Harry and Meghan #33 When Needy met Greedy

[Miscanthus]

I wouldn't expect anything less. My mother did always say she could only take me anywhere twice, the second time to apologise for the first.
That's fab!!!! Another one on my list

Er....my mother said that too

Is a goop candle similar to a Gwyneth candle??

Goop is gwynie's brand.

 

[LadyMuck]

Not with Meghan, I came across the shady side of her after reading blinds that claimed she was deliberately 'channeling'
Diana to bag ginger whinger, included wearing the same perfume. .

Creepy AF

Very interesting.

 

[HereWeGoAgain101]

as I have a major fear of clowns........it's always difficult seeing your avatar

Here you go @Momof5intheStates Bringing out my Pagan side Go on now, tell me you’re afraid of witches Go ahead and light me up (thanks Taylor Swift)

 

[Flipping Hell !]

I think the whole thing is a serious load of BS! I personally think Megan and Harry are the escape goats for aul Andy and whatever else is going on. I have noticed that every time something big happens in America in relation to the Epstein enquiry some thing trivial and absurd appears in the UK media taking front and centre page About Meg and Harry or Peirs Morgan goes off on one just to remind us how awful they are . I think Harry wanted out and the queen said I will give u an out one condition you help me with non stories to hide the big story! We are crying about Megan taking Harry away (let them go, what does it matter) and no one is shouting looking Andrew questioned or held accountable!

I never thought of this and do you know IF the Queen doesn't do something massive in removing them completely from the RF I would think there's a bit of truth in it

 

[Facehugger]

It‘s one and the same

Ah, thank you.

I think I'm keeping up, so the Merkin smells like a mixture of Diana and Gwynnie Goop. Got it

 

[Melodybear]

I think she was. If not, the RF would have ammunition to throw her under the bus.

HOWEVER, I do think she “accentuated” her pregnancy to make her look more motherly and vulnerable. The wild ups and downs of her bump are suspicious but she clearly gained face weight and had an (even) thicker waist after the birth.

She probably ate more whilst waiting for the swelling to go down after her facial surgery

 

[Doodlebug005]

Meghan's attempt to keep friends' names secret in newspaper battle | ITV News

The Duchess of Sussex’s legal team is back in the High Court in her continuing fight with the Mail on Sunday. | ITV National News

www.itv.com

 

[NOID-phal]

About this Aunty, the case surely hinges on the fact that the famous five were integral in the debacle. How can they, as key witnesses, be anonymous? As a lay person I kind of can’t see how they can be kept private. It’s been made such a public issue it’s now in the public interest to know who we are dealing with. I’d love to be a fly on any of their walls


Worth their salt indeed!

I thought Meghan wanted their identities kept secret up until the point they had to give evidence, cos the mail/all media would doorstep them and their families, publish everything they could find out?

 

[Facehugger]

I got confused then when you said Penny-Wise I’m obviously gonna have to change my avatar to something I can actually remember

Whoops, sorry, didn't mean to confuse you. Noooo, keep it, it's cool

 

[Palpatine]

New thread

Harry and Meghan #34 Maleficent Meghan and her Petulant Prince'

After flipping a coin exhaustive research this lovely new title was deemed the winner. There is no manager here so suck it up Karen! Many thanks to @Scotch Mist who provided it. So what happened in the last thread I hear you ask. Well, if you really want to know then you should read it...

tattle.life

 

[Blade Runner]

I wouldn't read too much into price drops, this is standard marketing practice. People buy at the cheaper price because they think they're getting a bargain so it encourages sales. Then word spreads, more people buy and eventually the price goes up again when the publisher has made back their costs.

Yes, and Scobie’s royalties will be based on the list price he set. He may even sell more at the lower price.

I’ve used up my ‘free’ views for the week. Any chance somebody could post the text of The Times article?

I’ve used up my ‘free’ views for the week. Any chance somebody could post the text of The Times article?

MogTheCat on page one.

 

[Baguette]

I don’t think the outcome will change anyone’s view of her. She desperately tries to control the narrative- which she can with Harry and those close to her, but no matter how she tries to control the public view, she looks incredibly calculated. The legal action especially. I invisige her attempts at martyrdom to only polarise and intrench the views people already hold


Is this meant to be a link to the new thread?

Still just a suggestion - there are a few to choose from at the moment.

 

[Blade Runner]

I’m not subscribed to this. But I bet he just couldn’t be arsed with their whining

More likely he had to hurry home in time for one of his lady callers.

 

[Blade Runner]

Sorry no Scobie would have no say on how much the book is sold for. I worked in publishing for many years and can answer most publishing related questions.
Standard practice with a book like this would be for the authors to have an 'advance of money' before the book comes out. This means that the advance is added to the costs of producing the book. Other costs are typesetting, proof reading, editing, cover design, paper/printing etc. Marketing and storage are also cost factors. After taking all of this into account the publisher then determines the unit cost for producing each book. The book cannot be sold for less than the unit cost but it will initially be marketed at a much higher cost.
Scobie will have signed a contract giving him a percentage of the net sales (eg. 10%) and he won't get any royalties until the publisher has covered the initial costs (including any advance paid) and made a profit.
I suspect he won't see any more money from the publication for quite some time yet unless it becomes a runaway best seller.

Thank you for that info.
That’s what happens when I don’t google first.

 

[Pom Bear]

Thank you xx

On fire @Pom Bear ‘tissssss

 

[Flipping Hell !]

Seems very iffy to me

 

[LadyMuck]

Taz's latest video

 

[Loftcat]

Loooool xx



Looooooool xx

 

[Scotch Mist]

Lady Colin’s book is very forensic and quotes a lot of sources.
it also starts way back from meghan’s childhood.
i haven’t finished it yet, but it is really interesting how she places all the circumstantial évidence that Meghan used a surrogate, without outright saying it.
She also talks a lot about Diana (bearing in mind she wrote a biography about her).

The Scobie book is more detailed, as it would be as it’s from the horse’s mouth.

Thanks

 

[cosmo girl]

Meghan Markle's Wikipedia changed before relationship revealed

A reference to Meghan Markle's appearances on Deal or No Deal in the US were also removed from the page on October 9, 2016. Her relationship with Prince Harry was made public later that month.

www.dailymail.co.uk