- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Sorry, but they'll have to wait. There is a queue and I am first in line.
Isn't that Harvey's new gym?Saw this story in the Mail and all I could think was that looks better than Archiedoll’s shed.
Father creates incredible playhouse for his daughter for just £800
Rich Saunders, 40, from Dorset, constructed the incredible playhouse for his two-year-old daughter for just £800 after initially being quoted £3,800 by a tradesman for just the shell of a house.www.dailymail.co.uk
View attachment 362020
İ can see TQ stepping in as being why the Judge and MOS accepted the Trial postponement so easily. But very disappointing if true as everyone wants to see MM take accountability and be exposed. İ guess there are many aspects of this whole scenario which the RF are party to but which we don't see. While appearing to benefit MM, their actions will always be to protect the Firm. İ can also see an extension to the review being accepted (perhaps if a divorce is on the cards). My feeling is that they all want MM to be as self-sufficient as possible. With a divorce there could be some finality about the titles. Perhaps not being a British Citizen, and a desire to become more involved in politics could see the title relinquished / taken away while Harry gets to keep his. The whole Archie scenario is weird, especially if another baby is being concocted. Looks like we will be entertained for a bit longer yet.....
I would love nothing more than for this case to go to trial but carefully placed(?) comments online have me wondering if it ever will.
In my opinion, she does reflect badly on the RF. They both do.
The trial if it did go ahead would be the worst media circus since the Depp case and I think the RF would do all that they could to avoid that because it will reflect on them by virtue of Harry.
Your last but one paragraph may be the most likely outcome, we wait and see.
Nothing would surprise me with these two, her especially.
I agree. I've said before he looks like he possibly has some sort of syndrome. There's loads of different signs, some are apparent at birth and baby checks, some become more obvious as the child develops.
I don't think it's a surrogacy issue as they will likely have used some kind of elite agency that only the famous have access to. Any agreement would've been watertight and the surrogates carefully vetted.
She has no motherly instinct towards him. He's over 18 months old so she's had plenty of time for this to develop. The fact that it hasn't suggests that she isn't bothered about him for whatever reason, and hasn't bonded because a nanny does all the work/he doesn't live with them. Do we know anything about the nanny/nannies? I wonder if they are specialised in any kind of behavioural/medical issue, as that would be quite telling.
If the phone messages include, amongst other things, megzy whining to her friends about events/anecdotes behind palace walls, and since the palace policy is "never explain..." the messages sit on their own without any RF attempt at countering/disproving the claims in the messages, then the RF would have been against the court case from the outset AND would be doing what they can to avoid any of the messages coming to light.
Remember megsy is said to have been keepimg a diary from day one of scooping harry.
Next to the guest House .... where Dorito or the nanny live, with Farchie.
She was careful to weave the "I do everything for my son myself" tale into her Times article, too.
My guess is, they do it so no one wonders why they don't have a nanny for her non live-in doll.
No private contract trumps the law, so this would be irrelevant.
Does the guest house have bars? If not, wrong adress.
This. She wants out she can drop the case. The RF want her out she can drop the case. It would involve negotiation and money and agreements. More than she would probably go for. Not delays and summary judgements.
And the only person this case is hurting is herself.
If Doris is the nanny, that would make sense of Doris registering a Care business, and getting paid as a professional, and the photo of Doris with Farchie, and her sudden $9m net worth, despite not currently having a job
I was just wondering what happens if you break an NDA? Obviously there could be financial penalties but just say you didn't really have any wealth to speak of and didn't have anything to lose - can you be sued for any future earnings? I mean - would it have a long lasting impact on your life or do you just have to pay up at that point in time. Can you be sued for millions if you have nothing?
It just makes me wonder why more people don't speak out against certain clebs or even Megsy if they don't own any assets or are poorly paid anyway - eg, nannies?
It just makes me wonder why more people don't speak out against certain clebs or even Megsy if they don't own any assets or are poorly paid anyway - eg, nannies?
He did try, but Chelsy and Cressida and others all came to their senses eventually and said "feck that!"
Surely any message displaying information relevant to others would be screened out as if fairness is the rule if the others have no say in this court they cannot defend themselves so would immediately be at a loss. I don't think the judge would allow this.
Thanks I know very little about surrogacy or the laws surrounding it. I do know someone who used one though, due to her being born without a womb. She does have ovaries though, so provided the eggs and the surrogate was just the host.
Does a surrogate have more rights if they themselves donate the egg, or is it all the same either way?
I don't think and NDA will trump the law.of the country. E.g. if there were safeguarding concerns these would not be 'forbidden' . Or they may be but that element of an NDA wouldn't stand. It is a civil contract so any element of criminal responsibility would not be covered.
So whatever situation there may be no concerns for the child.
I don't know US law but would imagine that confidential referrals to social services/ child services are still easily made.
Why does the pool have eight umbrellas. We know the pair of them don't have that many friends. Even if Oprah, McPhee, MyLittlePony, Marcus, Noooonoooooooo and Plastic Scabies all come over at the same time, there's still going to be umbrellas going spare.
What Meghan wants, Meghan gets...
'The Queen stepped in' would be textbook Megz PR, wouldn't it?
Not 'I eventually had to concede my lawyers were right all along and this case is at Johnny Depp levels of toxic disaster'
If the RF were going to persuade Megz to shut it down, that would have been agreed in February as part of the Megxit negotiations. They didn't then, so why now?
I was thinking more along the lines of people that just wanted to spill the tea against a cleb or defend themselves when something is said against them by that person (eg, the nanny doing something to endanger archie's life?)
The millions D. is allegedly doing time for right now because she violated her alleged parole by not paying taxes on them, are said to be the MsMirrorMoney from the incessant Merchess.
Edited, spyed a typo. There might be more...
Last edited:
- Status