TRG. The Spare PR machine is working hard.
Maybe keeping open for it to thewow...this is .......interesting, extremely interesting.....after this latest ........publicity, I wouldnt be surprised!
Thank you to everyone who is keeping these threads updated......im still bemused as to the point of the book and all this publicity..
The book seems to be written in such a childish and overblown way, I was thinking of comparing it to something like The Secret Garden, where the poor neglected rich girl, whose family dont care for her at all, finds salvation in a garden! But thats a fictional childrens book. Not reality by any stretch of the imagination.
Also the book has obviously been written by an American, with little or no knowledge of British culture, saying things like The Queen of England!!! huh
So weird. Does Colbert always offer his guests cocktails?Stephen Colbert asks "Would you like a cocktail before we begin?" and Harry enthusiastically responds
View attachment 1873372
ingenious thread titleThanks to @Churchill's Ghost for the new thread title. Im posting new thread then will edit later with recap!
old thread here
Harry and Meghan #298 The half price Prince
BIB This is exactly why the RF adopt the never complain never explain policy. It would take scores of people to answer every single negative story in the press. Plus answering them generates more column inches - as evidenced by this book. It seems it is by far the best policy to ignore things...tattle.life
The fallout continues from the book. @JAR21has been religiously recording all the bits and bobs in the wiki.
if you’re new to the thread you can grab the popcorn and watch away, say hi (which I never did, I’m an introvert so I kinda slipped into to the convo a while ago but I promise you everyone is lovely).
The book is its own statement. Read and make your own opinion.
As always with the Harkles, a plethora of inconsistencies. Thank you to @Anna2020 for the posts.
And an off topic shoutout to @ChaoticArtist for her great exam result!
This is a friendly but cynical and sarcastic community that is well informed about the Harkles. As said at the start of the post, if you’re new and inquisitive about the train wreck that is the Harkles, wiki is in pink at top of page!
About that revelation on how many HE killed, he whinges he was taken out of context... HUH?? He shouldn't haveWhat the duck!! He says in interview that the goal of writing the passage on the Taliban was to reduce the number of suicides amongst veterans!
How?
What bleeping planet is this twit living on?
He’s in some kind of alternate reality where paid audience members cheer the utter drivel that spews from his mouth.
Spoken like a total piss head,Stephen Colbert asks "Would you like a cocktail before we begin?" and Harry enthusiastically responds
View attachment 1873372
H (or his ghostwriter or his puppetmaster wife) shouldn't have read so much Mills and Boon at an impressionable age, the writing style is sickly, nauseating tosh, let alone the self-serving content.I WOKE TO a text from Jason.
Bad news.
What is it now?
The Mail on Sunday had printed the private letter Meg had written to her father. The letter that Granny and Pa urged her to write.
February 2019.
I was in bed, Meg was lying next to me, still asleep. I waited a bit, then broke the news to her softly.
Your father’s given your letter to the Mail.
No.
Meg, I don’t know what to say, he’s given them your letter.
That moment, for me, was decisive. About Mr. Markle, but also about the press. There had been so many moments, but that for me was The One. I didn’t want to hear any more talk of protocols, tradition, strategy. Enough, I thought. Enough.
The paper knew it was illegal to publish that letter, they knew full well, and did it anyway. Why? Because they also knew Meg was defenseless. They knew she didn’t have the staunch support of my family, and how else could they have known this, except from people close to the family? Or inside the family?
There was nothing in that letter to be ashamed about. A daughter pleading with her father to behave decently? Meg stood by every word. She’d always known it might be intercepted, that one of her father’s neighbors, or one of the paps staking out his house, might steal his post. Anything was possible. But she never stopped to think her father would actually offer it, or that a paper would actually take it—and print it.
And edit it. Indeed, that might have been the most galling thing, the way the editors cut and pasted Meg’s words to make them sound less loving.
But the pain was compounded tenfold by the simultaneous interviews with alleged handwriting experts, who analyzed Meg’s letter and inferred from the way she crossed her Ts or curved her Rs that she was a terrible person.
Rightward slant? Over-emotional.
Highly stylized? Consummate performer.
Uneven baseline? No impulse control.
The look on Meg’s face as I told her about these libels rolling out…I knew my way around grief, and there was no mistaking it—this was pure grief. She was mourning the loss of her father, and she was also mourning the loss of her own innocence. She reminded me in a whisper, as if someone might be listening, that she’d taken a handwriting class in high school, and as a result she’d always had excellent penmanship. People complimented her. She’d even used this skill at university to earn spare money. Nights, weekends, she’d inscribed wedding and birthday-party invitations, to pay the rent. Now people were trying to say that this was some kind of window into her soul? And the window was dirty?
Meg wanted to sue. Me too. Rather, we both felt we had no choice. If we didn’t sue over this, we said, what kind of signal would that be sending? To the press? To the world? So we conferred again with the Palace lawyer. We were given a runaround.
I reached out to Pa and Willy. They’d both sued the press in the past over invasions and lies.
Pa sued over so-called Black Spider Letters, his memos to government officials. Willy sued over topless photos of Kate. But both vehemently opposed the idea of Meg and me taking any legal action. Why? I asked. They hummed and hahed. The only answer I could get out of them was that it simply wasn’t advisable. The done thing, etc.
I told Meg: You’d think we were suing a dear friend of theirs.
Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex.
BIB - In his ear? She wrote the damn thing, imo.'The tears in her eyes glistened in the spring sunshine'
What the actual duck is this pish? An autobiography or a chick-lit book..im beginning to think she has been in his ear with this book, no way would a man think that
Jesus bleeping wept.
Easily fooled people,Why are all the comments on the Colbert interview so positive? Is public opinion changing? bleeping sycophants
IT DOESNT MAKE ANY SENSE she would still be numb from the epidural 2 hours later and then slowly recovering. Also they have to catheterise you with an epidural, which means you would then need that removed and pass your trial without catheter - i.e. monitored for several hours to make sure you wee enough. Also she seems to go from minimal dilation to pushing the baby out instantaneously.Within two hours of our son being born we were back at Frogmore.