This is all so tacky, who tf is Gayle King and why is she now involved! Also, the wording ‘claim they can prove everything’ just sums it up. Such a childish and manipulative lie. Why did they have to doctor headlines and articles then, why not show these supposedly damning, irrefutable ‘receipts’. They don’t exist, that’s why!
View attachment 485051
Is it irony (don't know if it's the correct term) that she's pulling the race card out while sat alongside her (alleged) racist husband.It's the race angle, the ignorance, and the cult of Diana being invoked.
Nah, Haz can have a toy soldier army doing yoga. Almost as much plastic as his wife!Fuck that - give them The Terracotta Army!
TBF, he looks as if he is concentrating while trying to exit a tricky junction....
But the British press arent racist!This is all so tacky, who tf is Gayle King and why is she now involved! Also, the wording ‘claim they can prove everything’ just sums it up. Such a childish and manipulative lie. Why did they have to doctor headlines and articles then, why not show these supposedly damning, irrefutable ‘receipts’. They don’t exist, that’s why!
View attachment 485051
I'd strip both the York and Sussex titles. Andrew doesn't have a son to inherit the Dukedom, so there's no issue there. The Princesses have their married surnames so don't need to use York. Sarah could be allowed to use Windsor as a surname. Downgrade Harry/Meghan to Earl/Countess of Dumbarton and style Archie as Viscount Whatever.IMHO the only reason the Queen hasn’t removed their royal titles is because of the elephant in the room called Andrew.
If she takes away their titles then there will be calls to strip Andrew of his and she doesn’t want to do that.
If the accusations toward Andrew had never happened, I believe their titles would have been long gone by now.
The sugars bleat on about Andrew but imho I think his “situation” (for want of a better word) is the only thing stopping Harry and Meghan from losing everything.
And the Mail headline is back to saying she’s not surprised about racism in the RFHarry and Meghan: Michelle Obama says Duchess of Sussex's racism claims 'weren't a complete surprise'
The former first lady described Meghan's accusations of racism in her Oprah Winfrey interview as "heartbreaking to hear".news.sky.com
Michelle Obama supporting Gobble Hag?
Exactly. Why would they have to use fake/doctored/taken out of context ones when they supposedly have these ‘real examples’ and evidence.But the British press arent racist!
Wasnt this proved by the fact that CBS and the Meghan and Harry, Oprah show had to get creative and make up nasty headlines!!!
I would imagine the producers would have used any racist headlines if any had existed!!!
That was so refreshing to watch!We need more people like this on our UK channels. Completely spot on. No more shouty racist Shola or Trisha Goddard please!
Genuinely hilarious. I clicked on this woman’s profile and thought to myself it 100% will say she/her in her bio and it does. These people are just sheep with no critical faculties.Just reported her tweets.. Just disgusting now using the women card
Where can you see the complaint figures?Meghans got nearly as many complaints as Piers
Thread suggestion:
Harry and Meghan #78 700 Complaints a day, the Queen needs to remove their Titles to keep the complaining peasants at bay
But he will get a title when Charles is king....surely they can wait a couple of years? Archie won't be old enough to understand anyway. Makes no sense.This is one of most insane parts about it. They’ve gone on TV and trashed the RF, accusing them of being a family of racist bullies.
But their goal (well one of them) seemingly is to get Archie a title?! Makes absolutely no sense, why would they want to be associated with the RF if they’re that dreadful. Why do they keep their own titles for that matter?
Oh that’s right, MONEY! They have no class or dignity. So disingenuous.
The 700 complaints was what a royal insider allegedWhere can you see the complaint figures?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?