God love TDS
God love TDS
Here's the thing, though; he won't. He's seventh in line to the throne, he can't go off and play soldiers anymore, and he's realising that in the grand scheme of things, he's about as useful as a chocolate teapot. He's been seen as 'poor baby Harry' ever since Diana died. He's been babied and excused since 1997. Nothing is EVER his fault; it's always someone else's. And right now, he's coming across as that three year old throwing a tantrum in Tesco because he can't have the same sweeties as his big brother.It’s gone too far, Harry’s going to regret this FOREVER!!
Is the "Meghan and Eugenie are totes friends you guys!!!" being used to explain why she thought it was okay to announce her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding? And then her second pregnancy when Eugenie's child was born?Sorry if this has been mentioned before but if she and Eugeine were long time friends- how did she not understand any of the workings of the RF. it’s quite interesting that despite Andrew’s misdemeanours they spoke very positively about Fergie and the girls.
A perfect summationHere's the thing, though; he won't. He's seventh in line to the throne, he can't go off and play soldiers anymore, and he's realising that in the grand scheme of things, he's about as useful as a chocolate teapot. He's been seen as 'poor baby Harry' ever since Diana died. He's been babied and excused since 1997. Nothing is EVER his fault; it's always someone else's. And right now, he's coming across as that three year old throwing a tantrum in Tesco because he can't have the same sweeties as his big brother.
People here have already discussed Harry and Phillip stuff. If that sort of behaviour or opinions slip into outside conversations, or conversations which aren't public, that says a lot imo.Why do you think the Royal Family is racist?
Nail on the head! well putThe thing standing out for me, that I keep coming back to is when Oprah said somthing along the lines of, if you had the support/understanding you wanted, would you have left? And they both said no (paraphrasing with it all but you get my drift) So if you got your way, and what you wanted, and could do what you wanted then you'd have stayed? But what about the bad press? The racism? The lack of control of your own life?
It just seems they flounced off in a huff because they couldn't stay in the family but do and say whatever they wanted
I suspect that while Harry might not actively loathe William, it could be a different situation on the other side. Also it could just be me but what sort of normal person actively loathes their family?Stark choice for Palace: bare knuckle fight with the Sussexes or leave it to William to resolve (msn.com)
There are some interesting articles out there at the moment!!!!!
..Buckingham Palace has a clear if uninviting choice. It can enter a bare-knuckle fight with the Sussexes, pointing out that there are some inconsistencies in their account and that not all perceived slights are justified. Not giving Archie a title of prince was, for example, part of Charles’s plan for a slimmed-down monarchy.
Or, it can stay aloof and watch the latter part of the Queen’s reign overshadowed by a scathing attack on its conduct, underwritten by one of its own members. My guess is that it will fall to Prince William — one of the few male royals is Harry does not seem to actively loathe — to sort this mess out. No doubt we’ll hear much use of the royal go-to word in extremity — “saddened”. This time, it doesn’t even begin to cover it...
Not a word...yetDidn't watch it but read the highlights - am I right in assuming her own family and their disgusting behaviour was never mentioned?
I wonder what Black Twitter think about Meg describing herself as Caucasian when it suited her. Are they even aware of it?And so it begins!
And there is more
Remember when Bush (I think it was Bush anyway) came to stay at BP- they couldn’t believe how bad it was. I bet it was a shock to Meghan to see how frugally some royals live.She always thought she would be a Disney princess.....
It's the exact level of her understanding.
Stupid, stupid woman!!
I agree with some of what you say.There's a huge huge difference between meeting someone and actually living with someone, or being in close proximity with them, and therefore having interactions with them that go beyond things that you're probably asked to say.
Again, you wouldn't ask someone what colour their baby will be because that's too personal and therefore rude. Asking someone you live with or communicate with almost daily (because they're now family) is a whole different thing because the personal boundaries are less clear - stuff such as what colour a child would be is fine to ask if you're curious (which is what I think happened here). The conversations you have become far more personal and of course less scripted.
Do I think the RF is racist? Oh definitely. However, I don't think the fact that racism that may not obviously be racism to them but is to the general population, which actually has to interact with different cultures on more personal levels than diplomatic meetings and respect the developing culture regarding 'political correctness' (the word has harsh connotations but it's the best I have to offer lmao), makes them the most guilty people out there. Unless the comments were repeated after they were explained that the couple didn't feel comfortable with them, then yes you're very quickly slipping into a discussion where racism goes beyond just blissful ignorance.
Yes, not a word! I can only surmise that it’ll be mentioned on the next instalment - Gayle King programme I think, due UK time 12.00!Didn't watch it but read the highlights - am I right in assuming her own family and their disgusting behaviour was never mentioned?
Is the "Meghan and Eugenie are totes friends you guys!!!" being used to explain why she thought it was okay to announce her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding? And then her second pregnancy when Eugenie's child was born?
Ok I have to stop here, she has an International Relations degree, I do too. 70% of our classes in International Relations are International Relations History, so we do study -deeeeeeeply- all European Monarchies, there is no way she didn't have a good understanding of the RF.- She didn’t know about Harry, the royal family or what was expected of her. Yet we are constantly fed the narrative that she is highly intelligent and educated. Educated woman couldn’t operate Google? Or even feel curious enough to do so? If you're telling me no one informed her of what to do or what to expect, why didn’t she take the initiative herself? ‘Hit the ground running’ so to speak, and conduct her own research? If she didn’t then she comes across rather pathetic. But then we also have the rumours that she had Diana’s book, watched her wedding and the picture outside Buckingham palace! So was she completely ignorant in the picture, or is she lying now?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?