Harry and Meghan #133 Cable actress sits at her throne, Harry's lights are on but nobody's home

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts

Cinnamon.girl

freda19 said:
Same school bag on fake farchie too.
Click to expand...
Yes Farch/Gavin has been clamped onto Noballs's right side. Noballs's right hand is brown'ish as it's really Minge's right hand, and his left hand is white'ish as he has taken ownership of it and it is actually his own hand. Hence the difference in colour.
What tos...ers. The two photos are identical but with dire photoshopped Gavin for them arriving in Aspen carried by NoBalls. The baby carried by Minge in the Aspen photo pretending to be Lil is the baby Farch from the first SA tour photo and is probably a doll.

The old Farch is now posing as his sister for the paps in Aspen, and the new Farch carried by NoBalls is an old photo of Gavin! It's like musical babies or pass the parcel and it's difficult to get your head round. You couldn't make it up.
What is the matter with these people???
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 30

Scotch Mist

Who did the fake pic of the invisible children? Was it a sugar?

I keep wondering when we will see the kids. They can't possibly live a normal(ish) posho life and never take them out anywhere. Once they get older they'll have to socialise with others. If they never go out the kids are prisoners! someone will get a photo eventually.

IF they exist of course
 
Reactions: 33

Maggiemaynot

Lovelymonty said:
Fake. That's Archie's supposed first day at school, complete with backpack.
Click to expand...
Archie can’t go to school. Nor kindergarten or even on a play date. Don’t you remember?
His mother is too famous. She certainly made a point of it at the time, when he was just a baby. The biggest movie stars, world famous royalty, the biggest politicians on the planet, their kids can all go to school etc.
But not Meg’s offspring. It’s a well known fact. They just can’t. I’m not sure what might happen to them if they have to mingle with other kids but it’s certainly not on the cards because she is too famous.
That’s why they have to hole up wherever the fuck they are holing up. Poor kids are never going to see the light of day because their mother is too famous.
It’s not easy being her you know.
Ok, fair enough, the world might be in crisis and there are people who might not see tomorrow but all that pales into insignificance compared to what she has to go through.
But she is magnanimous enough to forget her own troubles and along with her husband, (a henpecked streak of piss if ever I saw one) release a compassionate statement to the world saying nothing of any consequence because they’re speechless.
Like I said, it’s hard being her.
 
Reactions: 62

Pom Bear

It's the year 2030.
Harry and Farch are spotted at the airport!

Loooool x.

 
Reactions: 43
S

silvergirl

Scotch Mist said:
Hazno has had that lump on his head for ages. It's not a recent thing. See pic below when he was younger.

It's where he keeps his brain cell

View attachment 721047
Click to expand...
When I was a very young girl in Catholic school, there was a scary book way in the back of the nun’s cabinet. Being a curious sort, I grabbed it and read, that book shook the shit out of me. This was a book about the devil and how horns would grow out of the devils’ head. Ever since I have looked for this when meeting people. Make of that what you will.
 
Reactions: 29
S

silvergirl

The twat is full of shit. A plain little Jane who has done all she can do surgery wise to be hottt. What an idiot. She is one of a million little skanks. Nothing special at all. Get ovah ya self.
 
Reactions: 34

Pom Bear

Farch is now in a residential home and enjoying his later life with other residents x.

A few comment that he doesn't look a day over 2

 
Reactions: 57
D

Dooley Doo

50sGirl said:
Is this photo real?
Archie looks like he’s been photoshopped in because he is more in focus than the others.
Click to expand...
That is what I thought. Could it be when they arrived in Africa or somewhere else and Smeg is carrying Farchie.
I think Smeg would have a very special blanket for her Lidl.
 
Reactions: 21

Murphy Brown

Looks like Meghan wasn't invited to the Met Gala. Her sugar's justification is that 'it's better that she waits until she is co-chair'.
It's going to be a loooong wait, Lainey:

PEOPLE dedicates this week's cover to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as they enter "the era of visibility"

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are apparently planning to be more visibly in the public eye beginning this fall as they cover this week's edition of PEOPLE Magazine
www.laineygossip.com

It makes it clear why Meghan pushed Amanda Gorman to be part of her incredibly weak 40 x40 project, she was trying to butter her up to get on the list.
 
Reactions: 40

HadBax

YeltsinsTank said:
Bad photoshop job. My mom could have done better than this with an exacto knife and rubber cement.
Click to expand...
My 16-year old dog could have done better with his sharp toenails and his slobber. (OT: my pup looks a lot like a real life version of the dog emoji! )
 
Reactions: 30

Xales

holden9 said:
Loving DM's article title today for Prince Self-Important

Eco-warrior Prince Harry is accused of hypocrisy as he touches down in Santa Barbara on friend's £45m private jet after two hour flight from charity polo match
Click to expand...
Is Scoobie trolling them?

'They are now in their thriving stage!'

What the actual fuck. Disgusting enough her whinge fest while amongst the poorest in Africa. He really thinks that writing they are now in their thriving stage whilst the world had gone to shit with covid and millions upon millions are barely surviving makes the multi millionaires look like good compassionate people?

As to they are now going to be more visible. Please no.

And people had to get H on the cover that must piss M off at least
 
Reactions: 34

wisebutwild

For want of something to discuss does anybody know/remember the rules in California about showing photos of adopted children? I know this was mentioned a while back on here and 6 months seems to be stuck in my head but I could be wrong (usually am).

I still have a feeling Lidl has been adopted so, if that was the case, there is the time to take for the adoption to go through plus this rule about not showing photos of adopted kids for X number of months. It could be a while yet before the first picture appears.

Also, does anyone know the rules in California if a child is born to a surrogate - if either the sperm or the egg of one of the 'parents' is used do they still have to legally adopt the child or is the child just handed over automatically and that's it. As you can see I'm not very knowledgeable about surrogate births.
 
Reactions: 24
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Menu
Log in
Register