Skimmed the article and went straight to the comments - highlights include:it’s obvious that her book is not just for “young people” - it’s for (leaning upper, certainly not lower) middle class young people. Talking as if people work 24/7 and take jobs as Deliveroo/Uber drivers because they want to hustle...it’s because lots of young people have to if they want to afford to live, let alone have a basically acceptable quality of life. It’s also because it’s getting increasingly hard for us to get good jobs.
I really need to read the page she didn’t post, but with the “influencing/instagramming is hyper-fulfilling” thing, it feels like she’s trying to present the issue as actually being about Gen Z being innovative and finding cool new Instagram jobs, rather than exploitation in the structure of “conventional” jobs
“Instagramming” isn’t a reliable route out of conventional work as there is a huge glass ceiling for a lot of people. You need to have free time and financial security to start in influencing, which Grace seems to forget that a lot of people don’t have, even though she says that everyone is working 24/7. You need to be picked up by a bigger organisation usually, like Gleam or Love Island or Gymshark. You also need to be conventionally attractive and young, especially as a woman. It’s not an accessible escape from exploitative work structures and shouldn’t be presented as a viable alternative to them
View attachment 522623
"So all you need to make it is hard graft, a nice bottom and a loaded family?"
"No mention of the massive trust fund"
"Looks more like soft porn"
"A real riches to riches story - it brought a tear to my eye to see how someone from a wealthy family with lots of inherited wealth made it against the odds" (my personal fave)