You would think... But this is a super attention to detail megastar that can't even get regular undergarments correct without a moonbump. Don't even start on the outer layer!
You would think... But this is a super attention to detail megastar that can't even get regular undergarments correct without a moonbump. Don't even start on the outer layer!Those pictures are certainly insinuating all is not legit…. why the f didn’t she pull on a big pair of stretchy knickers to keep it in situ- if indeed she was wearing a prosthetic
https://giphy.com/myZFKPQhM9NSMzhYL5
Thing is, Cinny, Georgie has always been clear and ruthless about who's buttering her bread. It's not the stoats. No matter what Chuck does she will never traduce him and his wife - and certainly not his butter. One can admire (to a certain extent) her constancy to purpose (her own interests) but not the mental contortions involved in blame-shifting. She has her opinions though and I'm glad that she is free to express them.I don't know why Lady C says that press injunctions were done by the Sussexes. Imo this can't be true, they are under the protection of the Palace and it's the Palace who are suppressing the free expression of opinion here. I listened to TRG for the first time, a good video, and she says Harald's suppressing free speech in the US and the Palace are doing it this end.
Also if it's to be believed, the Stoat wanting to come clean about the children resulted in BP asking the press to hold off until an official statement was made - October, hence Lady C's postponements of the big reveal?
Just surmising here on the information available, but it's odd that Lady C is laying the blame for the press gagging on the Sussexes when she must know it's not. I wonder if her book has been run by the Palace and given the OK? I can't see them allowing her to say they've gagged the press for their own ends.
It's so easy to shift the blame sideways, like shift the royal racist blame onto Catherine, shift the gagging onto the Sussexes. It's in print, becomes the truth and this might now be the official line.
Or TRG has got the wrong end of the stick.I don't know why Lady C says that press injunctions were done by the Sussexes. Imo this can't be true, they are under the protection of the Palace and it's the Palace who are suppressing the free expression of opinion here. I listened to TRG for the first time, a good video, and she says Harald's suppressing free speech in the US and the Palace are doing it this end.
Also if it's to be believed, the Stoat wanting to come clean about the children resulted in BP asking the press to hold off until an official statement was made - October, hence Lady C's postponements of the big reveal?
Just surmising here on the information available, but it's odd that Lady C is laying the blame for the press gagging on the Sussexes when she must know it's not. I wonder if her book has been run by the Palace and given the OK? I can't see them allowing her to say they've gagged the press for their own ends.
It's so easy to shift the blame sideways, like shift the royal racist blame onto Catherine, shift the gagging onto the Sussexes. It's in print, becomes the truth and this might now be the official line.
That's OK. sorry for bring snitty. I really feel for Catherine and just got a bit defensive. I think shes probably at this point focussing all her energy on staying alive for her children.Sorry…badly written post on my part.
I didn’t mean your post was rubbish but the article that says she would welcome them back. I didn’t realise that in hadn’t been included.
Sorry
bwaha ha ha ha ha.Me?" Meg's hands were all a flutter, tousling her naturally straight and lustrous hair.
Just to point something out from this video...Interesting...
Especially as Gill Dando's fiance, Mr Alan Farthing, was the late Queen's surgeon gynecologist to the household.
Here downunder in The Shakey Isles we experience quite a few earthquakes, and I have Meniere's Disease - can confirm that the sensations are revoltingly similar. (Sympathies to fellow vertigo sufferers. And earthquake victims!)YESYESYES @VioletButterfly! I was lying in bed, suddenly felt like the bed was moving (because, yeah, it was) and thought: "Oh shit! My vertigo is back.) I was afraid to get out of bed for hours out of fear of another vertigo attack coming on. I was so relieved to hear later in the news that it was an earthquake.
ETA: Are we absolutely sure that Smegs wasn't in NJ? Your theory makes sense.
My other half, who put me onto this, has a working theory that she tried it on with the chap who was in Dawson's Creek - Joshua Jackson.I have an addendum to my post about MM’s appearance on Fringe. I am convinced that she was fired. She makes an appearance at the beginning of the 2d episode and is in a few scenes, and then disappears without one word explaining her absence. The story line that was being built for her character was just dropped with her character. No reference to her at all. That is weird even for Fringe which is completely about all things weird.
I think that could be right, but it wouldn’t necessarily get her fired. Anna Torv had a thing with the actor who played John Scott and the ended up getting married. It lasted one year. JJ was married to a black actress, then separated and now is with Lupita. He likes WOC.My other half, who put me onto this, has a working theory that she tried it on with the chap who was in Dawson's Creek - Joshua Jackson.
The working theory is that Jackson was a teen heart throb at around the time il Duce would have beenI think that could be right, but it wouldn’t necessarily get her fired. Anna Torv had a thing with the actor who played John Scott and the ended up getting married. It lasted one year. JJ was married to a black actress, then separated and now is with Lupita. He likes WOC.
I very found a clip on YouTube fir those who haven't seen:I have an addendum to my post about MM’s appearance on Fringe. I am convinced that she was fired. She makes an appearance at the beginning of the 2d episode and is in a few scenes, and then disappears without one word explaining her absence. The story line that was being built for her character was just dropped with her character. No reference to her at all. That is weird even for Fringe which is completely about all things weird.
On GofT. Lena Headey and Jerome Flynn had been lovers at some point. It ended badly and there they were on a series together. Headed refused to be in any scene with him and she was the bigger star, so she got what she wanted and you never saw them together. Maybe MM and JJ had a trailer fling that ended badly and she had to go Given how she jumps all over a man if she thinks it would advance her, I can easily believe that she threw herself at him. He was still in his long term relationship with Diane Kruger at that time. If Meghan was bitchy and disruptive, then she had to go. She was dumped.The working theory is that Jackson was a teen heart throb at around the time il Duce would have been26in her teens.
So she'd have got cred points.
But its interesting that you have picked up on what my other half was pointing out that she seemed to be set for a role, and then disappeared.
Absolutely head case! He is obviously mentally ill. Reminds me of Dr Shouty’s letters. I suspected that to be a yarn.I see that wanker Johnathan is a bit fat liar just like Meghan, faking racist accusations.
A Law Student Plays the Race Card - And Gets Busted, Big Time - Above the Law
UPDATE (10/3/2017): We now know much more about what happened to Johnathan Perkins back in 2011 than we did at the time, and it majorly changes how he and the situation should be viewed. See this new story, Was UVA Law Alum Johnathan Perkins Pressured By The FBI Into Recanting His Account Of...abovethelaw.com
I can’t understand why UCLA hired someone so untrustworthy
Anyone can request a super injunction, according to Wikipedia. If you read the grounds for super injunction, it's clear to see that it could have been requested by the Stoats - not saying that it did, but it could.I don't know why Lady C says that press injunctions were done by the Sussexes. Imo this can't be true, they are under the protection of the Palace and it's the Palace who are suppressing the free expression of opinion here. I listened to TRG for the first time, a good video, and she says Harald's suppressing free speech in the US and the Palace are doing it this end.
You can read the whole article here:an interim injunction which restrains a person from: (i) publishing information which concerns the applicant and is said to be confidential or private; and (ii) publicising or informing others of the existence of the order and the proceedings (the ‘super’ element of the order)."
No small wedding for this pair, he wanted what his brother had had and she just wanted to be centre stage with the eyes of the world on her and her alone. I should imagine she was furious when Charles offered to walk her down the aisle ….. a kind gesture on his part so he thought because her father wasn’t going to be present ….. but to her it was just somebody trying to steal her moment of glory.
At Other weddings I have been to the mother has walked the bride down the aisle if the father couldn’t do it for whatever reason, so why not have her mother do it? No, she wanted to do that walk alone ….. this was her big moment and nobody was going to take it from her …… I even think it was she who suggested Charles meet her halfway rather than do the full walk with her.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?