Gender Discussion #96

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I realised that it was another one of their linguistic sleights-of-hand.

It started of as "trans women" with "trans is a prefix" - when this became commonly accepted (and when they realised that a prefix 99 times out of 100 turns the word into its opposite (happy/unhappy, agree/disagree etc) and that they were admitting they were men, suddenly we got a space between "trans" and "women".

"Trans" then morphed from a prefix into an adjective. All of a sudden "trans" women were a type of women - like tall women, thin women, black women, clever women, ANGRY women (which an awful lot of us were long before then). They complained whenever the "trans" was added to the "women" as a prefix - even though that was what THEY had claimed initially ("It's a prefix. It's from science" etc) because they wanted to blur that distinction.

It's a little thing, but that's why I always use "transwomen" and never leave the gap. Because they aren't women. They are the OPPOSITE of women. They are men. I used to get piled on on Twitter for this before I got banned, which shows how determined they were to claim womanhood.

This linguistic legerdemain is deliberate and calculated.

As you so rightly say - psychological tricks - all the time. One of the reasons that they won't define anything - they don't want to be held to any definition because they never know when they'll want to change it.

Edit - spelling
Completely agree. It's why I always use trans-identified male, TIM etc. - keeping the word 'woman' completely separated from them.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
let’s be real, trans ‘rights’ aren’t human rights, they’re human WANTS. They WANT access to spaces designated to the opposite sex. They WANT access to sterilising and disfiguring medical care, where there is no medical need. They WANT to control how others feel, speak and think about them.

The last is more complicated, but the rest are not rights that any of us are entitled to. An anorexic does not have the ‘right’ to starve herself to death - in a truly free/liberal/whatever society we could argue that she is free to do so, but not to the point where the state enables her mental illness. As a mentally ill person, she does have the right to appropriate care for her mental illness which, funnily enough, isn’t facilitating her self-starvation.

‘Trans rights’ completely obscure the intended purpose of human rights. Yes, a trans identified person has the same rights the rest of us do - freedom from harassment, persecution, discrimination etc. I can even concede that those who have transitioned may require additional discrimination protections in a protected characteristics sense- the toothpaste is out of the tube, so to speak.

But they didn’t have the ‘right’ to make themselves that way. It was a choice, and one they should be encouraged to take responsibility for. It’s how you help mentally unwell people get better.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 38
Completely agree. It's why I always use trans-identified male, TIM etc. - keeping the word 'woman' completely separated from them.
I’ve probably said this before but when I was out on the streets getting people to sign up for the GRA consultation with Fair Play for Women, nearly all the people I spoke to thought that transwomen = women who identify as trans; not men who identify as women.

The skewing of language was calculated justify as much as TRAs got through self ID in Ireland under the shield of abortion rights. Such sick people sneaking in the right to trash women’s spaces under a law reform which is about saving women’s lives.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 36
Women should have never been part of the trans label the same as CIS nothing to do with the word Women.💚🤍💜
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 33
Screenshot_20250906-200112_X.jpg

Why does this violent, abusive man keep posting like this?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 34
Julie Bindel has been thrown out of Pride in Surrey 😡.

this is so tiring and I only watch these women fight for us. I don’t know how they find the strength!

It reminded me that I saw the councillor Mandy Clare (who got kicked out of Chester Storyhouse during a women’s event that included TIMs) was arrested and charged for an incident at Winsford Pride a few months ago.



It could be another Glinner situation but I am a bit cautious about blindly supporting someone just because they are GC. But this is what another councillor who was there said about it

IMG_0980.jpeg
IMG_0983.jpeg
 
  • Wow
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 24
Julie Bindel has been thrown out of Pride in Surrey 😡.

I am baffled that a private individual can be thrown out of a public park, vested in the local authority and paid for through council tax and other public funding, by other private individuals who have no greater interest in Stoke Park than Julie Bindel.

I don't care how many security vests and bits and bobs the boys were wearing. They had no right to tell her to leave on any basis.

I hope she demands an apology at least from the dozy MP who ordered her out.
She should ask on what authority the MP was acting - and the same of the security boys.
Visiting Stoke Park - Guildford Borough Council

In fact Julie Bindel should have said 'No! I am asking you to leave ' which would have been equally as mistaken but very funny.
I note the Park was a donation to Guildford as the lung of the town.

Stoke Park is a 52-hectare (130-acre) park on the edge of the town centre of Guildford, Surrey, England donated to Guildford by the Lord Onslow in 1925 with the express wish that it "remain for all time a lung of the town".[3
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 23
This is Fred "Freda" Wallace. A deeply sinister, calculating and dangerous man IMO.

🤬 This Tarquin bully is going to pick on the wrong person one day and come off worse. He seems to think he has a right to intimidate women. Personally I think it's about time he was reported to the police for harassment. Some time spent in jail would be good for him.
His parents should be deeply ashamed of raising a son like that.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 22
🤬 This Tarquin bully is going to pick on the wrong person one day and come off worse. He seems to think he has a right to intimidate women. Personally I think it's about time he was reported to the police for harassment. Some time spent in jail would be good for him.
His parents should be deeply ashamed of raising a son like that.
I really hope he loses his case against Glinner (TBH, I'm not hopeful). He needs to start having some real-world legal consequences for his constant harassment. It will either make him wake up, or potentially, it will make him even more rabid!

He's a walking red flag. As are the older men who are using him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 25
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.