Oh yes you're quite right
Oh yes you're quite rightI didn't realise until I was on Facebook last night what she's done here STC has long since been Princess Annes main charity ,she was at one time the President of it ,and now in muscles Meg ,I can't see Anne being happy or holding back in telling her she's not happy
Twitter is a dreadful cesspit of the ill informed SJW keyboard warrior brigade these days. Recent personal example being a girl I was friends with at high school, who had accused the organisers of Eurovision of being homophobic because they scheduled some sort of event for the same day as a well known gay comic con event she had been hoping to attend. I’m still trying to get my head around that one.Emily Giffin is getting so much hate on twitter. https://www.etonline.com/author-emi...ing-meghan-markle-unmaternal-and-phony-146126
She shouldn’t have to apologise for this. It isn’t as though she was racist, sexist etc. She should be allowed her opinion.Emily Giffin is getting so much hate on twitter. https://www.etonline.com/author-emi...ing-meghan-markle-unmaternal-and-phony-146126
I agree with every word she says. I was also a fan of Meghan and stuck up for her on social media and privately.Emily Giffin is getting so much hate on twitter. https://www.etonline.com/author-emi...ing-meghan-markle-unmaternal-and-phony-146126
She would. In an enormous black hat, skin tight black dress and the appropriate.....'Nobody's asked me if I'm ok about my father dying' expression.I think it's a bit late for poor old Thomas but he would look better id he lost some weight. We haven't seen him for ages so he might have lost some weight following his heart surgery.
I still can't believe that a daughter would treat her sick dad the way she has done. I wonder if she would actually turn up at his funeral if he passed away.
Hmm.....is she a cold, self-absorbed drama queen, with the parenting skills of an egg bound cuckoo?Interesting choice of book. Made me immediately think she is trying to get across a message of how people view her.
One animal/person can be seen as something totally different depending on who is looking.
Or in her case, she changes her appearance/mannerisms depending on who is watching.
Should read Saving ArchieScoobie's tweet about it has a couple of other photos and also mentions Save The Children.
I agree, the story reading seems far more aimed at us the viewer, than the baby.
Save with Stories | Save the Children UK
Every donation to Save with Stories will help the children and families who’ve been hardest hit by the coronavirus crisis, both in the UK and around the world.www.savethechildren.org.uk
Oh dear Save The Children. What have you done, associating with Smeghan.
notice how once again, the video quality is shit, despite being alleged to have been filmed on Harry's phone which one would expect to be reasonably up to date, and looks like a soft filter has been applied.
I have always thought the sameOh I completely agree; by accident of birth the poor child didn't choose his parentage and it is no fault of anyone that he has a 'defect'.....
However...
...
Rightly or (more) wrongly, it absolutely tickles me pink to think how much it will catch MeAgain in her craw that she hasn't got what she would perceive to be the perfect photogenic offspring
Thomas should have just burned that letter!And remember, remember, remember that Omid Scobie said on TV that Meghan's letter to her father was written with the public in mind. Always meant to be leaked. It was not a genuine letter - it was written for her public image, to portray her in a good light. Never forget!!
They definitely are, Princess Megan ppffftYes there's already been a discussion about his eye if you go back a few pages.
I feel more sorry for him having Smeghan as a mother.
I bet that video was taped some time ago and that Archie didn't have any video call with his British cousins on his birthday.
The sugars are frighteningly weird and most seem really dumb especially the ones that call her Princess Meghan and are sure she will be Queen someday.
I can't work out if they are just trolling for a laugh or are trying to bring down the monarchy. Some have been whipped up by the cries of racism in to some sort of a strange race war. I find it baffling.
That's the problem with Twitter. Everyone is entitled to express their opinion, but only if it's the 'correct' one. Anyone veering from the SJW script gets torn to pieces.Archie definitely looks like Thomas Markle to me as well, it must be haunting Meghan.
She shouldn’t have to apologise for this. It isn’t as though she was racist, sexist etc. She should be allowed her opinion.
I agree Freda. The whole tone of the H&M tread has changed recently from funny to being lectured.Incoming rant.
Oh FFS the comments on his googly eye only come in short bursts when his owners deign to grace us with his image and it's no different to mocking his dad's gingerness (which someone else tried to get made a punishable offence many threads ago).
Or his ma's deconstructed/reconstructed chemically fucked up hair (which again someone threw a racist wobbly over).
Or his ma's manky feet, which we batter mercilessly because it's her achilles heel (and toes).
Or his daddy's bald spot/thumb print.
We all have imperfections and if you imagine that people are not commenting on them behind your back then I have a fabulous bridge I can sell you at a bargain price.
It's sad that some of us(or our kids) might have something considered slightly imperfect, like feet covered in bumps and scars, or hair that we choose to adjust with chemicals to suit our wants, or big bald patches on our heads, or chicken legs. But them's the breaks and don't ever ever think they won't be getting commented on somewhere in private, and if it involves your child being bullied at school then go haul the school over the coals and make them address the issue instead of trying to control a group of (admittedly bitchy) adults on a forum your child will not be reading.
Archiedoll cannot read. He won't give a shiny shite what a coven of witches like us say about his googly eye.
It's crazy, people pop up all "ooh freedom to say what we think, luverly" , and then start trying to censor comments.
Drama llama she certainly is!
The mystery book Archie reached for.
OK children love all kinds of books, but this one is just a badly drawn cartoon.A few people commenting on the book being black and white - black and white is recommended for babies up to a certain age. The content of the book looks like it doesn't correlate with the design. But it'll be very on-trend for the modern parents who like to keep all their baby stuff minimalist so it doesn't look out of place at home. I can't imagine this little boy having anything like a traditional royal rocking horse or whatever his Dad was used to. And probably no baby sized army gear like he had, either!
I don't know if that will be of any relevance to the court case though as basically it's just the slimebags opinion.And remember, remember, remember that Omid Scobie said on TV that Meghan's letter to her father was written with the public in mind. Always meant to be leaked. It was not a genuine letter - it was written for her public image, to portray her in a good light. Never forget!!
Yep! It has to be a crap cartoon in black and white because in colour there would be ZERO confusion!OK children love all kinds of books, but this one is just a badly drawn cartoon.
Since when has there been any confusion about the difference between a duck and a rabbit? The cartoon doesn't even look like either creature, unless you really stretch it! Its just trying to hard to be clever and meaningful!
She can walk around barefoot if she wants. It’s not as if we are gonna slag off her manky hobbit feet...Oh waitShe must be so raging that she can't go full on "Earth Mother" and walk around barefoot, wearing cheesecloth (not sack cloth, that's what she's dressing Harry in!). Those clodhoppers don't really fit in with the style!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?