Harry & Meghan #54 H&M to fall off their perch. More money needed, what won't they 'merch

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts

Wightgirl

Plus he had to pay some of the Mail’s costs. £35k vanity project yet the sugars seem to think it’s a major victory
 
Reactions: 24

Baguette

Today: The judge's order read: "[Prince Harry's] solicitors' costs for the application for the unilateral statement in open court—just short of £35,000—are manifestly disproportionate.

"No litigant of ordinary means would reasonably consider spending such a sum on this exercise.

"The agreement of a statement in open court in this case (that respected the proper purposes of a statement in open court) should have been a straightforward exercise and achieved at modest cost."

I remember, back in the autumn, that Warby mentioned that Megz' legal costs were 'disproportionate'..... Think we can guess where he's heading...
 
Reactions: 33

Scotch Mist

They appear to be imploding
The great philanthropists who spend more money on useless PR and lawsuits to try and control the narrative. They still haven't learned their lesson and Smeggy cack pants still hasn't realised that she's not 'insanely smart'
 
Reactions: 34

Milliemoo99

Wightgirl said:
The Telegraph are saying that Hazza had to pay the rest. Who spends £35k on a statement????

View attachment 413871
Click to expand...
That is hilarious....

Harry makes such a fuss about a Daily Mail clickbait article that he ends up paying out £32,500 of his own money

That a pretty expensive way to buy an apology!

Harry if you have so much money to just burn, and throw away, can you pay me/give me £32,500 for a bit of sensible advice?
follow the motto, actions speak louder than words (and meaningless photoshoots in a cemetary) Actually get out there and do something for the British military. Give the Daily Mail a different photoshoot or positive story to publish!
 
Reactions: 32

LadyMuck

Thanks Scotch. H needs to concern himself with Archie who maybe vulnerable without his wider family..well all his family.
 
Reactions: 21

catp

The biggest irony ? The Kween of fluff PR complaining about clickbait.

Ooh look at this headline.... "PH spotted at the Inauguration"....click....oh no, wait it was just a photograph of him (from YEARS ago, on the wall, seen for a split second behind Biden...)

Does this woman even realise just how ridiculous she sounds?!

I'm waiting to see JCMH's reaction to the massive trolling he is going to get from the sugarz. They are already calling him a traitor because he allowed poor Megz' name to be taken off the birth certificate.

Megz has used the word "offensive" to indicate her displeasure, and boy have the minionz taken that idea and run with it. Having read some of their awful comments online, I feel they are going to explode with hatred towards the RF ....and now also JCMH...

He thinks he's had a "mothership" of online nastiness...well he's about to get the motherf***ing lode !

It is rather odd that the statement about the birth certificate was only by her and not them, though isn't it? It's not a joint statement - whether by her inadvertent (or deliberate) exclusion, or his refusal... who knows?

Regardless, it seems she's thrown him to her wolves sugarz
 
Reactions: 25

Milliemoo99

The shade in the Daily Mail article!!!!

'''The Duke of Sussex has said vulnerable children 'should not be forgotten' amid the global Covid-19 crisis.

Prince Harry, 36, is currently living in his $14 million Santa Barbara mansion with Meghan Markle, 39, and their eighteen-month-old son Archie, having stepped back from royal duty last year.'''

If Harry thinks he has scored any kind of victory against the Daily Mail....he is going to be sorely mistaken!!!

That article is ............pretty biased...............on the surface, .it's meant to be a sensible fair article about the Wellchild charity, which is raising money for vulnerable children, ........but ....its about a Prince living in a million dollar mansion spouting ...platitudes......

Harry is probably furious at the Shade!!!!! poor diddums!!!!
 
Reactions: 32

Kotare

LadyMuck said:
Thanks Scotch. H needs to concern himself with Archie who maybe vulnerable without his wider family..well all his family.
Click to expand...
Good point

Care of his ghastly mother, poor wee Archie has no maternal family contact apart from ONE person, notably Doria

Now, it would seem the Duchess of Manipulation and Ghosting wants to deny him association with his paternal lineage. Her cruelty in denying the nonagerian sovereign and her 100 year old husband the pleasure of seeing their great grandchild is almost unbelievable.

She’ll not be happy until she’s sitting in the biggest and best house in California surrounded by her pilfered British Crown Jewels, all alone
 
Reactions: 20

LadyMuck

"Tourre Bakahai on Twitter: "1/ Why was it "dictated by The Palace"? 2/ What's the point of citing "documents" with no proof? 3/ So you do read the tabloids? 4/ Isn't your PR man Omid, 31, a "so called expert"? 5/ Who said "calculated family snub", apart from you? 6/ Why this "clickbait" tabloid rant? https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
 
Reactions: 27

Minky Billups

More like “here I am paying lip service to something. Don’t forget about meeeeeeeeeee!!” It’s all him at the moment. Where the hell has she skulked off to?! Where ever it is, can she take him with her!

Angela Levin said on Talk Radio she contacted Arsewell as directed to by the palace (as it didn’t concern them). She did and they got back to her within 10 minutes, but all she got was the statement released yesterday. She went back and asked for a copy of said documents (or ‘receipts‘ as the ssx squad would say!!) and got radio silence.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 18

JAR21

Why is Scobie referring to her as Duchess Meghan. That's not her correct title
 
Reactions: 22

Cinnamon.girl

That was a help.
Did anyone have a view as to whether the Dannatt letter was orchestrated by BP?
It was all over the tabloids. Odd.

cosmo girl said:
I think LSA is lipstick alley ?
Click to expand...
We need a Thank You response button. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 15

Scotch Mist

Does anyone else that the Harkles must have received bad news from the palace?
They must have been briefed by now about what they are losing when the review comes up.
This would explain Meghan's nasty biteback about the birth certificate (which is illegal anyway without Hazno managing to mark the spot with an X). And apparently only the parents are allowed to change a birth certificate so the palace didn't do it.

She knows its all over and so has nothing else to lose with her little outbursts. If she thought there was any chance of more funding she would think twice.

She is busy stirring up the vile squad as an act of retribution. I really wish someone would expose her involvement with them and that the whole lot of them have the police visiting them soon.

Yup I reckon Smeggy has been banned from ever coming back here
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 32
R

rainyfaces

JAR21 said:
Why is Scobie referring to her as Duchess Meghan. That's not her correct title
Click to expand...
Because he is a suck up weirdo with mummt issues. Really annoys me too. Harry isn't Duke Harry, it's not how English titles work, god it's so annoying, she was in the country less than two years and a duchess in the country for like six months, how she can claim to be the duchess of anything is a total joke!
 
Reactions: 27
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Menu
Log in
Register