Bubblesdahling
VIP Member
Now this is the what she should have released to the press![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
Here’s my perspective. I’m an American…no expert on the British monarchy…but reading quotes of th Oprah interview, I knew she was telling lies. I knew why Archie had no title…why didn’t Markle, married to a Prince. I knew why their security was pulled, it was paid by taxpayers…and they were certainly rich enough to cover costs themselves. I was nauseated when she made the race remark…but later his timing of the remark was different than hers. That was just the beginning of my disgust.I completely understand that, but both Harry and Meghan stated that the issues they had, had nothing to do with The Queen & Prince Philip. I’m just wondering why everyone is so obsessed with the fact they called the baby Lilibet, when really they spoke of the people behind the scenes that we don’t know. No hate and don’t come at me I am genuinely curious. It’s common knowledge that Harry and The Queen have had a very, very close bond so why shouldn’t he be allowed to name his child after her.
I just want to add that I know Lilibet is The Queens nickname that was used by family who are now all sadly passed away.
William and Catherine are respectful of the Monarchy and follow the rules. They don't trash TQ by proxy then use her personal name without permission, then licence it for merching. İntention and sincerity is all. Smeg and Hazzno are disordered trash with no boundaries or sensibilities, and deserve to be treated like trash.I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
I posted a similar reply to a similarly confused person on this thread yesterday. The Queen asked for the name Lilibet not to be used after her husband's death. It was his private name for Her Majesty, and she wanted to keep the name Lilibet locked away for the rest of her life along with the memories of her husband of 70 years. She let this wish be known and it should have been respected but it wasn't.All this fuss over a stupid name. No offence to anyone but I don’t understand it. Do members of the Royal Family usually have to get permission to use a name?
It is not hard to understand why there would be a different reaction.I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
Whether it is the Royal family or anyone else's family it is an invasive thing to do. For a family member with a private nickname dating to their own childhood that is used by only a very few select people, it is bizarre for someone else in that family to then use that name for their own child.All this fuss over a stupid name. No offence to anyone but I don’t understand it. Do members of the Royal Family usually have to get permission to use a name?
Let me put it this way. Your grandad has recently died, during his last illness you publicly bad mouthed your family and allowed people to believe your grandad was a racist. You attend the funeral where your granddad's coffin holds a wreath signed by your grandma with the nickname your grandad used for her.All this fuss over a stupid name. No offence to anyone but I don’t understand it. Do members of the Royal Family usually have to get permission to use a name?
Leave it to the Americans to get their knickers in a twist about women making the choice to have an abortion or not. Sex Education, contraceptive and access to abortions if necessary are not the same as being pro-Abortion (most people think it’s a necessary evil but not a great thing). It’s not as if they would run around and pressure people to have one. Whoever is that interested in the uteruses of strangers should step back and rethink their life choices. H&M do lots of shitty things but that’s just stupid. As if it wasn’t possible to criticise for actual bad actions."HarrysGreySuit on Twitter: "Prince Harry And Meghan Markle Welcome Baby Girl By Asking For Donations To Pro-Abortion Organization!You can’t fix stupid
https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
Let’s say you have a beloved family heirloom…a piece of jewelry that has tremendous sentimental value to you. This heirloom brings back precious memories of loved ones you have lost and private times in your life that you treasure as your own.I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
A palace source would never have revealed such personal and private information without the Queens knowledge or approval.Prince Harry slams claims he ‘didn’t ask’ the Queen if he could name his daughter ‘Lilibet’The Duke's baby girl is named after his grandmother
By
Kendra Becker | Editor
-
June 9, 2021SHARE
Prince Harry has slammed claims he didn’t ask the Queen if he could name his daughter ‘Lilibet’.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex welcomed their second child, Lilibet “Lili” Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, on June 4.
Their daughter is affectionately named after her great-grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, whose family nickname is Lilibet.
After the couple announced the birth of their baby girl, a Palace source told the BBC that Harry and Meghan never asked the Queen about naming their daughter Lilibet.
However, a spokesperson for the Sussexes’ has since disputed the report.
In a statement, the spokesperson said: “The Duke spoke with his family in advance of the announcement – in fact his grandmother was the first family member he called.”
“During that conversation, he shared their hope of naming their daughter Lilibet in her honour. Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name.”
Lilibet is the Queen’s 11th great-grandchild, and they’ve already been introduced via video call.
Harry and Meghan announced the birth of their second child on Sunday.
In a statement, their press secretary confirmed: “It is with great joy that Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, welcome their daughter, Lilibet ‘Lili’ Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, to the world.”
“Lili was born on Friday, June 4 at 11:40 a.m. in the trusted care of the doctors and staff at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital in Santa Barbara, CA.”
“She weighed 7 lbs 11 oz. Both mother and child are healthy and well, and settling in at home.”
“Lili is named after her great-grandmother, Her Majesty The Queen, whose family nickname is Lilibet. Her middle name, Diana, was chosen to honor her beloved late grandmother, The Princess of Wales,” the statement added.
Ad
Ohhhhhh Montishithole are a little crossps do their PR/ press office work 24/7
![]()
There's not a single country on the planet (that has ever held influence) who hasn't got loads of murkyness in their past. Slavery has been going on since the dawn of time all over the world including the British being slaves to the romans at one time.I am starting to think this new woke stuff is a subtle coup, it's all about putting soil over history. We all know England's history of slavery but if you dig a bit further back you can find Jewish slaves, etc. It's not all about one skin-colour on this planet. A lot of people have suffered from all across the globe throughout history but the West specific gets the blame because it's actually fairly functioning and affluent. And of course the far east can do no wrong. Japan are a disgusting country too but i hear nobody mentioning their role in various crimes of slavery, war & colonisation.