Possibly because she engaged with him and so it doesn't look like its unwanted attention. Her replies don't read like someone who was all that interested in him sexually so I wonder if it started off as an exchange between two friendly work colleagues that he took advantage of.I still can’t understand how he was cleared of inappropriate behaviour, were these texts and messages not submitted as evidence?
Shows flaws in the way the industry allow/condone this type of behaviour or how much power he has because of his wealth and experience so he can’t possibly be guilty?