I'm still not convinced on the whole Gav/Archie thing - yet
My thoughts on the Archiedoll situation is that he definitely exists and was born using a gestational carrier. I don't believe the stories that the surrogate wouldn't hand him over. There would have been a contract in place, an NDA and loads of money changing hands.Question. If this is all true and Brynn let's H&M use her son Gavin to be an actor called Archie - surely as Gavin gets a bit older he'll start to understand what's happening, and he'll talk. Whether to his friends or adult relatives, or even start to ask Brynn just exactly what's going on. Better still will be one day while being televised live he could easily turn to Meghan and say, "you're not my mum, she's over there".
It's a big theatrical mess.
He is a child actor in making, thanks to Meghan. Hollywood is famous for child (exploitation, grooming) actors. Judy Garland, Lindsey Lohan, Aaron Carter, Macaulay Culkin,etc. God knows, we will get his Netflix documentary after 50 years.Question. If this is all true and Brynn let's H&M use her son Gavin to be an actor called Archie - surely as Gavin gets a bit older he'll start to understand what's happening, and he'll talk. Whether to his friends or adult relatives, or even start to ask Brynn just exactly what's going on. Better still will be one day while being televised live he could easily turn to Meghan and say, "you're not my mum, she's over there".
It's a big theatrical mess.
I think this is all rooted in one thing; the marriage of actress Grace Kelly to Rainier of Monaco, which is a 'tiny principality' (like, a square mile), filled with fuck all but casinos, foreign tax exiles and yachts, and her story is seen as a real life fulfilment of all the Disney versions of Hans Christian Anderson's tales about commoners or hidden royalty marrying princes.
I'm not sure people who lap this Hallmark shit up even understand the difference between constitutional and absolute monarchies. But this fantasy being fixed on modern European absolute monarchs is weird, because there's not even a single absolute monarchy left in Europe unless you count Vatican City, and you can't marry the Pope. Other than that, there are only a handful left in the entire world, most of them being Muslim states where the King (or Emir, or Sultan) can have multiple wives - Saudi Arabia, Brunei, Oman and I think UAE counts, then there's Swaziland in southern Africa, where the king also has multiple wives, I think at last count 15, and which is basically famous for being poor and being devastated by AIDS. Not sure any of this fits the Hallmark fantasy! I mean, another beautiful US movie star - Rita Hayworth - married an esteemed and filthy rich Muslim son of a spiritual leader and a Prince - the Aga Khan's son Prince Aly Khan - but that one doesn't seem to have captured the imagination the same way. Partly because it was really unhappy and they divorced quickly, but eh.
Which is again weird because all Europe's remaining monarchies exist in functioning democracies and most of them already marry non-royals these days, and people who have had *gasp* jobs!
The eyes are really similar - it could be the same kid, wouldn’t surprise me at all.
What do you make of this? I think it's the same child
I think Gavin is the boy on the beach the giggling boyApparently the kid on the right is 7 months older, but we have only ever seen a doll/PR pieces, we've never seen the real child in real time. So it could be Gavin that's used in place of Archie. I have no idea.
Lovely photoHow cute is this?
View attachment 511713
And even better, they’re in the Frogmore grounds on their mother son Easter walk. That’s completely what I want the royals to do: a close family charm offensive while throwing their fabulous brand of subtle shade! It’ll drive the Hazbeens insane!
Walking in those beautiful grounds <swoon> , imagine having that as your back garden.I think Gavin is the boy on the beach the giggling boy
Also on the Christmas card as the boy was too big to be Archie doll
They all in the scam together
Wonder who will play Princess Consuela Banana- Hammock.
Lovely photo
Now please don’t throw rotten fruit at me but....There is a likeness of Harry in Charles in that photo
As did Hazza?Archie will have to get DNA test to prove he is from royal family
There used to be a really funny poster on Skippy's blog who'd post "Bitch stole my look" pictures of Meghan's outfits (comparing them to funny things like duvet covers) as well as "Guess what's in my handbag/suitcase" posts ... they were really funny and then stopped posting; quite some time later they said they were warned off by someone for posting them.Agreed. Her style is truly hideous. Her royal outfits were arguably worse yet they all cost $$$$.
View attachment 509468
View attachment 509469
View attachment 509470
They markled quibi!Even before Archie’s birth, Meghan was plotting to explore media platforms through which she might cash in on her new status.
“The Telegraph has learned the Duke and Duchess of Sussex had discussions with the now defunct Quibi service from early 2019.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were discussing projects with a billion-dollar backed US streaming service a year before they stepped down as senior members of the Royal family, it has emerged.
The Sussexes had a series of meetings with Quibi, a now-defunct rival to YouTube, from early 2019 until after they dropped their 'Megxit' bombshell in January last year.
The Duke returned from the so-called Sandringham Summit to meet executives from the short video platform in London as plans for him to provide content apparently reached advanced stages.
In their interview with Oprah Winfrey, the couple said that they “didn’t have a plan” upon leaving the Royal family, but The Telegraph has learnt that they had talks with executives of the £1.3 billion start-up before their son Archie was born in May 2019.
The discussions are understood to have led to tensions with Palace staff fearful they would be accused of “cashing in” on their status, and because the couple were predominantly consulting Meghan’s US-based team of advisers.
A source with knowledge of the situation said: “There were well-developed proposals in place with Quibi from early 2019.” “
Anyone out there still believe they never had a plan!!
Harry and Meghan were in talks with video platform a year before ‘Megxit’
The Telegraph has learned the Duke and Duchess of Sussex had discussions with the now defunct Quibi service from early 2019www.telegraph.co.uk
Check out the ears...I’ve never connected the hallmark American girl European prince genre to Princess Grace before but it’s perfect - matches exactly and explains so much about the misconceptions of the British royals.
The eyes are really similar - it could be the same kid, wouldn’t surprise me at all.
They'd have to go some to find a body double with a pair of legs like smugs... those bad boys are truly an entity of their own.do the parents charge the harkles for using their kid Gavin? It makes no sense though.. The kid definitely looks like "archie"... why would the parents agree to feature him in the video? Speaking of conspiracy theory, how would we actually know if that was Smeggy in the video? All we saw was a woman and a child who went under a man/woman's legsI don't trust the Harkles at all..It could be a body double for all we know. very common in hollywood actors with their stunt doubles. #whereisArchie
I think taking care of two dogs at once would be way too much for Hazno to handle.Sorry, I don’t have time to read the whole thread/s but these photos of beach boy Harry...anyone else find it odd that he’s only there with the black lab? Who has two dogs and only takes one of them to play on the beach?
Very odd, imo.
Happy Easter x
I was wondering about the podcast! They only did the one episode -three months ago!"Tourre Bakahai on Twitter: "Notice how the Markles are always "having talks" about the multi-millions they require to show off their amazing talent, yet never actually produce anything. What's happened to their Spotify podcasts, for example? Are they conning their simpleton fans? https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?