Oh God, so now Tone's as addicted to Tattle as Alice is?
Oh God, so now Tone's as addicted to Tattle as Alice is?okay, they definitely love me, I didnt even post the message in question xD
he tweeted "libel" btw, for what lol
View attachment 2024514
View attachment 2024512View attachment 2024513View attachment 2024515
Loopy cannot handle a real man? No surprises here
View attachment 2024516
there is exactly a 0 % chance that Ioan will ever regret leaving his abuser
he did not cheat on his kids (lol), and his wife was going nutty before he showed his girlfriend (as if that is a valid excuse). the cheating is still completely unproven
If Alice's reaction, that triggered a permanent Restraining Order, is mildly compared to other women our society has serious issues. Not to mention that Alice's toxic pattern was not triggered by the divorce, she has always been rotten.
View attachment 2024517
Halle Berry...56Let's. I'll start. With Helen Mirren, 23 years Malice's senior. No further comment your honour.
I bought a wonder bra once and I swear I ended up with a extra chinAnyone else think she might have bought it to go round her chins?…
"Tone" has mixed feelings. He hates the loved up pics but is desperate to get info on them all the same.I don’t think Tone likes that Welp digs up cute pics of the “Fantastic 2” and also comments they are cute. I feel some jealousy rising.
There might be a sick child involved lol. I think she will go though.Alice will cancel out on the con the day before. Bet on it.
Woah!This is quite the rant
Are they suggesting that the paps photoshop her features? XD
View attachment 2024920
Over-invested abuse apologists complaining about people being invested to call out a abusers crimes and lies, you couldnt make this up
PS: the way they think googling opening hours of a well known outlet is some big task LOL
View attachment 2024944
Reading comprehension runs through family here: no one here said that but rightly pointed out that the fan he was responding to seems to think that Alice and the SIL are related since they point out Alice having her beauty from them lol
View attachment 2024923
it was obvious that this was filtered and it's especially sad since unlike their mother they look unfiltered better
funny enough the producers of Liar didnt approached him at first because they didnt know that a actor like him is available for this stuff. Moving to LA has done so much bad to his career in hindsight
I think so.The motion coming up 25th April, is that for the court to decide whether she is declared factually innocent?
Kids are also getting older now so courts tend to be lax on what is neglectful. Lying in bed all day with a toddler CPS would be straight round. Doing it with a tween and teen is definitely more of a grey area. I know Social services here are more lenient with neglect and older kids.The issue about this "primary caregiver" discussion is that it's very irrelevant. I dont know how it's in the UK since they tend to throw prenups out (and this thread tends to use too much the UK law on a case that is in California), but prenups are in California mostly only voided for procedural errors or if you can prove that you were coerced into signing it. They can consider voiding it if it's grossly unfair, but 30 % of the house sale and 10 % spousal support (the normal rate is 30-ish %), if that is even true, while all other assets are 50/50 doesnt sound to me like it's grossly unfair if you consider that Ioan entered this marriage as being much richer than her. Having kids has never been a reason since kids are excluded from prenups and covered over child support.
The "primary caregiver" discussion may become more relevant for custody, but even then it doesnt really. It's very true that California gives 50/50 custody even to addicts because of nannys being there to take care, so it doesnt - so to speak - work against Alice that she has a nanny. But it also doesnt work in her favour that she has one as Ioan can do the same thing. This is also why she needs to be very careful with her bedbound argument in light of them hardly being able to afford a nanny and all the evidence out there that she has (or had) a drinking problem, it could backfire.
YESSS! My first thought was it was for her necks.Anyone else think she might have bought it to go round her chins?…
She could, if found factually innocent, sue for malicious prosecution. So I think that's what the judge/commissioner was referring to. Not sure she would have much of a case, or the funds to pursue that kind of lawsuit, but it's a possibility.I think so.
Can anyone explain the part in the DM article that had a judge or someone say that it would open the LAPD (or the DA office?) open to civil litigation or liability?
ok, embarrassing is the wrong word, but I still think it's immoral tbh. A free game without ads having a seemingly large marketing budget implies that they either make a lot of money over using the users data or by a game that is contructed for dedicated (addicted) players to waste real money on it in order to progress. my Airline Manager Tycoon Game has that too, they give you the option to progress quicker by watching a couple of ads but only a couple of times per day, after a while you either have to wait several hours to make the next move or pay real money to get the items that can speed up the process. In my case this actually works fine as I dont waste much time on this game by being forced to wait for the next move, but somebody that is addicted will quickly waste a ton of money. And these games like the one Ioan promotes are mostly played by the most vulnerable, i.e. kids or elderly people.A lot of these online games are getting celebs to advertise for them lately. I can't remember the names of the games, but Kris Jenner was one of the first ones I noticed advertising them. Royal Match uses some celeb advertisers. It seems to be the trend now. So it's actually a good sign Ioan is doing this - he's getting work, getting paid, getting his name and face out there, and a lot of other celebs are doing it too, so nothing to be embarrassed about.
Alice could argue that the police had no right to arrest her etc. etc. It's obviously nonsense as they had clearly good reasons (I mean we all saw her tweets) to do it, but it's a possibility.I think so.
Can anyone explain the part in the DM article that had a judge or someone say that it would open the LAPD (or the DA office?) open to civil litigation or liability?
Thank you for breaking it down. I know there's no "typical" for abusers but do people arrested for DVRO or similar crimes usually request the factually innocent pathway?She could, if found factually innocent, sue for malicious prosecution. So I think that's what the judge/commissioner was referring to. Not sure she would have much of a case, or the funds to pursue that kind of lawsuit, but it's a possibility.
Otherwise, being declared factually innocent means her record would be expunged, basically, as it means that legally you have not committed a criminal act. In order to prove her factual innocence, Alice would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was no basis for her arrest. I don't think she can actually prove that, as there must have been probable cause (a basis for her arrest) for the charges to have been filed. The fact they were dismissed may not negate that.
Elon has nothing to do with Tattle but EVERYTHING to do with the site that Moany Tony and his sister spout their abuse on !Halle Berry...56
Angela Bassett...64 (surely not!!)
Sandra Oh...51.
All at the Oscars last night and all looking fabulous. Or what about Jamie Lee Curtis, who is now 64 and who has just won her first Oscar? There is life after 50, we don't all fall apart just because we're getting older!
Btw, what has Elon got to do with Tattle?
Btw 2: Should *anyone* need to contact a Brizzle MP, you can find their details here...
Could it be that IG's team have raised the issue of the video of IG and Ella? Which he probably wouldn't have known about if not for Tattle?It's telling, is it not, that while the heavily filtered side of the personality is claiming everything is going well, the other side is suddenly, inexplicably raging against Tattle. Why would they be bothered if everything is supposedly fine with charges dropped? (Rhetorical question)
I understand your feelings and share them to a large degree. I play 2 online games and when I first started it was very easy to spend money on them and forget about my budget. I've started watching a lot of Kdramas and it shocked me that Korea uses celebs to sell everything - even medications, which is illegal where I live, and personally I think is both immoral and dangerous. Obviously advertisements is a lucrative sideline for a lot of celebs, but it's something I personally have mixed feelings about.ok, embarrassing is the wrong word, but I still think it's immoral tbh. A free game without ads having a seemingly large marketing budget implies that they either make a lot of money over using the users data or by a game that is contructed for dedicated (addicted) players to waste real money on it in order to progress. my Airline Manager Tycoon Game has that too, they give you the option to progress quicker by watching a couple of ads but only a couple of times per day, after a while you either have to wait several hours to make the next move or pay real money to get the items that can speed up the process. In my case this actually works fine as I dont waste much time on this game by being forced to wait for the next move, but somebody that is addicted will quickly waste a ton of money. And these games like the one Ioan promotes are mostly played by the most vulnerable, i.e. kids or elderly people.
In no way I'm criticising Ioan for this. He is in a desperate situation (and this is why I find it ridiculous that Alice says she makes no ads for things she doesnt like herself, she is not in a situation to chose this). I'm more critical of the celebs that are already very rich and should rather spend their time promoting the fight against game addiction rather than to cash money from it. I'm sure Ioan wouldn't do this if he wouldnt be in desperate need of money in order to provide for the kids (he himself is somewhat safe given that his partner is actually financially supporting him)
Alice could argue that the police had no right to arrest her etc. etc. It's obviously nonsense as they had clearly good reasons (I mean we all saw her tweets) to do it, but it's a possibility.
It's very unlikely that she will get declared as "factually innocent" as clearly there was evidence.
He posted that pic of Rach and his MiL knowing Tattle would comment on it. Then 'he' goes off on one! Fuckwit.Poor Tony just can't function without his daily dose of tattle, his faux anger. He absolutely loves the attention really!
yes, it is common and recommended to try as it basically destroys all your arrest records (I believe they currently would show up on background checks).Thank you for breaking it down. I know there's no "typical" for abusers but do people arrested for DVRO or similar crimes usually request the factually innocent pathway?
I imagine she wants to because it would impact her record and custody, but is something like that just par for the course?
Bianca would have to get a visa to live in the UK too. Not impossible, but IG has to divorce and sell the house before any movement is possible.I do wonder if Ioan is held back by Bianca here as she seems to live the same Hollywood dream as they did 20 years ago and obviously no matter what Alice does it will be the opposite of Ioan just to screw him and cause no movements.
LMAOHe's having a huge tantie, isn't he? Luckily he's put himself down for a nap.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?