You are correct, she has full legal custody of all minor grandchildren, the law in question is calledpart of me wonders if she’s deliberately obtuse about the details surrounding giving birth because she WANTS people to speculate on whether she used a surrogate or not. It creates drama which she thrives on and gives her attention.
Is it also feasible she wants to make sure Archie *isn’t* in the line of succession - if there is sufficient doubt around the details of his birth and they didn’t follow required protocol then could this be a basis for excluding him?
I could be wrong but I’m fairly certain heirs of the Queen of England “belong” to the monarch and if this as the case, the monarch could force Archie to be returned tothe U.K.and goodbye child support/ emotional blackmail tool against Harry
but maybe I’m too far down a rabbit hole...!
You know what... you could be right. That could be the ACE in the hole for the Queen.. if that happened... markel would not know what hit her...You are correct, she has full legal custody of all minor grandchildren, the law in question is called
‘The Grand Opinion for the Prerogative Concerning the Royal Family’, it was introduced by King George I in 1717.
Perhaps the old chap had dealings with a Markke ancestor back in the day!
Article here:
The reason why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry may not always have custody of royal baby
The law dates all the way back to the early 18th centurywww.independent.co.uk
Yes, most of those outfits arent even the sameEven The colours of dresses aren't matching.
You make such good and valid points. No wonder William enjoys time at his in-laws.It's lovely to see how close and supportive the Middleton siblings are. I've seen old footage of Pippa defending Catherine from paparazzi in the early dating days. Catherine took care of her brother James during a serious mental health spell, accompanying him to appointments while M was busy resenting her. Spot the difference between the two Wives of Windsor.
Welcome! and when she barged ahead in Morocco, she din't curtsey to the King of Morocco. Harry bowed. OMG.Followed for quite a few threads but first comment! I cannot believe how often she taps his back as if to say "HELLO! I'm here. Me first!" It reminds me of how abusers keep their victims 'in tow' in public by holding their arm/squeezing their hand or something to remind them if they step 'out of line' there will be consequences later. And all the barging about in front of him. The front on her! And those two women who curtsied to her and looked at him like he was nothing need a slap!
That is why she legged it with Archie pretending to just be taking a bit of time off in Canada.... but instead went and got all her stuff out of storage (planning on staying in the UK, eh megsy?) and ARchie has never set foot in the UK again -- and never will. Its not like TQ is going to send in James Bond to recover a great grandchild in another country. She's probably like "yeah - I got enough on my hands"You are correct, she has full legal custody of all minor grandchildren, the law in question is called
‘The Grand Opinion for the Prerogative Concerning the Royal Family’, it was introduced by King George I in 1717.
Perhaps the old chap had dealings with a Markke ancestor back in the day!
Article here:
The reason why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry may not always have custody of royal baby
The law dates all the way back to the early 18th centurywww.independent.co.uk
She also introduced herself to the King of Morocco before H did, and tried to strike up a conversation before H had even greeted him! She’s such an arrogant little cow. Imagine having the gall, I’d be shitting a brick in these situations trying really hard not to put a foot wrong.Welcome! and when she barged ahead in Morocco, she din't curtsey to the King of Morocco. Harry bowed. OMG.
I’d pay good money for a front row seat!You know what... you could be right. That could be the ACE in the hole for the Queen.. if that happened... markel would not know what hit her...
There will be no end of things happening behind the scenes now.
Oh no I’ve copied both of themEven The colours of dresses aren't matching.
I did not even notice that! She doesn't know protocol at all! How can they call her smart?!Welcome! and when she barged ahead in Morocco, she din't curtsey to the King of Morocco. Harry bowed. OMG.
I went into this article open minded and willing to admit that Kate has dressed like Diana too, it’s not just Meghan.Oh no I’ve copied both of them
I had a tartan dress oh hang on I had mine 1st
I also had the ruffle neck dresses like Diana wore before she did
There is no copying
It’s just that the styles have come back into fashion
I should have kept my two tone tonik keyhole back dresses from the early 70’s they might come back in fashion one day Lol
Ultron won.Y'all remember when I posted about our antiMM talk show host James Spader's CBS show was cancelled for coat cutting reasons last April (yeah. The same CBS that just paid Harpo $9m) and that he was picked up by Netflix? Oh yeah well he just bumped the Harpo show
Meg copied her like for like, psychobitchI went into this article open minded and willing to admit that Kate has dressed like Diana too, it’s not just Meghan.
I came out of it thinking what a load of horseshit! Firstly, most of the styles shown in the article are not copies at all, not even close. Secondly, this is a catalog of about 10 years worth of Kate’s outfits. A combination of the fact she has to dress in a certain, reserved and classic way, and the fact that fashion goes in cycles i.e. of course some looks will be similar to Diana’s shows how ridiculous this is.
MM on the other hand copied to a T, some of Diana’s most ‘statement’ looks. And she was only in the RF for 2 minutes, as opposed to Kate’s 10 years of outfits being compared.
View attachment 483266View attachment 483267
View attachment 482760
View attachment 482756
I actually wouldn't be surprised if she did run for American politics thinking she's this woke feminist who's going to be a saviour for all the vegans, women and POC... Even Trump fears her.
Hollywood actors always turn to politics following their acting career (she may now realize that even with Harry by her side hustling for her, her acting career is going nowhere hence turning to politics to stay relevant).
What stuff would you actually keep in storage <and where> when you are marrying into a family who allow you to buy furniture? I've moved countries several times and things follow me on trains, boats and airplanes if they are important, my teddy has his own passport as is always in my hand luggage! One thing they don't do is stay in a storage unit. She was living in a bliddy rental. Clothes go out of date. Paintings don't look right in different surroundings. What is the woman on? Such bolox.Welcome! and when she barged ahead in Morocco, she din't curtsey to the King of Morocco. Harry bowed. OMG.
That is why she legged it with Archie pretending to just be taking a bit of time off in Canada.... but instead went and got all her stuff out of storage (planning on staying in the UK, eh megsy?) and ARchie has never set foot in the UK again -- and never will. Its not like TQ is going to send in James Bond to recover a great grandchild in another country. She's probably like "yeah - I got enough on my hands"
It's dependent on The Queen dyingYou know what... you could be right. That could be the ACE in the hole for the Queen.. if that happened... markel would not know what hit her...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?