Thinking about this practically, the idea of a charitable foundation/church (like Mama Kardashian) is such a well-exposed money making ruse for celebs, and so very very 90s, I'm surprised that they weren't advised to something a bit for 21st century like set up an ESG fund with clear identiable investment criteria along sustainable themes and seasoned money/investment managers/venture capitalists that they could have hired and used their initial capital to start the fund (others to proudly join). that would have actually been clever, probably made them real money, no real need to bank on their titles in the long term: just the launch to attract genuine talent and invvestment opportunities. ESG investing is VERY 2021. They could have even partnered up wtih JPMorgan -- all the big banks are doing it, just none involving celebs. Celebs are themselves actually directly investing into start ups and early staage growth companies -- basically putting theirr money to work for the long-term so they aren't acting well into their 80s like Michael Douglas
. Aston Kutcher, Ryan Reynolds, Jen Aniston, George Clooney. sometimes they advertise their investment but more often they don't. These two are really just so pathetic and really all they want is the air time.
