The fact is that nobody needs to not be able to see their children for 1 year because of an ex. IG could have put measures in place by now that would have gave him access. That is what I’ve said from the start and that is what is a fact.3) contd, All those discussions have ended with Not much he can do at the moment. ATM there is nothing legal in place. He is in limbo, there is no court-ordered anything yet, so technically I believe she is not in breach of anything. Hence as I understand it (I may be wrong) none of those remedies apply ATM. I think that is where we are at.
However - he may actually have things in place that we aren’t aware of. IG may have taken the decision to deal with child access and visitation with the finalisation of the divorce - I don’t know either way.
There are things he could put in place without waiting for the divorce to be finalised or for the upcoming pro.
The narrative that there’s nothing he could / can do is false. It’s simply not fact based.