That’s the woke disease- character assassination, no evidence, shout scream and cry about bigotry till you get your own way.So what? In a democracy it’s the right of everyone to vote for whoever they like. Character assassinations on people who just don’t happen to think like you do is causing a lot of societies problems. And lots of black & hispanic people voted Trump. Entirely up to them.
Aren’t these accusations years old? I remember hearing she was a bully to staff a few years ago. Why investigations now? Why not then?I was thinking the same thing. There is no way they would bring in an external body without some evidence of wrongdoing on her side
It is not the responsibility of the palace to launch criminal investigations. It”s up to the US police.still nothing about Andrew though is there? Can independent investigations be extended to noncing??
I don’t like MM. my bullshit meter goes off at most things she says but there’s no denying this is shite considering Andrew.
True about it not being an Andrew thread, but I think it gets brought up because Meghan fans constantly use him as a scapegoat/way to take the spotlight off Meghan. I’ve seen people say ‘hating on an innocent black woman when you have an actual pweirdo in the family’. Slander, lies and also it’s totally irrelevant. Andrew is a creep, we’ve established. Doesn’t mean Meghan isn’t a disgusting vile narcissistic bitch does it.It is not the responsibility of the palace to launch criminal investigations. It”s up to the US police.
This is a thread about Harry & Meghan not Andrew.
I believe a case has only just been drawn up for it and a lot of staff who have worked with them have volunteered to share there stories about their experiences but, a majority of those who have come forward quit less than a year in so that shows something about the environmentAren’t these accusations years old? I remember hearing she was a bully to staff a few years ago. Why investigations now? Why not then?
That's a good point, has Meghan shot herself in the foot politically, by outlining her thoughts of suicide? Would someone with a history of poor mental health be allowed to run for president? (Ps nothing against people with MH issues) just wondering as I don't think you can be licensed for firearms in the Uk, never mind a big red buttonNobody is going to let someone claiming to be suicidal near the nuclear football. The Democrats will throw her off the debate stage if it even gets that far. One AOC in congress is quite enough.
I think it was most likely because she was Lady Diana before marriage. She married a prince so the public assumed she was no longer Lady Diana but instead was now Princess Diana. I only discovered in recent years that giving her that name was incorrect.I might be wrong but wasn’t she always known as Princess Diana? Obviously it’s quite unprecedented because she isn’t a blood royal but people didn’t just suddenly start calling her that when they realised they liked her? Or did they, I’m not sure !
I don't think mental health checks are something required to run for/take office. Plus, she could easily use it as part of her platform to continue victimizing herself (since that seems to be a popular tactic in modern politics, especially in the Democratic party) and say how she's overcome those thoughts and now she's stronger for it. I hate how easy it is to picture her actually running for office.That's a good point, has Meghan shot herself in the foot politically, by outlining her thoughts of suicide? Would someone with a history of poor mental health be allowed to run for president? (Ps nothing against people with MH issues) just wondering as I don't think you can be licensed for firearms in the Uk, never mind a big red button
I think because she seemed to be getting away with everything and the staff who were involved had basically had enough.. loyalty only stretches so far and once the whispers started and the newspapers got hold of it it then becomes something the palace can't ignoreAren’t these accusations years old? I remember hearing she was a bully to staff a few years ago. Why investigations now? Why not then?
Is it?! I thought it was more in terms of the protocols and titling... just a historical point.. ? Long live our lovely queen of course!All of this discussion about William and what will Kate be called is so fucking distasteful. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth is still alive. The direct heir is Prince Charles, not William, if HMTQ lives as long as her mother Charles will ascend the throne in 2028, if Charles lives as long as his Grandmother William will ascend the throne in 2057.
In what way is it distasteful? No one is saying they hope it happens soon but one day HM will die, so will Charles, so will I and so will you. Discussing what will happen is hardly chanting a death incantation.All of this discussion about William and what will Kate be called is so fucking distasteful. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth is still alive. The direct heir is Prince Charles, not William, if HMTQ lives as long as her mother Charles will ascend the throne in 2028, if Charles lives as long as his Grandmother William will ascend the throne in 2057.
She is disgusting. So angry that this trashy hideous nobody infiltrated our RF and not only that acts like she fucking runs it.Meghan Markle demands to see emails and texts on bullying allegations
KATE MANSEY: The Duchess of Sussex has written to Buckingham Palace demanding to see any documents, emails or text messages relating to the bullying complaint against her.www.dailymail.co.uk
The absolute audacity of this bitch!!
Girl, you are on fire tonight !It's all going tits up for Rachel the second rate mattress actress. She will have to get back to being yacht thot.
The Palace staff involved volunteered to give evidence in the court case that Ms Markle brought against ANL. They felt that the truth wasn't being evidenced and wanted to make things clear. I believe that when Ms Markle "won" her case staff decided to bring all this out into the open. Perhaps they wanted to tell their truth.Aren’t these accusations years old? I remember hearing she was a bully to staff a few years ago. Why investigations now? Why not then?
Oh I see. So when a Queen is on the throne her husband isn’t the king consort, obviously. Is this to do with the king being a more superior title to Queen? Sorry I just consider myself quite clued up about the royals but I don’t get this part of it!
I think they'd just collected her from her jail.I thought that too but she was photographed in the back of the jeep
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?