WTF is wrong with Baroness Bruck lately? I’m not referring to this tweet but others.
She is absolutely 100% setting him up so she can divorce him asap.
Agree, the whole half cocked plan was based on half in half out. When the Queen said HELL NO, they were arrogant enough to do it anyway. At that point they were still with Sunshine Sucks who probably blew a load of smoke up the Twats asses based on the deals already coming in (Netflix, Spotify) and promised them they would be Beyoncé level MEGASTAHS. Then they stupidly did the Oprah interview, made a load of easily debunkable claims, started out on a massive negative, exposed themselves as liars and ultra privileged hypocrites, and set their own downfall in motion. Their ‘work‘ exposed their utter lack of talent (The Stench, Archeshites) while the Spare and Netflix were just more spiteful, lie-filled hatchet jobs on their Families. Yet we’re supposed to buy them as humanitarians (of which they’ve done next to fuck all).They didn’t think they would have to fund themselves! Their utter indignation at the loss of publicly funded security and Pa’s money made it clear they had assumed all that would continue. They believed they could keep both and go earn hundreds of millions on top. Keep the perks without doing the job. The taxpayer and KCIII were expected to be their safety net in the exciting new billionaire world they were charging into! They are the most clueless, arrogant, over privileged, entitled pair of pricks I’ve come across.
My friend and I are hosting a Coronation Party and are having great fun planning it. I’ve bought a life size cardboard King Charles (for photos with the King) and we have individual masks of Charles and Camilla, bunting, tablerunners, a golden carriage that will hold little cakes…and a big crown to top a bigger cake! I did see a Harry/Meghan dartboard online but there might be one or two guests ‘offended.’I have been toying with the idea of not watching, but, I have decided to definitely watch.
It's history in the making and we are alive to see it.
The real life Game of Thrones, really, isn't it?
One thing is sure: this not someone traumatised by the clicks of paparazzi.
Oh how I want to slap that ugly face
I so agree with Catherine. I was lucky enough to spend the first five years at home with my children (mums didn’t work then, another tale) but it was so valuable.Thanks @LadyMuck A change of tack here.
A long discourse about a parcel B/W collected which contained old family books which made her very happy.
On the Stoats there's an astonishing range of differing opinions and B/W hasn't seen anything like this before.
Discussion of Catherine's Early Years project, no wokery and Catherine is right that these years are so important. It's a valuable endeavour and Catherine takes it very seriously.
William and Catherine will be a practical and hands-on King and Queen, and Catherine is fast becoming a force to be reckoned with. Some people say that they're not ready to be King and Queen, they need to spend time with their children, but B/W doesn't agree. They are ready, and the sooner the better because they will bring style, decorum and quiet duty back to the Monarchy.
Wow. This is why I hate politicians. Back in the 80s I once spoke to the mayor of NYC on a radio show. it was mayor koch I think. I said I was worried about all the subway violence, my husband rode it every day and it was a real sewer. He robustly told me he was very happy I asked that, it gave him an opportunity to publicize his new program to keep graffiti off the trains. If the subway looked better, people would act better. His answer to the muggings, and stabbings sand shootings was a bucket of soapy water and some elbow grease. So I’m not surprised the MP responded almost positively to the errant Prince’s illegal drug use. I wonder how he’d explain away Harold’s proclivity to hurting sex workers. ‘In an attempt to make the city less attractive to sex workers, if you’re a royal Ginger Prick, it’s open Season on Hos’.Thanks for new thread and great title.
I wrote to my MP to say that I thought the govt and the various parties should make a statement condemning Haz's statements on psychedelics and other drugs. And I got a reply!! My MP refuses to condemn Haz bringing attention to the work being done in the field of mental health and the usefulness of psychedelics. Waffle, waffle, waffle.
Now I actually agree that psychedelics may be beneficial in the field of mental health. As someone with mental illness, I've paid attention to the research being done. As a Witch, I've also studied the use of psychedelics in various religious rites around the world. I'm all for knowledge.
But I will respond to my MP, saying that and asking him if he thinks that prince haz is the right person to talk about it? I'll point out that people suffering psychological distress who listen to him are not going to wait for permission from their GP. They're not going to wait for the medical trials to be over. This will lead them onto a path that is potentially fatal and definitely illegal.
A little knowledge is a very dangerous thing. As research grows in this area, a huge responsibility is attached. Its the irresponsibility of haz that needs to be condemned.
I'm thinking of adding something about how you only have to look at him to see that he is not a good advert for drug consumption, but I'd quite like to make the reply more academic and I think commenting on his appearance looks too much like a personal attack. What do you all think? Add it or not?
William was always and is the better-looking one, in my opinion