I hear there's a vacancy in North Korea ....
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I would imagine that Kate releases the pix for free. It's far less intrusive for the children to have their mum taking photos of them than having a photographer come over to do it and they can control exactly what they want to put out. Kate is also a good photographer.
I'd like to read that but I'm not going to subscribeI’m not usually a fan of Camilla Long’s work but that piece in The Times was terrific
Except it’s probably about Julianne Hough and her husband.
Like A Puppy Dog - BLIND GOSSIP
[Blind Gossip] We told you months ago that this marriage was in trouble and that the wife was manipulating her husband. Want a little more insight into what is going on behind the scenes? Of course you do! Here you go. It may be hard to see this now, but he used to be a […]blindgossip.com
Yet another stellar 'blind' from BG.....
Making a fuss about a pic of archiedoll it will only be a black and white one from the back anyway. 
Oh wow, how super kind of them to show the peasants a photo
Thread title suggestion Harry and Meghan #19 Harry don’t be a muppet, you’re just Meg’s stupid puppet
Looking at the comments. People think it's the MarklesLike A Puppy Dog - BLIND GOSSIP
[Blind Gossip] We told you months ago that this marriage was in trouble and that the wife was manipulating her husband. Want a little more insight into what is going on behind the scenes? Of course you do! Here you go. It may be hard to see this now, but he used to be a […]
Yet another stellar 'blind' from BG.....
I didn't have to subscribe, I just hit the X when they asks me to sign up.
I didn't have to subscribe either but here it is:
Meghan the narcissist gets her day in court, but she’s too blind to see she’s already lost
Camilla Long
Sunday April 26 2020, 12.01am, The Sunday Times
The trial of the decade kicked off on Friday morning, with much excited fiddling online — a pre-trial hearing conducted, “trickily”, on Microsoft Teams. In one window, the duchess’s little Italian waiter QC appeared, with a plume of glossy turkey hair. In another, there was the silent, clipped, gravedigger QC for the defence, representing The Mail on Sunday and its case for printing Thomas Markle’s letter. Both were in rooms that had been blurred out, while the purring judge — a man not unlike Alan Rickman — sat in a normal Harry Potter panelled courtroom.
Along with 80 or so other journalists, I watched the whole thing from start to finish. It felt vast and important, like Leveson part two. At one point, it lookedless like a trial of the matter at hand and more like a trial of the press in general. If Prince Harry has his way, it will be a monstrous, all-consuming, neverending rapture: a terrible reckoning, a Book of Revelation for the people he hates. For Meghan it will involve an end-times level of self-promotion and publicity. Guess what? She will take the stand. It is their dream circus.
Be in no doubt: this is a circus. It seemed astonishing to me that these skilled and pre-eminent men, with 100 years of experience between them, should waste any time discussing a story of such effervescing Marie Antoinettish frippery and thin-skinned triviality. There was talk of “post-Naomi Campbell jurisprudence” and a comic moment when they stopped to consider whether Meghan’s “favourite snack”, avocados, fuelled “human rights abuses, drought and murder”. That was before we got to the 75 pages of articles that had displeased the couple. First impression: neither the duchess nor Harry can take criticism.
Second impression: for someone who doesn’t like to talk about her private life, the duchess sure does want to talk about it. Before this trial, we knew little about her relationship with her grim Honey Bear father; now there’s little we don’t. The hearing made reference to a whole 33 further pages of mostly personal content she made available 10 days ago, including texts to her father from Meghan and Harry before their wedding.
The messages add absolutely nothing. In one, she appears concerned for her father’s “health and safety”. In another, she seems most interested in getting “security” to the hospital where he’s just had heart surgery, presumably to stop him talking to the press. So why release them? Perhaps to provide a mirage of openness, give the impression she’s happy to lay it all out when she isn’t. If anything, the couple come across as unhealthily obsessed with the press and their own image.
But then, the duchess is someone who thinks she can win at anything; be the centre of all attention; have the moral upper hand in any dispute. Her own ego blinds her; it even blinds the people working for her, like her poor QC struggling to keep up with the vastness of her pompous submissions. I am no fan of the royal family, and in many ways I’d hoped she would expose them as the pale, stale charisma vacuums they are, but at least they have the humility to know when to stop, instead of throwing themselves into this extraordinary trial and its ramifications — the hundreds of pages of overshare, plus the added negative publicity that will never end.
Who wins is irrelevant — in many ways she has already lost. There will be a day’s headlines if she prevails after two, three, even four weeks of lashing stories about her destructive ambition and unedifying obsession with her image. Meanwhile she is reducing the pair of them to supermarket magazine fodder, telling Harry he’s getting better, when he is in fact getting worse. She will brush the whole trial aside as yet another injustice, whatever happens: “See what they made me do,” she will say, by way of explaining the roomfuls of dirty linen about to be laundered. It’s as mad as a box of prancing kippers.
By the end of it, Harry will secretly wish to go back to the relative anonymity of being a royal, living in peace at Frogmore, able to fully disappear once he’s clocked out of the day’s work, just like a normal person would. Royals are the most anonymous celebs in the world — Prince William, for example, lives in obscurity. We don’t know where he buys his clothes, gets his food, even where he goes on holiday. He had a whole job and none of us knew anything about it. As he appeared outside his house on Thursday to clap the NHS, I realised I didn’t even know whether he would like his own front door. All those riches, and all that power and no effort — it is the dream, and Harry is probably already missing it.
Meghan the narcissist gets her day in court, but she’s too blind to see she’s already lost
Camilla Long
Sunday April 26 2020, 12.01am, The Sunday Times
The trial of the decade kicked off on Friday morning, with much excited fiddling online — a pre-trial hearing conducted, “trickily”, on Microsoft Teams. In one window, the duchess’s little Italian waiter QC appeared, with a plume of glossy turkey hair. In another, there was the silent, clipped, gravedigger QC for the defence, representing The Mail on Sunday and its case for printing Thomas Markle’s letter. Both were in rooms that had been blurred out, while the purring judge — a man not unlike Alan Rickman — sat in a normal Harry Potter panelled courtroom.
Along with 80 or so other journalists, I watched the whole thing from start to finish. It felt vast and important, like Leveson part two. At one point, it lookedless like a trial of the matter at hand and more like a trial of the press in general. If Prince Harry has his way, it will be a monstrous, all-consuming, neverending rapture: a terrible reckoning, a Book of Revelation for the people he hates. For Meghan it will involve an end-times level of self-promotion and publicity. Guess what? She will take the stand. It is their dream circus.
Be in no doubt: this is a circus. It seemed astonishing to me that these skilled and pre-eminent men, with 100 years of experience between them, should waste any time discussing a story of such effervescing Marie Antoinettish frippery and thin-skinned triviality. There was talk of “post-Naomi Campbell jurisprudence” and a comic moment when they stopped to consider whether Meghan’s “favourite snack”, avocados, fuelled “human rights abuses, drought and murder”. That was before we got to the 75 pages of articles that had displeased the couple. First impression: neither the duchess nor Harry can take criticism.
Second impression: for someone who doesn’t like to talk about her private life, the duchess sure does want to talk about it. Before this trial, we knew little about her relationship with her grim Honey Bear father; now there’s little we don’t. The hearing made reference to a whole 33 further pages of mostly personal content she made available 10 days ago, including texts to her father from Meghan and Harry before their wedding.
The messages add absolutely nothing. In one, she appears concerned for her father’s “health and safety”. In another, she seems most interested in getting “security” to the hospital where he’s just had heart surgery, presumably to stop him talking to the press. So why release them? Perhaps to provide a mirage of openness, give the impression she’s happy to lay it all out when she isn’t. If anything, the couple come across as unhealthily obsessed with the press and their own image.
But then, the duchess is someone who thinks she can win at anything; be the centre of all attention; have the moral upper hand in any dispute. Her own ego blinds her; it even blinds the people working for her, like her poor QC struggling to keep up with the vastness of her pompous submissions. I am no fan of the royal family, and in many ways I’d hoped she would expose them as the pale, stale charisma vacuums they are, but at least they have the humility to know when to stop, instead of throwing themselves into this extraordinary trial and its ramifications — the hundreds of pages of overshare, plus the added negative publicity that will never end.
Who wins is irrelevant — in many ways she has already lost. There will be a day’s headlines if she prevails after two, three, even four weeks of lashing stories about her destructive ambition and unedifying obsession with her image. Meanwhile she is reducing the pair of them to supermarket magazine fodder, telling Harry he’s getting better, when he is in fact getting worse. She will brush the whole trial aside as yet another injustice, whatever happens: “See what they made me do,” she will say, by way of explaining the roomfuls of dirty linen about to be laundered. It’s as mad as a box of prancing kippers.
By the end of it, Harry will secretly wish to go back to the relative anonymity of being a royal, living in peace at Frogmore, able to fully disappear once he’s clocked out of the day’s work, just like a normal person would. Royals are the most anonymous celebs in the world — Prince William, for example, lives in obscurity. We don’t know where he buys his clothes, gets his food, even where he goes on holiday. He had a whole job and none of us knew anything about it. As he appeared outside his house on Thursday to clap the NHS, I realised I didn’t even know whether he would like his own front door. All those riches, and all that power and no effort — it is the dream, and Harry is probably already missing it.
I think this will end in merching Meg paying HIM. He’s useless, stupid and broke.
If you go to the ‘similar articles’ or whatever it’s called link, it’s about Hough and hubby. BG’s links are usually a big clue as to who the blind is about.
i think they used a photographer in the royal household when George was born, but by the time Charlotte was born; Kate took all the photos.
They're much more natural.
Ive noticed also that most of them are taken outside, usually by a wall or a door so we don’t get too much information about their homes.
agreed Kate doesn’t charge a fee. Even if she did I’m sure she would donate it to charity; but that becomes the thin end of the wedge.
Wouldn’t that be ironic, if the California divorce laws work in Harry’s favour!
im pretty sure the trust fund would be excluded as it’s money acquired before the marriage.
Thread title idea: A growing realisation that we have no clout, quick quick chuck a picture of Archie out!
Mmm. Two weeks ago did Kate announce that in two weeks time she’d be giving us a photo of Louis on his second birthday? Who the actual f@ck ‘announces’ that they’re giving the world a photo two weeks in advance? Trying to keep the plebs and the sugars waiting for a photograph of this child, who’s so much more important than anyone else’s, like it’s the second coming. He’s not Jesus Christ. He’s no more important than anyone else’s baby.
Can I hear 'Just Harry' replying "I can't, there are cameras" to his dad? ( about 0:26)
Do you think PC said - tell her to STFU, it is MY party"?
Camilla in "don't mess with me" mode swoops in to make sure they know they are leaving, and the tophatter formation escort them to the door just to make sure. Sigh. Love the RF closing ranks perfection.
Do you think PC said - tell her to STFU, it is MY party"?
Camilla in "don't mess with me" mode swoops in to make sure they know they are leaving, and the tophatter formation escort them to the door just to make sure. Sigh. Love the RF closing ranks perfection.
Trying to steal the Thunder from Charlotte as it’s her birthday first.
Heres Kate’s pictures of her children
Princess Kate and Prince William's sweetest family photos
The Princess of Wales is a keen photographer!
www.hellomagazine.com
What exactly did they do to be asked to leave?Can I hear 'Just Harry' replying "I can't, there are cameras" to his dad? ( about 0:26)
Do you think PC said - tell her to STFU, it is MY party"?
Camilla in "don't mess with me" mode swoops in to make sure they know they are leaving, and the tophatter formation escort them to the door just to make sure. Sigh. Love the RF closing ranks perfection.
i read somewhere it was something about overshadowing Charles.
The closing ranks and ejecting them was priceless to watch
Whats with the walking ? She's not on a bloody catwalkCan I hear 'Just Harry' replying "I can't, there are cameras" to his dad? ( about 0:26)
Do you think PC said - tell her to STFU, it is MY party"?
Camilla in "don't mess with me" mode swoops in to make sure they know they are leaving, and the tophatter formation escort them to the door just to make sure. Sigh. Love the RF closing ranks perfection.
I love this suggestion
The fact that Harry is letting his wife release a tell all book bitching about his family and spreading malicious lies about the RBF. He's a bleeping drippy snowflaky mamma's boy. He needs to grow a pair
Didn’t they walk through the middle of an investiture during their last visit home? Looks like they have form for appearingwhere they’re not welcome & turning into all about them!Can I hear 'Just Harry' replying "I can't, there are cameras" to his dad? ( about 0:26)
Do you think PC said - tell her to STFU, it is MY party"?
Camilla in "don't mess with me" mode swoops in to make sure they know they are leaving, and the tophatter formation escort them to the door just to make sure. Sigh. Love the RF closing ranks perfection.
The Toxic And Tiresome Harkle Countdown Trip Review
We all knew the Sussex duo would have a few tricks left up their sleeves when they arrived back in the UK for their final engagements as working members of the RF, but when we look back at their &#…
harrymarkle.wordpress.com
Apparently, earlier that day, the duo ‘accidentally’ found their way into an Investiture that Charles was holding at BP, which took the light off the guests that were being honoured that day.
- Status