Yet again India showing concern for babies.
unlike in her case, gone, because you chose to live with a convicted p.aedophile. She is bleeping disgusting.Yet again India showing concern for babies.
Eeuuw I hadn't actually read it - just the headline. I see she talks about the revolting Eric. Are we supposed to feel sorry for him?unlike in her case, gone, because you chose to live with a convicted p.aedophile. She is bleeping disgusting.
It is gaslighting on a massive scale.It really pisses me off that she thinks it’s fine to write on this subject, actually mention her convicted p.aedophile partner and The Times, it’s readership, her Twitter followers think it’s all fine. What have we become?
It’s so gobsmackingly unbelievable how IK has sheltered him.From Julie:
I would presume mostly nepotism. Is her stepdad ( from whom she takes her surname) still at the Times? Her ex husband, Jeremy Langmead, father of her sons, the one who is now out as a gay man, is also working for the Times. I think he’s recently been appointed as a Fashion Editor there. He appears to have three homes.Is it not just nepotism that keeps her at The Times? Not sure what the current status of that is.
He’s the Style Editor for the magazine. He can probably commissions IK.I would presume mostly nepotism. Is her stepdad ( from whom she takes her surname) still at the Times? Her ex husband, Jeremy Langmead, father of her sons, the one who is now out as a gay man, is also working for the Times. I think he’s recently been appointed as a Fashion Editor there. He appears to have three homes.
In an article he wrote last year for Mr Porter magazine, he mentioned that one of his sons lives in a flat share in East London.
I think this is at the root of India's need to tell single women she's superior to them simply by being married. Every man she had married has not been interested in India physically. Jeremy was interested in dick. Eric is interested in pre-pubescent girls. That has to burn, that no man you've been with ever really fancied you, but was using you as a human shield, a beard to hide his gayness, or mask his pedophilia.I would presume mostly nepotism. Is her stepdad ( from whom she takes her surname) still at the Times? Her ex husband, Jeremy Langmead, father of her sons, the one who is now out as a gay man, is also working for the Times.
good point. Why she chose EJ over her own daughter though is pretty low. Also I think on Eric’s rap sheet he was watching actual babies/toddlers being abused. But that’s ok with India.That has to burn, that no man you've been with ever really fancied you, but was using you as a human shield, a beard to hide his gayness, or mask his pedophilia.
All of this just points to ABSOLUTE desperation. Which would be tragic, were she not so bloody unlikeable.good point. Why she chose EJ over her own daughter though is pretty low. Also I think on Eric’s rap sheet he was watching actual babies/toddlers being abused. But that’s ok with India.
is Mr Langmead the father of the daughter as well?I think this is at the root of India's need to tell single women she's superior to them simply by being married. Every man she had married has not been interested in India physically. Jeremy was interested in dick. Eric is interested in pre-pubescent girls. That has to burn, that no man you've been with ever really fancied you, but was using you as a human shield, a beard to hide his gayness, or mask his pedophilia.
thanks. His new wife is beautifulAndrew O'Hagan is the father of her daughter.