Of course Hazznot and wife are at the top...maybe he pays hmself for playing polo.
Harry and Meghan #133 Cable actress sits at her throne, Harry's lights are on but nobody's home
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It is the only thing he remotely good at. I always said he should offer to be a coach for the Santa Barbara Polo Club. He also only loves it when he isn't playing with William, who is better at it than him.
I suspects it is also the bit about torturing the ponies that he likes. The insurance on the ponies Mr Stabby was allocated must have been astronomical.
God, I bet he DOES pay himself an appearance fee and probably also a ‘management’ fee to the twatface as well
Definitely... he included his salary and PR costs. Sentenbale might even receive and bleeping invoice from Fartwell AND His Royal Hypocrite and so Sentebale will actually lose money from this gig. Her Royal Hysteric will probably charge for her mental health coaching support and the "brownies" she made for the team
It’s just risible, isn’t it? What kind of moron would you have to be to believe that was real?
I think pap shots of celebrities kids have to be pixelated unless they have permission from the parents.
I was thinking about how long it will take to see a family group, the four of them sat under a tree perhaps, in a photo like W&K release every now and then. (As if, unless it involved mega bucks)
When I, and thousands of others raise money for charities, it never goes through our bank accounts first, it goes straight to the charity and they obviously have overheads which we can do nothing about.
What really gets my goat is why it has to go through Archeholes Foundation first? I can answer my own question really - so they can cream off as much as they can by inventing all sorts of expenses until the final amount handed over to the charity is the minimum 5%. Isn't that the only reason why Archeholes is registered in Delaware, or wherever, because that State has the lowest percentage rate in the country of how much raised has to be actually given to charity. I believe other States, like California which would be the obvious place to register it because they live there, have a much higher rate.
The miserly 5% going to the charity is then reduced even further by the charity covering their overheads.
Noballs has announced that he is going to do more personal charity appearances through Arseholes Foundation, in other words he is going to pocket vast amounts of money by conning people who don't realise what he's up to.
Last edited:
We all know one list she is going to be appearing on ......... Grifter of the YearLooks like Meghan wasn't invited to the Met Gala. Her sugar's justification is that 'it's better that she waits until she is co-chair'.
It's going to be a loooong wait, Lainey:
PEOPLE dedicates this week's cover to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as they enter "the era of visibility"
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are apparently planning to be more visibly in the public eye beginning this fall as they cover this week's edition of PEOPLE Magazinewww.laineygossip.com
It makes it clear why Meghan pushed Amanda Gorman to be part of her incredibly weak 40 x40 project, she was trying to butter her up to get on the list.
How long before his "friends" get sick of him catching lifts on jets for free? If he was as wealthy as they would like us to believe they would have their own private jet..... blagging free flights , sofa surfing at Perrys.... A lot of taking, not much giving ...
Rather like the villains in Mills and Boon romances who are always borrowing/getting credit based on an inheritance they are expecting to receive.
I think there are a lot of villains in real life who are doing that too.
The smartass at the pub that disappears when it is their round
... People will cop on to hazza sponging eventually 
JMO but it's the quid pro quo of moving in the same social circles as Royalty, isn't it?
Hazza provides them with that status and in return they provide him with freebies/benefits.
Same reason Andy got away with the grift for so long.
Yorks and Sussexes. Ligging and blagging, the lot of them.
Last edited:
I wish the DM or even better The Times/Telegraph/The Guardian, do an expose on their and similar foundations, it is nothing short of embezzlement . How these people can live with themselves I honestly do not know. Nasty Lot its a disgrace and they should be exposed.
I agree with you. adopted children's photos can't be released publicly until 6 months old Plus. I would assume if you're adopting a child of say toddler age that would also apply . Children's faces change so much in 6 months so keep the privacy of the child.
Paps have to pixelate the child's face unless otherwise approved by the parent/s. so that was very much a pap merchandising walk with Farchie.
I also believe in California the surrogate has the right to keep the child if she ultimately decides she wants to keep it. Other states my vary.
I did wonder whether the surrogacy fell through and the surrogate took the child and 6 and wife had to find another child to adopt... it will all come out one day, secrets like this will surface for sure .
Last edited:
I wonder if it's Harry who is insisting that no photographs of the dollies happen. I'm quite sure that left to her own devices, smegs would be merching those kids for as much money as she can get out of them. Didn't the photo of Archie going to school happen when Harry was away somewhere? Or am I imagining that? Just a thought.
Royal Family (not very yummy) chocolate bars 
Won't click on it, it's her bestie Lainey Lui. Another Soho ho.Looks like Meghan wasn't invited to the Met Gala. Her sugar's justification is that 'it's better that she waits until she is co-chair'.
It's going to be a loooong wait, Lainey:
PEOPLE dedicates this week's cover to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as they enter "the era of visibility"
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are apparently planning to be more visibly in the public eye beginning this fall as they cover this week's edition of PEOPLE Magazine
It makes it clear why Meghan pushed Amanda Gorman to be part of her incredibly weak 40 x40 project, she was trying to butter her up to get on the list.
I've said that a lot. I think she totally rules the roost (pun intended) and drives their lifestyle but he is firm on that one thing, no photies of the sprogs, and he isn't budging on it. She bypassed the rule in Vancouver with the pap walk while no6 was still in the UK battling with granny to get the things they wanted. Then the school pap walk scam was while no6 was over in the UK for the funeral.
Eventually she'll get her way, but at the moment I think no6 has made "no kid images" the hill he will die on. (till the money runs out).
Last edited:
You could be right about Hazno being the one who is paranoid about the kids being photographed. I think Smeggy would love to use them for merching and to promote herself as a caring mumWon't click on it, it's her bestie Lainey Lui. Another Soho ho.
I've said that a lot. I think she totally rules the roost (pun intended) and drives their lifestyle but he is firm on that one thing, no photies of the sprogs, and he isn't budging on it. She bypassed the rule in Vancouver with the pap walk while no6 was still in the UK battling with granny to get the things they wanted. Then the school pap walk scam was while no6 was over in the UK for the funeral.
Eventually she'll get her way, but at the moment I think no6 has made "no kid images" the hill he will die on. (till the money runs out).
Thing is babies change a lot in the first year. Releasing a photo of LiliBucks as a new born wouldn't actually make her recognisable at all. So really they're being pretty dumb about that.
One photo would have shown us that the child exists but they would obviously prefer everyone to think that something sinister is going on - like the kids are really just dolls
Absolutely inspired - I might have included a Beatrice 'Aerohead'
This. 100%.
Not gonna lie, the exposé of the charidees has shocked and disappointed me. At this point I'll stick with local food banks and gifting items to local based charities.
So if nothing else we have to thank the snarkles for causing us to be educated on that scamming.
There's a few here that are appropriate for those 2
- Status