Thanks
@Chita and
@Thalia
Excellent post last thread
@giraffetower , and I agree that the integrity of the LoS is very important. There's also setting a precedent which could be used by others as a loophole later on.
If you want privacy, get out of the LoS. If you want to stay in the LoS with its kudos and status, allow yourselves to be validated. The first duty of the Monarch isn't to protect the Ho's raddled Minge, it's to follow the laws of the land and be seen to do so by the people. He can do this without invading anyone's pretend "privacy" - though let's be honest and admit it's secrecy and fraud.
Parliament is of course needed, but Parliament does
not go against the will of the Monarch.
The Sussexes took Splash! to court after the pap shots of the Ho in Vancouver in January 2020 with the doll on strings, and Splash! filed for bankruptcy and went into administration. They set it up and then sued, rumours being that they made quite a bit of money and shared it with the bent pap. This was after the drones.
Duper's delight. They set Splash! up then ruined them.
Thomas Markle didn't set himself up with the paps, the Ho did with her mate Jeff Rayner of Coleman-Rayner, who the Ho sent to Rosarito. Jeff told him him his public image would be improved before the wedding with a few photos. TM fell for it and daft pictures of him were splashed all over the world. Jeff grabbed a waiter from a nearby restaurant and got photos of him using a tape-measure round TM. The Ho then played the victim and said heartless daddy had sold her down the river for $150,000. I believe she gave this money to Rayner to take to Rosarito to tempt TM, as with financial gain for TM her victimhood would be more believable.
When the pictures were published TM had 2 heart-attacks and was admitted to hospital. The Sussexes doctored texts back and forth and the Stoat was unpleasant.
Iirc Thomas Markle sued Jeff Rayner later in Australia as TM had no say in the photos. It became very messy involving Australian Seven Network, and I think TM was too ill and stressed to see it through.
"Thomas Markle was suing paparazzi agency Coleman-Rayner's owner, Jeff Rayner to the tune of $1 million, over "hammy" staged photos because they were printed without his approval, right before Markle's wedding to Prince Harry,".
Seven has denied the imputations were conveyed but said that, if they were, claims Mr Blaylock-Rayner was a dishonest photographer who conned Mr Markle were true."
So for me Thomas Markle can complain all he likes. Why should he never complain never explain? He's been totally trashed by his malevolent daughter, and I hope he lives a long life and remains a thorn in her side - along with Junior and Samantha.
This must be a first
www.countryliving.com
closeronline.co.uk
www.telegraph.co.uk
