the extent to which he reads almost as much as Ruby does. He often struggles to review a book beyond the most vague back cover blurb and buzzword pull quotes. All the while, he proclaims himself "YouTube's Resident Librarian", because that's not egotistical or anything.

He engaged in, endorsed and encouraged all the same toxic productivity habits as Ruby, Jade, Eve and Ali did/do. He quietly distanced himself from it later to pivot to different content without ever addressing his culpability in that. It still happened, and still undoubtedly had a damaging impact on countless impressionable viewers, much as Jack would like to conveniently forget about it.

Like Ruby, and others repped by Sixteenth, he's run blatantly dishonest undeclared ads and plant reviews. He makes sure that every video is an ad and that practically none of them are clearly labelled as such prior to clicking, in breach of ASA rules. He frequently runs ads glowingly endorsing products and services he never uses.

Not to mention the time he reviewed Vee's book, coincidentally on the exact same day as Ruby, at the exact same time as Holly Gabrielle and others were shoehorning the book into their content without mention of their ties to Vee and the big conflict of interest inherent in them being friends with her, being gifted the book, invited to a big launch party (at the height of Covid, no masks present). Jack made zero mention of his ties to Vee in his review, gave it a suspicious 5 stars and could only provide the vaguest overview of the book - clearly he never read it, and Sixteenth, who manage them all, told everyone to run plant ads and reviews to drive up publicity for the book in a dishonest fashion. Jack happily agreed rather than show any scruples.

Like Ruby, he is the face of a crappy stationery company known for lazily-designed, high price, low quality, narrow selection products made by a company that is so poorly run that they frequently have massive delays, regular mass printing errors and major defects. He markets these to everyday students and encourages them to pay these higher prices for crappy tat, rather than tell them to pay less for better elsewhere. Again, his management team do the legwork for this and Jack happily agrees in exchange for money rather than show any backbone, integrity or work ethic to built a brand offering quality, affordable products.

His content for the past few years has been woefully repetitive, insanely lazy, and built on ideas almost entirely borrowed or outright stolen from other YouTubers. His whole "i review every book recommended by [insert celebrity here]"/"i read every book seen in [insert tv show here]" schtick was stolen from John Fish. John ran a video 2 years ago in which he read every book mentioned by the main character in the TV show 'You'. It got 3 million+ views. Even so, John didn't just remake this video 4,000 times and instead kept making relatively diverse and original videos afterwards. Jack, meanwhile, nabbed this idea a few months later and has spent the past year and a half running it into the ground. John also went to Harvard while Jack was rejected from Oxford multiple times. Unlucky.

Content creation is his full-time, lucratively-paid job and he has no original ideas or personality of his own, recycling other creators' ideas, rehashing outdated viral booktube trends, speaking entirely in influencer catchphrases an bad puns and getting paid off the backs of other people. Meanwhile, he created a separate channel for identical content for no other reason than he wanted additional YouTube Play Button trophies to feed his ego.

He's every bit as bad as his peers in most of the same ways.
wow ty
I did now know that
so would u say ALL the studytubers above are toxic/dishonest?
isn't ali abdaal at least not repped by 16th?
 
Reaction videos always struck me as the type of thing that appeals to people with no sense of self, happy to hop on the opinions of whichever influencer they stan and use those as substitute for their own, which they never bothered to develop to begin with. perfect for jack's audience then
Reaction videos are so annoying. They've taken over music YouTube also. I want to listen to the song not see some nobody listening to the song.



This might be interesting for some people. Jack from Ali's perspective I guess.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.