We were in lockdown in November so she shouldn’t have been there. She’s a selfish, vapid little princess with a 5 year olds mentality stuck in a 26 (??) year olds body
I saw someone comment on her post about her being in tier 3, she wrote she was allowed to leave for work. Pretty sure it’s for ESSENTIAL work... not prancing around like a cheapskate in a free dress that looks like it would go up in flames near a naked flame
well, yes and no. You were allowed to be outside in a public place with no real travel restrictions when it came to outdoor recreation, so I think you could argue that that’s what she was doing, and to see Alex more than anything else.
I think it’s much more of a problem that she’s doing it now, when the rules specifically stop someone coming from a higher level to a lower one - which wasn’t the case when it was nationwide. While I agree with the other person who commented that she’s hardly a risk because it’s not like she really leaves her house apart from to see Alex, it’s not a great look when shedoesn’t hide the fact shes travelling over, and it’s also not her only job so it’s not like it’s really essential for her to be doing it.
Editing to say I’m annoyed to see her eating in a restaurant with someone else too

I know that sounds petty, but restaurants are closed in tier 3, and in tier 2 (which London is) you’re supposed to eat outside unless you’re with your bubble. I absolutely froze today keeping to the rules and sitting in a non heated pub garden
