I really, really want her to go into politics!Oh do fuck off woko!
Blind Item #6
The alliterate one has spent the past two weeks offering to host fundraisers for politicians in exchange for their public support for her ap...www.crazydaysandnights.net
She'd fit right in as a lying twat!I really, really want her to go into politics!
Hopefully he's doing an exposé on the HarklesHas anyone seen this?
Explosive Images! Ronan Farrow Caught With Convicted Criminal Who Targeted Meghan Markle & Prince Harry
See the crazy shots!radaronline.com
Also single fatherhood. Men are discriminated in that part.Family court & social services is political, though...she can’t talk about those things.
Even though she’s not one, she could champion single parents...usually mothers. Society still doesn’t properly recognise what a tremendously difficult thing it is to bring up children alone & there’s still a sneering attitude to them. Like they all dropped their knickers for a council flat, or something. No, most single mums wanted the nuclear family but got dumped.
Sorry...forgot to quote...that was for @peradetlic
As for Kate, well it is quite a restricted role in certain ways and she seems to understand that. But you can have a voice and make a difference and I think she's gradually doing that. Children's mental health was quite an undiscussed area a decade ago. I also think she'd be a sporty stay at home mother who did local volunteer work if William was a posh boy banker or whatever.
Even Philip thought it was restricting and in that doc a few years ago all his family were exclaiming "and he gave up his Naval career for her and he could have been an admiral (real one)!" and it was a big deal, so it's not just the women.
Although exactly zero people care what Tim gets up to for the most part unless he cocks it up and then every cares.
We were told that when they bring her down it would be amid an avalanche of Royal Stories to stop her getting a word in. I hope this is it!Kate: Making of a Queen on Itv3 right now for the Brits here. All the main channels seem to be flooded with royal programming in the next couple of weeks, none of them on the Harkles - lol!
No campaign involved. She tries to get K. Harris style the seat of a woman who is going to 'pop her clogs', as @freda19 puts it, soon. Or at least who will step back before the term is over.Do we truly think the political rumours are true? Is she actually so self obsessed and reality challenged that she doesn’t realise any political campaign of hers would be the biggest flop in the history of flops?!! I can’t actually fathom that someone, even Smirkle, could be that blind!
Ronan Farrow had lunch with the guy. Being a journalist, I suspect he's had lunch with a lot of people. Radar Online is going to have to come up with something a lot more salacious than this if they want me to think something is wrong with Farrow's reporting.Has anyone seen this?
Explosive Images! Ronan Farrow Caught With Convicted Criminal Who Targeted Meghan Markle & Prince Harry
See the crazy shots!radaronline.com
I rest my case.Yah, some people need to educate themselves. Truly shocking witnessing the denial that many many nations and races other than blacks were subjected to slavery and other horrors. I'm Irish, we got a bum deal from the English for centuries. I'm over it and I think Brenda is fabulous, so shoot me.
No Uk paper or mag could print medical details without the subject’s consent, whether they know and have proof or not. It is a rule on their code of ethics and editors have been fired over that.I guess she could just be a woman who was suddenly inundated with people asking about her son and it freaked her out so she set everything to private.
I don't really have an opinion on what's going on but it would be insane if they really were using a fake Archie to fool people. More insane than anything else almost.
I don't think the mainstream media will touch it until they're beyond sure. This is weirder than The Sun publicly questioning if James Hewitt was Harry's father. Either they're saying the Harkles are using a stand in for Archie when they don't even need to show him at all or they're going much deeper down the rabbit hole to surrogacy, moon bumps, no kid at all etc and Camilla T better have signed proof from God before The Telegraph or even The Star lets her print that.
I do too because I want to see her fail and I want to see how she would stand up to real scrutinyI really, really want her to go into politics!
Some peeps on this site or others (can't remember) are suggesting the doula is in fact the surrogate so MM could get away with a home birth.That should be interesting. A C-section surgical operation, with a home birth and a Doula ululating in the shadows waving bunches of smoking herbs.
In attendance: Chimpo the Gynae Obs. . I look forward to reading the headlines next day.
Some peeps on this site or others (can't remember) are suggesting the doula is in fact the surrogate so MM could get away with a home birth.
I very much doubt that the surrogacy is ever going to be exposed for this reason and no medical professional will ever dish the dirt due to ethics and fear of losing their job.No Uk paper or mag could print medical details without the subject’s consent, whether they know and have proof or not. It is a rule on their code of ethics and editors have been fired over that.
The detailed notice, date & time of birth with attending physicians, on the Palace gates is in effect the formal declaration that the child is of mother born AND is accepted into the line of succession. That bland anodyne note did not provide the confirmation that the child is known to be of mother born into the royal line... the constitutional rules... he has essentially effed his own kids out if anything. ..
Hazzno's family falls outside the constitutional rules that exist to protect the Monarchy because if these children exist they were not born of MM.
I don't think the RF will have any problem at all dealing with Hazzmo's farcical attempts to trick them into titles and child maintenance. They know everything that went on, fortunately.
Personally, the "live-in doula" line was what eventually sold me on the H&M using a surrogate theory after being on the fence about it a long time before that. Using a surrogate and using a moonbump to stage a pregnancy just seemed like such a ridiculous thing to lie about, and so devastating to any scrap of credibility if found out - I couldn't believe anyone would be stupid or arrogant enough to think they could really pull it off in the public eye, let alone with an (albeit tertiary) royal baby. But especially with this second one, it just fits so perfectly. COVID gives the perfect cover for staying indoors and out of sight so no-one realizes that the one with the growing bump isn't Meghan.Some peeps on this site or others (can't remember) are suggesting the doula is in fact the surrogate so MM could get away with a home birth.
Perhaps the papers can print something along the surrogate lines and see if the Harkles sue? If they don't, that's as good as a confirmation.I very much doubt that the surrogacy is ever going to be exposed for this reason and no medical professional will ever dish the dirt due to ethics and fear of losing their job.
The only way it will happen is if the surrogate comes forward but they will have signed a NDA. Their little scam is therefore unlikely to be exposed. This is how Smeggy has also got away with the fake miscarriage.
It appears to be an open secret though now. I've seen it mentioned widely on social media and in the comments section in the Daily Mail. The Harkles haven't sued anyone or these rumours or issued any denial statement
I didn't know Tanya Kim dated Corey before Meghan. Either M is a stalker or Jessica is a very lazy stylist.Don 't know about narc abuser, but stalker certainly. Cory Vittelo gf before MM (
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?