She started young !Carpet burns probably!
She started young !Carpet burns probably!
OMG! you're reading my thoughts!To be honest, so far the person who looks bad is Diana.
I mean its not great for the whole family but we expected worse for them so this is tame... Diana though
Now I am on the episode where her friend's husband was getting HEART surgery and Diana of course comes to keep her company. Nice. But then the doctor (Khan) comes to tell her friend that the surgery went well, but he will need another immediate surgery. As he leaves, her friend is clearly distraught but Diana is asking her whether she thought he was attractive, starts to describe his eyes and ethnicityAnd then she starts going to the hospital daily. Harry really signed a deal with a company that is portraying his mother as dick crazy
Meanwhile poor little William is at Eton, worried about his mother and the Queen notices that. I am glad they added that part about how Diana burdened him so much.
yip deffo look like different children !Comparing the Archie at the Christening to the Archie in South Africa and it doesn't look like the same child as the ears are different, the nose looks different, the mouth looks different and the child looks like it has more hair in the Christening photo than the South Africa photo.
View attachment 1724984View attachment 1724993
Nah, that looks like the same baby to me, same ears and eyes, and a hand with 4 fingers and no thumb. He is a cute baby, too cute to be related to the reeks.Comparing the Archie at the Christening to the Archie in South Africa and it doesn't look like the same child as the ears are different, the nose looks different, the mouth looks different and the child looks like it has more hair in the Christening photo than the South Africa photo.
View attachment 1724984View attachment 1724993
Archie's thumb is more prominent in this video of them in South Africa whereas in the Christening photo you can't see it as it is hidden.Nah, that looks like the same baby to me, same ears and eyes, and a hand with 4 fingers and no thumb. He is a cute baby, too cute to be related to the reeks.
Because they have been told that is true by Meghan’s PR people.Duchess of Narsussex
I find this hard to believe but why are the DM reporting it?
EXCLUSIVE: Tickets to gala with Meghan and Harry sell for $1MILLION # via https://android.com
Hahah, made me think of thisHowever, everyone knows that any cat in real life would have that tree pulled down after five minutes and the dog would be ripping into the wrapping paper on the prezzies.
Is Charles wearing a poppy in that photo?? But the other men are not??The photo that was released on the Archewell site which actually taken by Chris Allerton who is also known for photoshopping his pictures as he took Archie's Christening photos where there was no reflection in the mirror and it turned out that there were many other things wrong with the photo, he also took the photo of the Queen meeting Archie in which Tom Bower described it as looking at a shawl and he also took Harry and Meghan's wedding photos.
View attachment 1724727
She looks like she’s taking a piss up an alley after getting down to some shag nasties on her dirty kneesIs she squatting to go to the loo?
![]()
the christening was in July so I doubt he is wearing a poppyIs Charles wearing a poppy in that photo?? But the other men are not??
No I think it's a special broach that he has as he was wearing the exact same one at Louis Christening plus his suit is the same one that he was wearing at Archie's Christening and Camilla is wearing a necklace and hat that is similar, but it is different to the one's that she was wearing at Archie's Christening although the necklace isn't actually that different as the design is the same but the one in Archie's christening is shorter than the one in Louis chistening.Is Charles wearing a poppy in that photo?? But the other men are not??
Unless he was photoshopped in from another pic taken in November?the christening was in July so I doubt he is wearing a poppy
Exactly this. It’s so easy to look back with hindsight but he was a huge star at the time and because of all the good stuff he did and his eccentricity, everyone looked past hisSaville fooled many people including Charles with all his charity work.
This idea that everyone knew what he was up to and covered it up is revisionist crap.
Some people knew he was 'handy' with the young girls on TOTP but then most of the other DJs were the same.
If MI5 had any inkling of Savilles real depravity then they would have warned him, but thinking someone is a creep and proving what they've done is another matter. Saville was a powerful man who bullied his victims into silence telling them they wouldn't be believed.
oh, after this season, seeing Di removed of her charities... kind of makes our Smegsy a benign annoyance. i feel bad for Diana, which i never envisioned myself to say. yet... she is the ultimate villain of the season, after PP.Makes you wonder if Nutflux have done this on purpose to the Diana character just to wind up Sparry and TW! Can see them all having a good laugh at the expense of the Gruesomes. ‘Revenge’ you say …… this is what it looks like when you mess about with Netflix.![]()