I must remember to put my glasses on before reading post
"un authentic" and insincere M is especially in the coop.
I read that as in the CO - OP
I must remember to put my glasses on before reading postI think the rumour about Orca not taking MM's calls anymore are true. She may have been told about about M and the moon bump, and feels like an absolute chump and knows when this comes out she could look really stupid. I bet she's re watched the debacle and thinks, it was an actual shit show and how "un authentic" and insincere M is especially in the coop. And as for H well quite honestly he is a premier cru tosspot and showed himself up as such.
Also, Gayle making that sickening query with her side kick on her news show, about whether or not PP died of natural causes i.e. not as a result of the shock of the devastating attack on the RF and HMTQ i. She was trying to underscore the point to help her pal Porka that PP didn't die as a result of the interview. Honestly, can you really stoop that low? Well yes, it seems you can
Nicely put !The royal family were always well aware of SSS with Harry and Andrew for that matter. There used to be a lot of articles about it when he was growing up and being caught smoking weed and the Nazi uniform etc.
When Harry *seemed* to be doing well in the army there was talk that PC would be happy if Harry decided to become a career officer and not a full time working royal. Of course that went out when he pitched a fit about having to do a desk job.
Harry was given opportunities to make his own mark and he and Meghan were given a lot of prestigious patronages and jobs that ensured that though they weren't equal to William and Kate, that they would have their own sphere and they weren't exactly relegated to opening primary school sports halls in Grimsby.
But that wasn't enough for them and couldn't mask the fact that he was never going to get the top job unless something tragic happened to his brother's family. And he wouldn't have wanted it anyway - something he made clear before he met Meghan. He just wanted, as he still does, all the perks of senior royalty combined with being able to do whatever he wants. It's not like he's the only one in the family that has had to deal with that. Almost all of them have and they've managed to do meaningful work and personal lives without "having" to tell the world "their truth".
Meghan just seemed to think she was going to be her idol Diana and didn't realise that she was the Fergie in that situation.
That poster was being ridiculous, imo.Can I ask the experienced Tattlers on here, am I not to use t he words, slapper.slut,tart or Shagbag in regard to an earlier post who found it offensive? do not wish to stir things up but would hate to cause offence to anyone.
Thanks to anyone who can let me know
I studied Women’s Studies in the 90’sThe thing I love about the photo with the 7 grandchildren is how natural the Queen looks holding Louis. She's clearly a woman with a lot of experience holding babies. Contrast that with Megain trying to hold on to Archie as she read a story.
Also I think it's far more likely that Charlotte has middle child syndrome rather than spare heir syndrome. I seriously doubt that she knows what an heir is, let alone that she's the spare one.
That's odd. I quite clearly remember using the term misogyny back in the 1970's. And the 80's/90's etc. It's pretty much been in constant use since the 1950's when hatred towards women began to be remarked upon. In fact there's a whole academic genre devoted to it.
Evidence of misogyny goes back centuries but perhaps you're not a history fan.
The vast majority of people are aware of it. Particularly women, many of whom have suffered it or at least know of women who have.
It doesn't compare with 'sexist' or 'non PC' because it's about hatred. And it has absolutely nothing to do with Trump.
I think we should all just stick to saying what we think and roll with the reactions we get, good and not so good, without anyone having to leave.Can I ask the experienced Tattlers on here, am I not to use t he words, slapper.slut,tart or Shagbag in regard to an earlier post who found it offensive? do not wish to stir things up but would hate to cause offence to anyone.
Thanks to anyone who can let me know
Well, that is a very interesting interpretation and various posters have commented the set up of that whole montage made no sense but I hadn’t even thought about the book title... if true they are even more crazy than I thought!It looked like a threat to me, based on the duck-rabbit illusion
Under philosophy and politics. It looked like the book was the only relevant thing there, and that she didn't want to distract from it.
Ha ! That really is perfect - if only she understood what it meant !Megs being likened to hyacinth bucket with her delusions of grandeur.
Harry and Meghan can’t hold a candle to Prince Philip
He showed the self-obsessed duo what a life of public service really looks like.www.spiked-online.com
And written by Julie Burchill no less.Ha ! That really is perfect - if only she understood what it meant !
Can't even get close to imagining an interview between JB and MM.......suspect it would be delicious.And written by Julie Burchill no less.
They are completely cuckoo and desperateI'm loving all the sugars losing their shit on twitter because there's no pictures of Archie. It's like me kicking off because they've not released pictures of me and Philip chilling over a banger. You can’t do something if it never happened
From what I can remember, at the time of Princess Diana's death in 1997 it was because of some of Tony Blair's advice, that the Royal Family were able to survive the horrendous backlash they received, about the way they handled Diana's death. Don't get me wrong, I am no fan of Tony Blair, but it seems that a number of people are keen to rewrite history at the moment.Maybe, but there might be more to it:
Queen’s fury with Tony Blair as PM ‘snubbed for knighthood'
QUEEN ELIZABETH II was reportedly enraged when Tony Blair spoke out about their private meetings - and it has been claimed this blunder may still be having an impact on the former Prime Minister's chances of securing a knighthood.www.express.co.uk
Blair shattered ego, is documented in his books.Prince Philip told Tony Blair's team to 'f*** off' during row over Diana's funeral
Duke of Edinburgh was reportedly furious at suggestion William and Harry should walk behind mother's coffin 'to show Royals cared'www.independent.co.uk
But neither is it a s/he who shouts loudest and longest wins.I haven’t seen anyone “piling on” posters re H&M on DS. Not saying it hasn’t happened but, despite what you seem to think, I have not been “super supportive” and didn’t post about them that often and my posts were generally about the fact that I thought they were handling their PR disastrously. I also felt Piers Morgan was letting his personal issue with Meghan lead him to sounding like he was bizarrely obsessed with her.
If people want to believe Archie is a doll they are entitled to and I’m entitled to say I find that ridiculous. If they want to call me a Sugar Nut, that’s fine with me.
To be honest I find the whole adversarial nature of the H&M issue silly with people calling each other names and getting enraged about people none of us know.
You seem to have a particular issue with me. I honestly don’t know why. Maybe we clashed on DS or something. I don’t know because I don’t know who you are as you must have had a different name on there. Anyway yes, let’s agree to disagree.I have no desire to enter into a personal spat with anyone and I’m not going to. I’m just here to contribute to discussions I find interesting. I don’t expect people to always agree with me but neither will I be pressurised into not saying what I think because some people might not like it. Discussion isn’t about everyone agreeing with each other.
You can use whatever you like, if people get offended perhaps they should stick to reading the alphabet backwards, and not Tattle. Although slut, slapper and tart are quite mild really when it comes to Megsy, I think @freda19's favourite word is far more suitable and correct in this case.Can I ask the experienced Tattlers on here, am I not to use t he words, slapper.slut,tart or Shagbag in regard to an earlier post who found it offensive? do not wish to stir things up but would hate to cause offence to anyone.
Thanks to anyone who can let me know
This the one that really grinds my gears:You know what really pissed me off? When she said in the interview about Kate being called 'wait Katie' what a shitty, underhanded little dig. You Meghan, wish you had 1% of the class our beautiful Duchess of Cambridge has.
Have to say I agree with you on this one. I think Haz was overindulged because of Charles' guilt over the death of Diana. Probably a natural reaction at first but should have been tempered with common sense. Nobody was doing Harry any favours by indulging him.I'm fucking sick to death of some posters blaming Diana for all of Harry's cuntish ways. She's been dead for 25 years, twice the age that Harry was when she died. How is it her fault that he was overindulged and spoilt after the age of twelve. He did have another parent, Grandparents and other family members, there is a collective responsibility for how Harry has turned out and I don't think that the result can purely blamed on Diana.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?