This is confusing, as a Daily Mail article dated 7th February says that the Judge has ruled that the Stoats WILL be questioned. Plus a long list of others.
I don't understand how the Ho's remarks about whether HM or Charles are racist were ever relevant, nor the Ho's remarks about her seeing herself as an only child, or about her father.
I thought the issue was that the Ho had slandered Sam in her book about 3 children by 3 different fathers, all taken from her care, and other defamation. This in Finding Freedom came directly from the Ho via JK to Aphid, and there is proof of this.
Where do Florida publication laws come in that the Judge is now struggling with? Has she just started struggling now?
If this is the case why did Sam's attorneys not know about Florida publication laws?
What has changed? Something has. Have strings been pulled?
Can our US Attorney Tattlers shed some light? I'm completely out of my depth here!