Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

ChaoticArtist

VIP Member
I just finished watching a web series 'Heeramandi', based on the courtesans in Lahore (now in Pakistan) in the pre-Independence era.

Such graceful actresses, Smegs couldn't have fit in at all, in spite of the content. And some of the values the characters exhibited (in spite of being courtesans), the dignity. Well, Smegs spells something else with 'D' 🙄

It's a good one, if anyone wants to watch, although it is a Netflix original (we get it for 'free' with our expensive phone plans, might as well use it).

In one of my favourite scenes, one of the courtesans absolutely destroys her former patron. Kind of lewd so I'm not typing it 😂 But I wish someone had put Sparry in his place the way the character puts her former patron in his.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 19

Churchill's Ghost

VIP Member
She hasn't bothered with any new products since the jam sticky runny goo, has she?

There has also been zero activity on their social media. They couldn’t even be bothered to share the 10 people who did post about the scam jam (although, to be fair* I think most of the, put them in their stories, not their feed. I am not sure that you can share a story)


*Those who watch Letterkenney can sing it with me “to be faiiiir”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19

Sami Lee

VIP Member
@TheMiceInTheShed
🐀 🐀 👇👇👇👇🐀🐀🐀🐀
Thanks @LadyMuck 🧜‍♀️
Video on the Flatpacks
BookWorm says the truth as she sees it, not 100% correct. Yesterday Paula M invited BookWorm to a live stream but she wasn't able to make it which she regrets. Each blogger seems to have a piece of the puzzle, and they should pool their information to get to the truth - Piers Morgan, Paula M, Lady C.

BookWorm believes Ffark was a surrogate with Stoat and Ho DNA, but that Lili was a designer baby and adopted.
She went through the moonbump details, but impossible to prove in a court of law without proof. The legal implications however are huge, and not only for the Line of Succession.

There were signs early on from TRF that something was wrong, though HM and PC refused to acknowledge the truth and it was left to the Cambridges to drop hints.

There was no clarity about Ffark's birth date, and Harald's description of the birth details was ludicrous. Nothing added up, the Portland, Ob-gyn, Midwife, doctors, no bodyguards or royals, no press, no action. Where was Snakebite? Supposedly there but nobody saw her.

Five years on, still no information. The question is, Why? What about the birth has to be kept secret?

BookWorm discussed subsequent Ffark photos. The one with the baby feet was generic, the Father's Day photo also generic according to KP - but likely Rex, Stacy Solomon's son born around the same time. Why copy and paste other people's babies?

On the BP photo of HM, PP, Snakebite and the Sussexes with Fffark,(shawl) the people in the photo had pixel density differences. The end result was copied, pasted or photoshopped, and was not in its original form.

A contact of Bookworm's said that she saw Ffark at 5 days old but that he looked very big for 5 days. The Ho said Ffark was a big baby (he wasn't ) . The contact said she also saw Ffark on zoom. The contact also confirmed that Ffark's Christening did not happen when or how we were told. The contact then deleted her profile.
I wonder if that contact was the specialist neonatal nanny?
I've heard and read some interviews with her and she's a full-on fan of the stoats....she's not British born and left their employ on very good terms after the SA tour I believe.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 19

Happy Lady

VIP Member
Many thanks to Who'sYerDaddy for the lovely thread title who I can never manage to tag correctly...

Recap:

View attachment 2954752

(There was also something about Harry not being allowed to add Murdoch to his lawsuit)

I am 100% sure that this picture is photoshopped. Here, William looks to be in his late teens/early twenties. And it's a face stuck on top of a collar - no neck. Totally unbelievable.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 19

wibble

VIP Member
Neil Sean... as ever we have to say allegedly...



It makes sense of granny Kardashian saying that she was going to be photographed with Prince George....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

wibble

VIP Member
Biden needs the Black vote. Biden needs the ‘woke white woman’ vote. He’s protecting Markle…not Harry. It’s not that she is that important or that popular …the problem is the race is too close.
He also has the Ukraine to consider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

Blockster

Well-known member
Was that Piers Morgan clip recent? Sounds like they were talking about the photoshopped mothers day photo. Which if it was then it backs up his claim he heard things weren't good, as Catherine's statement came out shortly after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

CELESTE CROCKETT

VIP Member
I would love for Catherine’s first appearance to be on the balcony at Trooping the Colours. Unlikely I know, but a balcony appearance would break the internet
I'm hoping maybe at the window
Of course it won't stop the vile sussexsquad they'll say it's a double
But it would be reassuring to see her
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 18

Carpediem69

VIP Member
What do you make of this? An interview with an ‘alleged’ ex-employee!!!!
Not sure I believe this - any thoughts ? 😬 (is it April 1st) 🤔🤔🤔🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18