Their Netflix content hasn't materialised yet, is that ever going to happen?
Harry and Meghan #82 Duke of Hazzard & Lil MerMeg, no titles no cash, you'll just have to beg
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yep Freda's balloonIs that Freda’s balloon ?! Lol, thanks Pom you made my day
xx.You're welcome
that's lovely to hear xx.You're welcome
xx.Here is your award
xx.
Back later
The Aspen institute job' is only for 6 months , this along with the chimp gig he may well be signing on the dole in late summer.
Maybe JCMH will be reddit Shimpo?The good news just keeps on coming. Serena is clearly deludedView attachment 498974
Thank you @ResidentMerkin for the new thread! I’m unsure whose title was picked but well done to you
Sorry if this has been posted..... this guy has her down to a tee!!!!
Sky news Australia is the only coverage I can watch on it. No wokeness in sight
I do not see how the Harkles are appealing to any serious company. Anyone who has looked at their behaviour for the last couple of years will note the following:
-They are conniving and will lie for their gain. (That IMO started when they made the British taxpayer and the Royal family for their huge wedding etc. on the assumption that they would become full-time working-royals when in reality they were already plotting Megxit)
-They are professional victims (The Oprah-interview: Nothing is their fault)
-They employ one of the most ruthless PR-companies in the world (Sunshine Sachs) and deflect all criticism of their actions by attacking the people criticising them
-They are incapable of maintaining long-term relationships (How many family-members and old friends do these two have combined, that they are still speaking to?)
-They start everything and finish nothing (One Archwell-podcast and no output for Netflix, even though they deals have been in place for a long time)
-They do some shady dealings with money (Travalyst, the missing Disney-money, Sussex-Royal)
-They are the biggest hypocrites I know (kindness, environment etc.)
-Their entitlement is breathtaking (Megxit-terms)
-They will publically trash you and lie about you, if they do not get their way
-They blackmailed Harry's family and Thomas Markle
-They show no empathy for sick family-members (Prince Philip and Thomas Markle)
-They constantly try to overshadow people they work with
-They have a high turnover of staff
-They are untalented, but have a huge opinion of their talent
-They do not keep to any agreements (Megxit-terms)
-Both of them consider a supporting-role beneath their dignity (Harry said being the spare was being "subservient"
-They use the charities they are associated with for publicity
-They have no trouble harming their charities, when it is in their interest (Invictus-fundraiser being cancelled due to their deal with Netflix)
-They are not grateful towards their families, even though they have benefitted tremendously from them in the past
In short: They are greedy, entitled, hypocritical, not reliable, back-stabbing bullies, who seem to see their relationships and charities as a means of enriching them.
I can see, that some start-ups see them (or rather Prince Harry) as a good way to gain recognition, but in my opinion their character-flaws make them extremely unappealing spokespeople. Already a lot of people are saying, that a person who could get his suicidal wife help, because he was ashamed of the stigma, should not be associated with anything to do with mental health.
If the charity-commision finds, that they embezzled charity-money, even Sunshine Sachs will not be able to save their public image.
-They are conniving and will lie for their gain. (That IMO started when they made the British taxpayer and the Royal family for their huge wedding etc. on the assumption that they would become full-time working-royals when in reality they were already plotting Megxit)
-They are professional victims (The Oprah-interview: Nothing is their fault)
-They employ one of the most ruthless PR-companies in the world (Sunshine Sachs) and deflect all criticism of their actions by attacking the people criticising them
-They are incapable of maintaining long-term relationships (How many family-members and old friends do these two have combined, that they are still speaking to?)
-They start everything and finish nothing (One Archwell-podcast and no output for Netflix, even though they deals have been in place for a long time)
-They do some shady dealings with money (Travalyst, the missing Disney-money, Sussex-Royal)
-They are the biggest hypocrites I know (kindness, environment etc.)
-Their entitlement is breathtaking (Megxit-terms)
-They will publically trash you and lie about you, if they do not get their way
-They blackmailed Harry's family and Thomas Markle
-They show no empathy for sick family-members (Prince Philip and Thomas Markle)
-They constantly try to overshadow people they work with
-They have a high turnover of staff
-They are untalented, but have a huge opinion of their talent
-They do not keep to any agreements (Megxit-terms)
-Both of them consider a supporting-role beneath their dignity (Harry said being the spare was being "subservient"
-They use the charities they are associated with for publicity
-They have no trouble harming their charities, when it is in their interest (Invictus-fundraiser being cancelled due to their deal with Netflix)
-They are not grateful towards their families, even though they have benefitted tremendously from them in the past
In short: They are greedy, entitled, hypocritical, not reliable, back-stabbing bullies, who seem to see their relationships and charities as a means of enriching them.
I can see, that some start-ups see them (or rather Prince Harry) as a good way to gain recognition, but in my opinion their character-flaws make them extremely unappealing spokespeople. Already a lot of people are saying, that a person who could get his suicidal wife help, because he was ashamed of the stigma, should not be associated with anything to do with mental health.
If the charity-commision finds, that they embezzled charity-money, even Sunshine Sachs will not be able to save their public image.
Aspen Institute Launches Commission on Information Disorder to Develop Actionable Public-Private Responses to the Disinformation Crisis
$3.25M in support from Craig Newmark Philanthropies fuels this effort to quell the information emergency as well as other cybersecurity and tech policy initiatives
Over the coming weeks, Krebs will identify and recruit a co-chair and the members of the commission, which will include researchers, tech leaders, media specialists, private sector practitioners, and policy makers.
Congrats residentmerkin on your vip status! I remember how excited I was to get mine lol !
Latest Paula M
Latest Paula M
Kudos to Zara for being a brave mama. I cannot Imagine Me-Me and her mini-Me to be in that situation. I haven't still bought her half cooked miscarriage story.
I like lozza who unlike hazza has Balls.
God I love Popbitch
Cant help wondering how they have got away / are getting away,with so much for so long. Could there be (please not ) something they can reveal which is actually true...they seem to skim over people's feelings so easily without a care, someone somewhere must be able to put them straight in no uncertain terms...it needs to happen soon before their illusions of grandeur pop.
I'm not convinced about this operation. They make it sound like something we all need but I don't trust organisations trying to impose censorship:Where does the academically challenged Prince fit into this commissions recruitment?Aspen Institute Launches Commission on Information Disorder to Develop Actionable Public-Private Responses to the Disinformation Crisis
$3.25M in support from Craig Newmark Philanthropies fuels this effort to quell the information emergency as well as other cybersecurity and tech policy initiativeswww.aspeninstitute.org
Over the coming weeks, Krebs will identify and recruit a co-chair and the members of the commission, which will include researchers, tech leaders, media specialists, private sector practitioners, and policy makers.
Kamala needs to be careful going one on one with Bill. Just ask Monica! You’re right it should be Hillary over Bill but Kamala will use the chance to show Bill as a misogynistic berk who sees women as objects to fulfil his *ahem* urges. Kamala is just like Meghan. Knows her target audience and how to get the most out of what her intentions are.
Was MerMeg friends with Serena before she met Harry?
Re scobie's tweet, imagine if someone had tweeted 'Oprah, another angry black woman....'
- Status