Well that was interesting. Wow. There's nowt as queer as folk.
That clip of the white girl yelling at black police officers who were just doing their job
unbelievable 
She only goes for white guysWhy is this likely his next moveWhats the betting M tries to leave H for Kanye seeing as he’s divorced now.
I saw a video today of Rihanna and H getting HIV tests in Barbados, 4 years ago. One of the comments said ‘Prince Harry isn’t the best looking but there’s something sexy about him’.
The response was ‘witch no...he just a bleeping Prince’
Ah yes, Meghan and WorldVision. I donated to WorldVision for several years until I started learning more about child sponsorship models of charity and how heavily the Christian agenda is pushed, even in areas where that is not the primary religion. I get that for some Christians, this is something important to them, spreading the word, but it wasn’t something I really wanted to be part of and it isn’t a very “woke” model. I always saw her involvement with it as a scramble to have a humanitarian resume by the time she finally succeeded in meeting Harry. Clearly she didn’t have time to do her research on it and was just taking whatever partnerships she could get. Would LOVE to know what her woke followers think of WorldVision’s anti-gay stance/religious conversion agenda!I think I have some idea of what BIB means but can someone clarify it for me
For example the statements in the below picture, with ticks beside them as if that makes it gospel truth:
Independently making her way in the world/earned her way in the entertainment world- are you sure about that?!
UN women’s advocate- but what does that mean, what does it entail? Isn’t it just an arbitrary title? Certainly does not include bullying female staff and dropping female friends at the click of a finger
World vision. Well the pic attached below speaks for itself
What social justice issues, I only saw her wearing designer clothes and pushing Harry out of the way to talk to people
Bullied? Try ‘criticised for her vulgar behaviour’View attachment 489794View attachment 489791
Bit in bold. Sorry!I think I have some idea of what BIB means but can someone clarify it for me
For example the statements in the below picture, with ticks beside them as if that makes it gospel truth:
Independently making her way in the world/earned her way in the entertainment world- are you sure about that?!
UN women’s advocate- but what does that mean, what does it entail? Isn’t it just an arbitrary title? Certainly does not include bullying female staff and dropping female friends at the click of a finger
World vision. Well the pic attached below speaks for itself
What social justice issues, I only saw her wearing designer clothes and pushing Harry out of the way to talk to people
Bullied? Try ‘criticised for her vulgar behaviour’View attachment 489794View attachment 489791
I didn’t know this. M is a hypocritical liar with no real morals or integrity, this just cements that.
Agree 100%. The RF knew it was a fake from the outset but H&M thought they'd pulled it off. I think asking for a title for Farchy (and inmate Dorito) along with all the other shennanigans was the last straw and they were told to leave. MM cannot cope with her deceit being exposed, the humiliation of Catherine knowing! and to me nothing else explains the rage and bitterness. The RF know everything!WOW, haven't finished reading this but yeah. Sorry cant screen grab (use the link below) it's all here pretty much calling out the no Merchie.
" For me the alpha and the omega is “Archie”. It is impossible to discuss the interview before talking about him first. I don’t believe that there is a child called Archie living with them in LA. I think that Meghan faked her pregnancy and that she never gave birth to a son. And I also believe that this is the real reason, why they had to leave as working royals – it was not their free decision. I admit that it is a theory and that the ultimate proof is still missing, but for me it is only logical explanation for all the inconsistencies..."
The thing is, the baby that we have seen on a few occasions looks a lot like H, and a fair bit like M too. I 100% believe a surrogate carried him, the moonbump, the irregularities around his birth etc. But I just don’t buy that he’s a doll.
)
Whoever they are, they must be reading TattleOh, this is delicious!
Meghan & I | The Spectator Australia
Meghan Markle is a vicious, conniving, hypocritical, manipulative, unlikable witch. In another life, we’d be the best of friends! But she’s just not royal material. And it has nothing to do with the…spectator.com.au
Yeah I'm with you on that. They're not too old to notice ! That's insulting
Tbf it's one thing posting stuff here, but that was a pretty hateful article. I didn't much like it. I mean I agreed with some of it. But it was pretty horrible.Whoever they are, they must be reading Tattle
"Wanna f...k a Victim?" doesn't have quite the same cachet as "Wanna f...k a Prince?"
Rumour has it...
Oh, it's Milo Yianopolopopodopolous. Queeny old bitchery is his talent! He's made a whole career out of it.Whoever they are, they must be reading Tattle
Yiannopoulos is vile.
Milo Yiannopoulous the now ‘ex-gay’. He’s so deliberately rude and controversial. He used to be very smart and on the money but he seems to have strayed now into just being a prick.
Ex gay? Last I heard he was married to some black dude. WTF is he on now? He's such a theatrical little bugger.
