Would their divorce be under UK law? Not sure of the legality behind it.Not in a UK divorce. They would share any capital accumulated since the marriage (after debts accumulated in the marriage are paid) and that's it. Plus some child support that is related to income.
She will try to negotiate more but as things stand, this is a short marriage and Megz' earning potential has been enhanced by the marriage.
Do they eat eye balls in Morocco? To be fair I would struggle to eat some foods offered as gifts abroad, I can just about manage cheese and pickle.
I would imagine Piers is very much in the know about what's going on and what any of the press have on her - he's not stupid so wouldn't be so adamant about her lying if he didn't have proof and he also knows a lot of people so would be very easy for him to find anything out. The net is closing in on her, she has pissed of the British press so they will do everything they can to expose her and she's also upset the Royal Family who have deeper pockets and better contacts than she'll ever have. She may have won the battle but she will definitely not win the war - the Royal Family are respected the world over and Meghan was a generally unknown actress before she married Harry. There's no one of any consequence sticking up for her - just a wannabee journalist and a few of her mates (is it just me or was the one on This Morning weird, she had an insane laugh and was trying hard to be threatening with all the talk of email and text proof and talking about new eras, etc. - she sounded like a cross between a laughing hyena and Tony Soprano!) The wokies will move on to something else soon particulary when Love Island starts up again and the lockdown is lifted.Anyone else think that Piers Morgan may be quietly up to something behind the scenes?
The only job he‘s lost is GMB - he’s still editor at large for MailOnline (I think) & he’s most certainly still a columnist for them and yet he’s written nothing at all about what’s happened this week. I find that peculiar.
Maybe he’s planning a publish or be damned article regarding the bullied aides. He’s already said that he’s heard some of the as yet unheard specifics and they’re shocking.
I do think something interesting might be about to happen
Clothes are bloody similar - a white shirt is a bliddy white shirt. Every woman hooks her sunglasses onto her blouse and puts her hands on her hips at some bliddy time. We all wear blues of differing shades, black trousers, cream jumpers. Just such juvenile journalism that means zilch. Smegma didn't get the big sapphire though - ha ha ha ha!It’s the whole problem of context again, a concept M fans don’t seem familiar with. Yes Kate has worn a few outfits similar to Diana’s, over the 10 years she has been Duchess of Cambridge.
MM, over 18 months of being in the RF i.e. in England, doing engagements, all that, has deliberately copied Diana numerous times. Creepily. She even copied Diana years before she even met Harry. I’ve probably posted this photo comparison about 15 times now but this to me is just absolute proof of what we’re all thinking. M is Diana’s obsessed fan, and Harry is being had. View attachment 483349
Are you being sarcastic? M went on some kind of aid mission to Africa (I read it was with World Vision) same as Diana, and did that pose wearing that outfit? I really don’t think that’s a coincidence at all!?Clothes are bloody similar - a white shirt is a bliddy white shirt. Every woman hooks her sunglasses onto her blouse and puts her hands on her hips at some bliddy time. We all wear blues of differing shades, black trousers, cream jumpers. Just such juvenile journalism that means zilch. Smegma didn't get the big sapphire though - ha ha ha ha!
Yep.Not in a UK divorce. They would share any capital accumulated since the marriage (after debts accumulated in the marriage are paid) and that's it. Plus some child support that is related to income.
She will try to negotiate more but as things stand, this is a short marriage and Megz' earning potential has been enhanced by the marriage.
Not really no - except where it is obvious. But it means nothing - Harry wasn't with his mother when she walked in a mine field. Smegma doesn't even have to the balls to walk in one - she just creates her own. I'm just saying the clothes comparison is relentless. Oh Kate copied Smegs by wearing brown boots or a black top - blurgh.Are you being sarcastic? M went on some kind of aid mission to Africa (I read it was with World Vision) same as Diana, and did that pose wearing that outfit? I really don’t think that’s a coincidence at all!?
Very true about the engagement ring though, bet M was livid they wouldn’t take it off Kate and give it to her!
And i am sure the RF would be using Fiona Shackleton as the solicitor/lawyer. Meghan would get nothing. (or a tiny margin)Yep.
When Sarah, Duchess of York divorced from Randy Andy in the 90s, she got £15K a year and free use of a Kensington Palace apartment, schools paid for etc for the two Princesses. But she did very poorly financially herself and had to 'go to work' which led to her doing stuff like those Cranberry Spray adverts. And the Oprah interview, haha.
Meghan was legally married in the UK, so UK divorce rules apply. I'm sure she'd spend so much on lawyers that she'd piss away a significant percentage of anything she got anyway.
I think there’s degrees of comparison tbh. Yes wearing a classic black dress, or brown boots, or a simple coat, is not copying. But there comes a time where it blatantly is copying, surely!Not really no - except where it is obvious. But it means nothing - Harry wasn't with his mother when she walked in a mine field. Smegma doesn't even have to the balls to walk in one - she just creates her own. I'm just saying the clothes comparison is relentless. Oh Kate copied Smegs by wearing brown boots or a black top - blurgh.
It would depend on who files first and where they file, not where they were married. International divorces are tricky things, and Megz and Harry could decide to file in California if they wanted to as that is where they are currently resident. Harry would have to file first in the UK to keep the California courts out of it. (Not a lawyer but this is generally how it goes...).Yep.
When Sarah, Duchess of York divorced from Randy Andy in the 90s, she got £15K a year and free use of a Kensington Palace apartment, schools paid for etc for the two Princesses. But she did very poorly financially herself and had to 'go to work' which led to her doing stuff like those Cranberry Spray adverts. And the Oprah interview, haha.
Meghan was legally married in the UK, so UK divorce rules apply. I'm sure she'd spend so much on lawyers that she'd piss away a significant percentage of anything she got anyway.
But whilst living in the UK they did not own anything - no property, no cars, borrowed jewellry. The kids would get maintenace but her's wouldn't be clear-cut and certainly wouldn't involve living in a $16mil property when so little of it was actually paid for.Yep.
When Sarah, Duchess of York divorced from Randy Andy in the 90s, she got £15K a year and free use of a Kensington Palace apartment, schools paid for etc for the two Princesses. But she did very poorly financially herself and had to 'go to work' which led to her doing stuff like those Cranberry Spray adverts. And the Oprah interview, haha.
Meghan was legally married in the UK, so UK divorce rules apply. I'm sure she'd spend so much on lawyers that she'd piss away a significant percentage of anything she got anyway.
Do you have a link please, as I've completely failed to find it.***********************************WIKI UPDATE**************************************
Just a quickie, I've updated the wiki with pregnancy/moonbump information and pictures. This is only for the Archie pregnancy. I will update with new information as and when for the current pregnancy. A lot of information I have seen previously has disappeared off the net, including videos off the harry markle blog. Therefore I have used all the information I currently have available to update the wiki. Have fun!
That horrible blue/white outfit - wow - I get it!I think there’s degrees of comparison tbh. Yes wearing a classic black dress, or brown boots, or a simple coat, is not copying. But there comes a time where it blatantly is copying, surely!
M is a contrived narc with a Diana obsession, I find it hard to believe these were coincidences. They’re statement looks. The first green one she’s even found a coat with the black detailing, and it’s a maternity outfit. I don’t buy that it’s not intentional.View attachment 483369
Do you have a link please, as I've completely failed to find it.
wait what? do I need to [gingerly] look at some more random word-drops? what's this aabout salmon? porta potty? I thought she peed al-frescoOmg ew. I remember googling porta potty and wishing I hadn’t. I thought it was slang for just being an escort, but then I read about live salmon and camels
Oh it’s just awful, I’d advise you don’t google itwait what? do I need to [gingerly] look at some more random word-drops? what's this aabout salmon? porta potty? I thought she peed al-fresco
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?