I posted early on i suspected her handDid anyone post this yet?!?!
View attachment 2811454
I posted early on i suspected her handDid anyone post this yet?!?!
View attachment 2811454
He remains in the line of succession as do his childrenWho cares what the harkles and their sugars think about anything? Their views and opinions are immaterial
We will see The Princess of Wales after her recovery- when she is good and ready- and not before. And it's nobody's business but THEIRS.
The harkles aren't part of the United Kingdoms Royal Family any longer & live 6,000 miles away on another Continent. He IS related to our Monarch but doesn't have any part - or say- in our RF. End of Story.
We won't see any - duplicitous pair of cunts that they are.....He remains in the line of succession as do his children
I demand proof of life of the Prince and Princess of L.A
BIB: I haven’t read the whole order yet, but I wanted to address your statement about an appeal.The court did not say she does not have the right to appeal. Rather, the judge dismissed Samantha’s claims “with prejudice”, as she has already amended her complaint multiple times and to allow yet another amendment would be futile. Samantha can still appeal the district court’s decision to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. If she fails at the circuit court level, she can then attempt to appeal to the US Supreme Court. She may not be inclined to file an appeal, though, as appeals can be expensive.How can Judge Honeywell say that everything they said in the interview with Oprah and the Netflix documentary was true. It is definitely dodgy and it makes me wonder if she was paid a lot of money to rule in Meghan's favour and not let Samantha appeal because it seems strange to just close the case without letting the plaintiff appeal. I also don't understand why Judge Honeywell would she say that Samantha had failed to identify any statements that could support a claim for defamation or defamation-by-implication when Samantha herself provided significant evidence to prove defamation. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Your BIB.It's odd that Kate still regularly socialises with Rose despite her allegedly having it away with her husband. Given how friendly they are then perhaps this rumour stems from the press gagging for a box office repeat of Diana versus Camilla/three of us in this marriage but it never manifested and is now kept alive by conspiracy theorists e.g. I read that William fathered one of Roses kids. I read that on a blue tick X account so it is most definitely true (lol).
Rose is married to David Cholmondeley since 2009. July 2016 they host a private fundraiser for a childrens hospice which Kate is a patron of. Pictures are taken of this formal event. One has William and Kate both looking across at Rose. Since it was a private event then W&K attending was indicative of a mutual friendship with R&D. A year later this friendship lead to Rose invited to a Spanish state banquet where she was escorted and seated with Harry. In March '19 an "Exclusive" is written in The Sun by Dan Wooten. Kate tells William she wants Rose "phased out".
It's Diana versus Camilla again everyone! Or not. Remember that this is the same Dan Wooten who conspiracy theorists (and Harry) say is in league with an aide of the Cambridges to leak stories about H&M.
Is it just me thinking that it's odd that the journo they are in cahoots with is betraying their arrangement by writing a sh*t stirring article about their marriage? Wootens exclusive includes quotes from Roses brother about the affair and how her husband, David, is gay. Cue Roses brother swiftly denying this, threatening to sue for libel and slander. Throw in William also threatening legal action and the article is pulled. Whatever happened to print and be damned? Oh right, because it was predicated on nonsense. R&D are private citizens unlike W&K who are well known public "property" (i.e. subjected to inevitable general gossip, rumors and expected to accept that as a consequence of their profile and status). Given the former any such tabloid shenanigans were shut down since they wouldn't last the legal test i.e. if the Sun stood by their reporting then they'd have been successfully sued. It ought to be telling that The Sun pulled the article.
After that article was pulled Giles Coren replied to a user tweet wondering what was going on by saying it is an "affair", that everyone knows about the "affair", even a Jew like himself knows about the "affair". A couple of weeks after the Sun story was pulled Rose became an official patron for the childrens hospice charity mentioned above. She visited the building of a hospice and was photographed at it. Friends showing a united front. However Wootens article (and its removal) now meant that self-appointed reporters (i.e. any attention seeker/grifter with a social media account) were subsequently promising to break this story wide open. The internet never forgetting Wootens article.
Cue a pro-Sussex blogger (Nicole Cliffe) on Twitter fuelled and inspired by Wootens article in a twitter thread consisting of "a great deal of editorialising" i.e. speculating about the rumor. For example, how Prince "think of your three kids!" Harry chewed William out for pulling the same **** their dad had done. She had a Blue Tick so what she was saying must also be true. Despite Cliffe and Coren not having any connection to R&D or W&K all of this was deemed as further confirmation of an affair. However once the rubber hit the road with Coren called out on his confirmation he folded and said he was making it up, had no idea about anything royal, doesn't even know Rose. A couple of years after that he wrote in The Telegraph that he had been at a boozy lunch and was drunk tweeting in the cab on his way home. Cliffe was also called out and wrote in a blog post that she had no special information and she was a private person i.e. I was speculating, theorising and I might be right but wouldn't bet on it because what I've heard could actually be other people also making stuff up and tweeting out loud.
So the proof of this affair rested on Coren who was drunk tweeting for attention, another who was speculating like everyone else and a tabloid story that was quickly retracted following a threat of litigation. To top that off consider Harry writing in Spare about a furious William ringing him up about a tabloid story. The timing (Spring '19) aligns with the Wooten article which was obviously sufficient to warrant such a strong reaction. Harry (not confirming it is specifically that story) writes that it was disgusting, false and not true at all. Since he was also writing about stuff like a physical fight with William it is odd that he didn't take the chance to stir the pot by not exactly denying the rumour. Tina Brown and Robert Lacey who in researching their respective royal books (The Palace Papers, Battle of Brothers) were also unable to find anything substantive about an affair to include it in their books.
Fast forward to the end of 2021 and the story still has legs. Alex Tiffin on Twitter (with his blue tick) tweets that court injunctions issued in London are worthless in Scotland where he is resident and so he will withstand legal pressure against the fact William and Rose had an affair, that journalism trumped a royal afforded legal protection from the truth. It all emerged as tepid tea and Alex, now with hundreds more subscribers to his blog, had successfully executed a grift. This is the same guy who sparked a terror scare in Scotland by texting attendees at a mosque prayer that he wanted to "kill the unbelievables". He was also charged with assaulting a pregnant woman. So the proof for the affair hinges on a journalist with a drinking problem, a terror level raising grifter and a blogger who walked back her opining after getting challenged on it.
Last August Kate, Rose and David were pictured at a rave festival. Because what one does is not only socialise with the woman having an affair with your husband also do it in the presence of the husband she is cheating on.
That this alleged affair is still being drawn up is ridiculous.
View attachment 2811644
Disappointingly Megyn Kelly is fully onboard the speculation train, and her commentator said it’s like a film noir. They reference the same source HIH reference who said the Mother’s Day photo is the same as the Vogue cover kate did.
Urgghh. I don’t know guys. It’s the same woman pulling the same face. All I know is, this whole story is making me feel uncomfortable!
The chick that does T N T UK reckons the boy is Harry's not MMs, born from an affair and at first the mother let them 'use' him for photos etc but has since refused and gone back to the UK. She reckons the girl was a surrogate deal that fell through. She reckons if they were there, they would be used over and over - a narcissist doesn't give up any chance to be centre of attention, showing off kids - especially at the birth.He remains in the line of succession as do his children
I demand proof of life of the Prince and Princess of L.A
Yes I saw that too.I’m in Ireland so not familar with SXSW but looks like the festival has been markled as many music artists seem to be pulling out due to links with weapons manufacturers involved in the Gaza conflict.
This is why no PR agency will ever turn her reputation around. She has no self control and can't help being a witch and putting people down in an attempt to make herself look perfect. I love how many times she fucks it upLooks like some of you were right.
It's starting...
View attachment 2812069
View attachment 2812071
View attachment 2812070
Harry and Meghan face hypocrisy row as it emerges snap from her secon…
archived 13 Mar 2024 01:27:55 UTCarchive.ph
One of my cousins and a former classmate make exactly the same pose in all photos, no matter the place or situation. One of them has had two children and her body has changed so much, but when she does that pose, she looks exactly the same as she did 15 years ago when I first met her in college. And I've seen it live IRL, so she's not compositing the photos. Nor does she have the skills or inclination to spend money on getting it doneIt’s not the same picture!! Many people take the same picture! My husband comes out the same in almost every photo. We joke that it’s not really him in photos, just a cardboard cutout.
Awaiting a Thursday pap walk ...........I notice this is added to kensington palace official posts
View attachment 2811938
Freakish attention to detail but walks around in creased clothing? I don’t think so woman!!Looks like some of you were right.
It's starting...
View attachment 2812069
View attachment 2812071
View attachment 2812070
Harry and Meghan face hypocrisy row as it emerges snap from her secon…
archived 13 Mar 2024 01:27:55 UTCarchive.ph