Oh! Oh! Can you play this one please?
Oh! Oh! Can you play this one please?I'm always available for serenading with a tiny violin!
View attachment 519887
You know what ? Why couldn’t they just lay low, not buy 11 million mansion and lived the life of privacy they harped on about when justifying their shitting all over what the RF had afforded them and which he sees as his birth right ?“Police have been called to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's £11millon California mansion nine times in as many months, it has been revealed.”
How convenient for them. “SEE, SEE!” hear them scream. “We TOLD Pa we still needed security!”
That was an April fool on one of the Irish newspapers.Re Lady C, I didn't know there is talk of M being cast as a red headed Irishwoman in the remake of The Quiet One originally played by Maureen O'Hara. Bet Freda will be pleased lol
I have a musical flea who might...Oh! Oh! Can you play this one please?
That has to be a late April fools joke! Can you imagine her doing an Irish accentRe Lady C, I didn't know there is talk of M being cast as a red headed Irishwoman in the remake of The Quiet One originally played by Maureen O'Hara. Bet Freda will be pleased lol
Didn't she set up some pap shots when they went out to dinner with "friends" who seem to have dropped them !Where are these pap shots? I haven't seen any. I'm sure she's in hiding anyway with the moonbump
It is (look at last paragraphThat has to be a late April fools joke! Can you imagine her doing an Irish accent
Please don't insult the Irish
Didn't she set up some pap shots when they went out to dinner with "friends" who seem to have dropped them !
Hello @Mrs_Darcy - fantastic Deutsche Tee there thank you very very much! That's surprisingly balanced...Good afternoon fellow Tattlers,
since a lot of you are interested in the international reactions to Meghan's and Harry's interview, I decided to post a summary of a long article in one of the premier German tabloids (Gala), that I read yesterday at the doctor's.
First I want to say, that the covering of Meghan and Harry has been nearly completely positive by the German tabloids, so I was positively surprised what I read:
The article started with the Queen. It stated that the Queen is worried sick about Prince Philip's health (Gala is a monthly tabloid, so the information is not up to date) and that the interview came at a really bad time. The journalist wrote, that the Queen was so stressed because of Prince Philip's health and the antics of Meghan and Harry, that she had to buy herself some corgi-puppies for her mental health.
Then they had different paragraphs, where they stated the main statements of the two in normal print and in cursive what the writer of the article thought about their claims.
Since you all know by heart, what the two claimed, I will just write down the opinion of the journalist:
-The author of the article does not believe, that senior courtiers denied Meghan help, when she asked for help because of her suicidal thoughts. Additionally, the journalist thinks, that Meghan should have asked the Queen, because she claimed to be so close to her.
-Prince Charles probably stopped taking Prince Harry's calls, because Harry wore his father's patience thin.
-The author thinks, that Prince Harry violated his brother's/father's boundaries, when he claimed they were trapped. He can say that for himself, but not for others
-Princess Diana would be horrified, that Prince Harry has fallen out with his brother
-The author thinks Meghan's claim of not googling the Royal Family/Prince Harry is not credible for such a strong feminist
-The only time where the article is pro Meghan is when the journalist states, that "racism is wrong" but regarding Meghan's claim that Archie was not a prince because he is mixed race he writes that according to the rules of King Edward he would not be entitled to this style until Charles is king
The article is rounded off with a big box titled "Meghan Markle: Angle or Devil?" where the allegations of staff-bullying (with a photo of Jason Knauf) and allegations regarding the earrings of the Saudi Prince (another photo of her wearing the earrings in Australia) are written about.
Also there is a big photo of Wallis Simpson wearing a dress similar to her interview-dress is shown and the author writes, that she paid tribute to Wallis Simpson with the dress she wore.
Ahhh...I'm guessing that was Uncle Flynn, he's a bit of a character.... went off on a bender muttering profanities about the HarklesGlad you’re safe @Scotch Mist
We found one of your compatriots in our garden yesterday, having a very long sleep. No idea how he got there or where he came from (and I’m not knocking on doors this time as I did for the fecking cat!)
That was on the way to Lucky's in Santa Barbara, allegedly to meet David Foster and Katherine McPhee, who weren't pictured. That was the last time the 'close friendship' with the Fosters was mentioned, as Katharine announced she was pregnant the next week. For some reason, Megzy wasn't keen on having a friendship with a pregnant woman. Why could that be?That has to be a late April fools joke! Can you imagine her doing an Irish accent
Please don't insult the Irish
Didn't she set up some pap shots when they went out to dinner with "friends" who seem to have dropped them !
Wasn’t that the friend (and I may be wrong here, so apologies if I am misremembering) who had just had a miscarriage and mm wore a floaty shirt which made her look pregnant and started rumoursThat has to be a late April fools joke! Can you imagine her doing an Irish accent
Please don't insult the Irish
Didn't she set up some pap shots when they went out to dinner with "friends" who seem to have dropped them !
#gifted, #sponsored, #byob .... #effoffThey need to stop this security shite.. no one cares about them....
Also if they are so poor and need to beg British people for security for just 3 of them during lockdown... how are they planning to pull off 200 guest bash they are planning? That's gonna cost 100 times more with guest they mentioned.... what's on the invite 'bring your own food and security with you' ?
Thank you @Kittypops and @Grannyapple68 .Morning Tattlers. Thanks for new thread x
"Meghan Markle 'will fight back' against Piers Morgan after his stinging remarks - Mirror Online" https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/meghan-markle-will-fight-back-23873138.amp
That teeny tiny violin is probably the workof Willard Wigan,who makes incredible things in the eye of needles. Worth looking him up,you will be amazed....and it makes a change from those 2 Snarkles.Oh! Oh! Can you play this one please?
I dunno if anyone's following the comments on this story (and apols if it's already been mentioned, I had to skip a few pages to keep up) but check out this comment if you sort by Best Comments. Is it true, has she tried this before?Oh here we go again with the 'taxpayers need to pay for our security' blackmail PR...
Meghan and Harry had police called to their US mansion 9 times in 9 months
Since Meghan Markle and Prince Harry moved in to their Montecito home with Archie in July last year, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office has responded to calls listed as phone requests, alarm activations and property crimeswww.mirror.co.uk
Police have been called to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Southern California mansion nine times in as many months, official figures reveal.
Since Harry and Meghan moved in to their Montecito home with one-year-old son Archie in July last year, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office has responded to calls listed as phone requests, alarm activations and property crimes.
The data, obtained under Freedom of Information laws by the PA news agency, was released after the couple shared their security fears in their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Officers were called four times in July last year after Harry and Meghan moved to Montecito from Los Angeles, where they had been temporarily living since leaving Canada at the start of the pandemic.
So if you decode this, their alarm was triggered by something (e.g. wildlife) a few time which didn't result in a callout or visit. Not unusual with burglar alarms if you have a cat. The police seem to have visited the property twice, which were the Christmas day incident when someone was wandering around the garden. They've already put out PR for that one.
In the real world, there were 402,000 burglaries in England and Wales last year. Actual break-ins, not someone wandering through the garden. Good luck even getting the police to turn out for them. So why exactly are the Harkles supposed to be uniquely at risk? All this PR actually says is that they have been living in Montecito for nearly a year, no-one's broken into their house (if they live there) and their service from the local police is far, far better than any UK citizen would get.
Why would you not let her send a letter?? My dear tattler, a letter is the only way she can show off her mad calligraphy skills in the hopes that one day it falls into the hands of MOS! Then MOS can show it to the world and she can SUE without testifying! OH THE DRAMA!Sending fucking letters AGAIN?! What is it with her bs epistolary incontinence. I mean an email, OK. A letter via her lawyers , yup. Why not a carrier pigeon or smoke signals or telegram or morse code. Harry seems to have an in with the Nazis so he could ask for an enigma machine. No one writes letters anymore unless they're marketing their calligraphy ski.... oh wait
Yes.I dunno if anyone's following the comments on this story (and apols if it's already been mentioned, I had to skip a few pages to keep up) but check out this comment if you sort by Best Comments. Is it true, has she tried this before?
View attachment 520124
Didn’t she tie something like this in with the early days of dating Harry? ‘I’m so vulnerable, I need you to make our relationship official and announce it so that I get the right protection’I dunno if anyone's following the comments on this story (and apols if it's already been mentioned, I had to skip a few pages to keep up) but check out this comment if you sort by Best Comments. Is it true, has she tried this before?
View attachment 520124
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?