I'm not sure she should have said anything about it even if she does have a solid source - which I'm not 100% convinced she does. She has contacts but I doubt she's as best buds as she'd like everyone to think.Personally I don't think that Lady C should have outed Anne at all. In my view that was a big misjudgment.
I'm sure every single member of the family had reservations about Snarkle. Naming anyone will inevitably cause a backlash in the media.
Anne is a strong lady and would probably take one for the team to take the heat off Charles but it seems really unfair.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Soho House is masquerading as a high class brothel!
I think this is what's called "riding two horses!" I hope he never gets to be James Bond now!The royals cant do right it seems:
Backstabbers :Idris Elba defends Harry and Meghan's Oprah interview: 'You cannot take someone's voice away'
The actor attended Harry and Meghan's wedding, and even DJ'd at the reception.uk.news.yahoo.com
Idris Elba Celebrates the Key Role Prince Charles Played in His Early Acting Career
Prince Charles played a surprising role in launching the careers of Idris Elba, David Oyelowo, Naughty Boy and morepeople.com
Another of the wokerati I fearDid he have any comments on all the lies the voice tells?
The Mail are running the story... ETA 'Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the claims made in a podcast 'I'm not sure she should have said anything about it even if she does have a solid source - which I'm not 100% convinced she does. She has contacts but I doubt she's as best buds as she'd like everyone to think.
However Gayle King certainly also has an agenda to make everything seem as dramatic as possible and that this interview is single handedly going to topple the monarchy and the Commonwealth.
Agree. I also think she's pretty bulletproof amongst the public - no drama, Olympian, kids seem switched on decent sorts, kidnapped and told kidnapper off. Hard not to like her.Anne can take it. She’s not going to be Queen, her patrons love her, she’s the hardest working royal who isn’t the Queen and I think she’s bulletproof because she doesn’t care what people on Twitter think.
Maybe she was asked if she'd take the hit . Take the heat away from the other senior royals. She really has an outstanding track record of dedication, and frankly told H what he didn't want to hear. She's a tough cookie for sure, and I think she'll come off the better for it in the long runPersonally I don't think that Lady C should have outed Anne at all. In my view that was a big misjudgment.
I'm sure every single member of the family had reservations about Snarkle. Naming anyone will inevitably cause a backlash in the media.
Anne is a strong lady and would probably take one for the team to take the heat off Charles but it seems really unfair.
The alternatives are SO much worse, look around the world. RF is not perfect but the stability and consistency it offers us all in this MAD world is better than anything else in my view. There are checks and balances in place, but HMTQ hasn't put a foot wrong and people admire what she has done in her ceaseless years of service. Its extraordinary . I think William will be a chip of the old block and all this BS will make him and the inner circle stronger.Amal Clooney has been on the board of the Prince's Trust since 2019, which I was surprised to learn recently.
Who're you going to stand with when the chips are down Armegeddon Markle or the future King of the United Kingdom?
99.9 percent of Tattlers would trample over the tramp to get to Charles. I've always liked the Monarchy and have enjoyed watching each generation grow up paralleling my life to theirs (they definitely had the best end of things) but it's surprised me recently just how much.
This is clear as mud to me. If they were already married in Botswana as rumoured where does that leave the 19th May wedding? Don't you have to declare before you get married that you are a spinster or divorcee or whatever? Nothing these two do is ever straightforward and above board, and they take an immature and puerile delight in trying to get one over on everyone with their games and lies. Even on serious issues such as getting married and giving birth. No wonder nobody believes a word they say.Erm. Welby has made it clear he didn't marry them earlier, I think, as those were 'private and pastoral meetings'. The big one is whether they had married elsewherelike Botswana. Yes I've got a 'Go on, I dare ya!' vibe about his comments about the legal wedding as well.
It's taken too long for this to be said, and it's being said too elaborately, when a two sentence factual comment from Lambeth Palace should have emerged within 24 hours if this was straightforward.
It is all a bit worrying I have to concede, it sort of plays into the hand of an establishment behind the establishment.I never post on Twitter, I'm like a silent assassin, pop in grab the tea and post it here for all to enjoy🫖
You are spot on, look at all the dreadful human rights issues going on around the world, it's all so Medieval its tradgicI kind of said this the other day but the last few days I’ve gone down a bit of a rabbit hole looking into North Korea.
Not going to get all heavy about it but it gave me even more perspective than I already had on woke stuff and MM by extension. I’ve always thought the woke shit is just that, a load of shit. But the true hardships, oppression, lack of basic human rights and poverty these people face is unbelievable.
And yet you have Miss Arrogant Nobody Markle complaining that she wasn’t number 1, that someone made a comment about her baby (a lie anyway), that she was bullied by the press, that she wasn’t accepted into the family, or by the public. That she didn’t have a voice.
This woman is one of the most privileged, wealthy, fortunate people on the planet. Not only are her claims about the RF and press racism total bullshit, they’re also sickeningly trivial even if true. Oh so an older member of the RF was curious how a biracial baby might look. How evil of them. So a journalist complimented you on your ‘rich heritage and blood’ and good looks. How evil of her.
Meghan is a disgusting narcissist and these jumped up, pathetic, woke warriors siding with her need to get a fucking grip.
I just posted on this and used the same phrase Clear as Mud. Great minds ..!!.Well, for me it clears up Bugger all.
1) its 2 weeks too late
2) its clear as mud
Probably he's now seen as such a pain in the a..se that he's not a great loss. Who wants an apologist like him droning on about our racist past when he can't seem to tell the difference between Clive of India and the Commonwealth countries? A woke joke, drug addict and married to a lunatic? Fantastic role model, not.On a serious note, shes taken him away from many British and Commonwealth Charities. People dont seem to be mentioning this , in the media?
There was once a rumour that Invictus game photos where Smeg is directing the cameras is where she told Harry that they had videos of him doing stuff that if it came out would ruin him/family. They think the videos maybe came from Soho house. Which would tie in if it was brothel.... it wasn’t really a first day.. Harry arranged a “date” it was Meghan, she filmed & they tried to blackmail him at the games. Hence why he looked so worried in some of the pictures. Again, totally a rumour but might hold some water depending how foily your hat is.I've said it before and I'll say it again, Soho House is masquerading as a high class brothel!
It's members, such as the gruesome twosome who met there on their dates, are "associating" in rooms which are decorated in wallpaper which have genatalia and pornographic images woven into the leaves of the pattern - no doubt considered "art" or artistic" by the members.
This Markus Anderson chap who appears to be very influential both in Soho House and their relationship, to my mind, seems no better than a pimp! The basis of the gruesome twosome's relationship is indicative of how it is progressing - one of whoring, blackmail and debauchery. If this is the case, it cannot end well for any of them in the long term.
History has shown that characters and organisations like these inevitably fall.
Good.
Very true, and your last sentence! The blackmail is continuing with them trying to subjugate the RF. The debauchery of their secret sniggering to each other about pornographic words uttered by their "son". Their sleazy acquaintances, and the pair of them pimping themselves out and selling our RF to anyone to earn a few bucks. All based on lies.I've said it before and I'll say it again, Soho House is masquerading as a high class brothel!
It's members, such as the gruesome twosome who met there on their dates, are "associating" in rooms which are decorated in wallpaper which have genatalia and pornographic images woven into the leaves of the pattern - no doubt considered "art" or artistic" by the members.
This Markus Anderson chap who appears to be very influential both in Soho House and their relationship, to my mind, seems no better than a pimp! The basis of the gruesome twosome's relationship is indicative of how it is progressing - one of whoring, blackmail and debauchery. If this is the case, it cannot end well for any of them in the long term.
History has shown that characters and organisations like these inevitably fall.
Good.
The thing is Anne is low key very popular right now but in the 90s and early 2000s she had a lot of unpopularity because she was seen as snootier than her mother, ugly (she's definitely not!) and her dogs attacked at least two other dogs. I don't think she cares about social media or Sugars but I'm not sure she's bullet proof. It's possible she actually said this but it's also possible Lady C is just passing on gossip that doesn't have a great source and it's not very fair. It's also possible she's taking one for the team.The Mail are running the story... ETA 'Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the claims made in a podcast '
(It's a straight account of Lady C's comments on her podcast - no additional reporting)
Lady Colin Campbell claims Princess Anne is royal accused of racism
Socialite Lady Colin Campbell has claimed the Queen's daughter Princess Anne is the royal Meghan and Harry accused of racism in their bombshell interview with Oprahwww.dailymail.co.uk
She added that Anne was concerned that Meghan may not 'actually have respect for the institution in to which she was marrying, and the family in which she was marrying'.
'Meghan and Harry have used that genuine concern of a loving aunt, knowing that because she is down to earth, experienced, modest, intelligent and sensible, and that you cannot make a sow's ear into a silk purse.
'Nobody is the guilty party in terms of racism. But Princess Anne was the champion in terms of 'don't marry that girl, she is unsuitable. She is wrong for the country, wrong for the job. Well, it's turned out to be true.
Unless Lady C was given the ok to say what she did?Personally I don't think that Lady C should have outed Anne at all. In my view that was a big misjudgment.
I'm sure every single member of the family had reservations about Snarkle. Naming anyone will inevitably cause a backlash in the media.
Anne is a strong lady and would probably take one for the team to take the heat off Charles but it seems really unfair.
Princess Anne is as hard as nails. I wouldn't be surprised if she said something that was blunt and tactless and I also wouldn't be surprised if she fell on her sword. Either way she doesn't give a toss about what anyone says or thinks about her. She's practicing her 'naff offs' as we speak. She saw off Donald Trump. A bunch of psychotic sugars won't worry her.The thing is Anne is low key very popular right now but in the 90s and early 2000s she had a lot of unpopularity because she was seen as snootier than her mother, ugly (she's definitely not!) and her dogs attacked at least two other dogs. I don't think she cares about social media or Sugars but I'm not sure she's bullet proof. It's possible she actually said this but it's also possible Lady C is just passing on gossip that doesn't have a great source and it's not very fair. It's also possible she's taking one for the team.
I just don't want her to have to retire in "disgrace" and be lumped in with her younger brother if the media savages her over it.
That's my instinct as well. It diffuses the whole comment as people know Princess Anne and exactly what she is likely to have said re her dim nephew's plans to marry a grifting divorcee actress.Unless Lady C was given the ok to say what she did?
That’s interesting. They can attack Andrew, which doesn’t bother me, but don’t go for Anne.That's my instinct as well. It diffuses the whole comment as people know Princess Anne and exactly what she is likely to have said re her dim nephew's plans to marry a grifting divorcee actress.
Mail still moderating comments and also the Sussex Nuts aren't touching this topic on Twitter.
They won’t do, because nothing racist was said. They’re not interested in the truth, just like Smeg and Scabies.That's my instinct as well. It diffuses the whole comment as people know Princess Anne and exactly what she is likely to have said re her dim nephew's plans to marry a grifting divorcee actress.
Mail still moderating comments and also the Sussex Nuts aren't touching this topic on Twitter.
Well Andrew is just stupid. Even if he did nothing untoward, he was stupid enough to continue associating with Epstein and even worse, in public.That’s interesting. They can attack Andrew, which doesn’t bother me, but don’t go for Anne.
Oh, the attempted kidnapping! I doubt the Sugars or a lot of younger people even know about that.Agree. I also think she's pretty bulletproof amongst the public - no drama, Olympian, kids seem switched on decent sorts, kidnapped and told kidnapper off. Hard not to like her.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?