Gender discussion #70

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Why do you think that is though. This has been an issue since Semenya in 2009 but we've been shouted down, abused, slandered etc to shut us up.
The cynic in me says because many people, including women, don't care about women. Be kind, what's it's got to do with you, why are you so worried about something that doesn't effect you. That's what we're told day in day out. It's taken seeing a woman getting the head punched off her by a man to wake people up the wider problem of gender ideology.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 27


This is genuinely scary. This is a huge organisation just lying to us and ignoring science and hardly anybody in media or government is challenging it.
They're never going to let Khelif be exposed. He'll probably retire.
"That XX and XY are a clear distinction of men and women...this is not true any more"

This is a prime example of outright misinformation, presented as fact, by an unqualified person, with a particular axe to grind.
Unfortunately, despite the huge leaps in technology and scientific discovery in the last few years, the general public are largely scientifically illiterate. Lots of perfectly intelligent people have no idea that the Earth goes round the Sun, or why a day is 24 hours long. Ask anyone their star sign and they'll know it, but ask them how lightning is created, why the sky is blue, or how the touchscreen on their phone works, and you'll get a blank look. (I'm not being twatty about this, I'd struggle to answer these myself! 🤣)
But stating that human sex is "non-binary" is absolute rubbish, for the context of sporting categories. Mithering on about the tiny number of people who have chromosomal disorders, or bloody clownfish, seahorses and so on, is just deliberately muddying the waters. Those female boxers have been physically assaulted by men in a sporting arena, they should sue the a off the IOC. Get Bach on the stand and make him provide proof that all of the "women" boxers in the 2024 Olympics were female. We'll see how his superior scientific knowledge really stacks up 😡😡😡
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 44
I’ve just seen someone I know label Khelif’s win as a feminist win. I just don’t even know where to start!
 
  • Angry
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 41
I must have too much time on my hands but I’m sick of the MRA lot bleating “what about Michael Phelps” as if it’s some kind of gotcha.

these are the results of the men’s and women’s 200 medley relay in Rio.

MP beat his nearest competitor by almost 2 seconds. Which admittedly is a lot in elite swimming.

The male who came last in the heats got a time over a second and a half faster than the woman who won the gold medal.

these people who bang on about Phelps and his advantage and compare it to this are either dishonest, stupid, or both.
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 30
The Michael Phelps argument is infuriating. Michael Phelps was competing against other men who were also genetically suited to swimming and had a similar build to him, even if not quite as 'perfect'. He wasn't competing against men who were significantly smaller and weaker than him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 40
The Michael Phelps argument is infuriating. Michael Phelps was competing against other men who were also genetically suited to swimming and had a similar build to him, even if not quite as 'perfect'. He wasn't competing against men who were significantly smaller and weaker than him.
Quite. He undoubtedly did have physiological advantages, but not unfair advantages of the ilk of men v women, able bodied v disabled etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
Quite. He undoubtedly did have physiological advantages, but not unfair advantages of the ilk of men v women, able bodied v disabled etc
Exactly. He was in a competition to find the best male swimmer and he won. Obviously his body was better suited to excelling at swimming than other male bodies but that's what made him the best male swimmer. That doesn't mean that men with DSD get to participate in the best female swimmer competition - there is no logic to that argument. Their testicles and male hormone levels don't make them better suited to swimming than the other competitors - they make them male.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
Why do you think that is though. This has been an issue since Semenya in 2009 but we've been shouted down, abused, slandered etc to shut us up.
I can only speak for myself but we all have so many issues to deal with, personally I have a neuro diverse child so have been fighting for diagnosis, support in school etc and most of my reading has tended to be around this and other issues directly effecting me. I have a parent dealing with mental health issues, there’s only so much we can take on if that makes sense so sometimes you have to choose your battles. But my point was this has highlighted it for more people and that’s a good thing.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
The Michael Phelps argument is infuriating. Michael Phelps was competing against other men who were also genetically suited to swimming and had a similar build to him, even if not quite as 'perfect'. He wasn't competing against men who were significantly smaller and weaker than him.
Well exactly. I've got short legs so was always at a disadvantage in running and high jumping events at school compared to the taller girls. Does that mean that I think women with long legs should be penalised or that they're not women 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
Well exactly. I've got short legs so was always at a disadvantage in running and high jumping events at school compared to the taller girls. Does that mean that I think women with long legs should be penalised or that they're not women 🙄
Women with long legs aren't women they are crane flies (daddy long legs) clearly 🫠
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 28
Why do you think that is though. This has been an issue since Semenya in 2009 but we've been shouted down, abused, slandered etc to shut us up.
Sorry to quote you again but i also think in 2009 social media wasn’t the same, look at it now when someone goes missing like Nicola Bulley or Jay Slater and social media erupts so you see it everywhere, no one set up missing people groups so they could all discuss conspiracy theories we just left it to the police. Now there’s more opportunity to find information, talk to others about it, learn about the issue. Sadly there is still so much false information sharing but at least people can research and come to their own conclusion. I have seen a lot of people saying the same as us on each post about IK, it’s the IOC that need to act though and I think more athletes standing up to them and saying it needs to stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
I was never kind in the first place.
Quoting my own post like a head, but it's true.
When I first saw the TWAW stuff, maybe 7/8 years ago I honestly thought it was made up nonsense, some David Icke type conspiracy theory, it couldn't possibly be true, so I mainly ignored it, and it was the Man Friday protests at Hampstead Ponds weirdly that made me realise it was happening.

I didn't know enough to comment, and don't live in England, never mind London or Hampstead, but I started following it.

As time went on I learned more, but I'm not great at articulating what I mean, so it was great when JKR basically said exactly what I think in her first essay.

As we all now know, that's a "nazi/bigot/racist/fascist/putin lover/stamps on kittens", things to say.
That's when I realised there is no middle ground, you accept TWAW or you get all the names.
So, no, I was never kind, I did discover there isn't a middle ground, so maybe that was my, "peaking"?
It did take me two more years to say it publicly though because I was scared of losing friends.
I did lose friends, I now don't care.
I'll never Wheesht.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 33
Sorry to ask a daft question, but what is the Michael Phelps thing? He's a man competing in men's events against other men? Why is anyone comparing him competing against other men, to women competing against men? Has he got tiny propellers hidden in his boy bits?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 21
Sorry to ask a daft question, but what is the Michael Phelps thing? He's a man competing in men's events against other men? Why is anyone comparing him competing against other men, to women competing against men? Has he got tiny propellers hidden in his boy bits?
It's stupid people basically.
He competed very fairly as he was allowed to, as are tall basketball players which also keeps coming up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Quoting my own post like a head, but it's true.
When I first saw the TWAW stuff, maybe 7/8 years ago I honestly thought it was made up nonsense, some David Icke type conspiracy theory, it couldn't possibly be true, so I mainly ignored it, and it was the Man Friday protests at Hampstead Ponds weirdly that made me realise it was happening.

I didn't know enough to comment, and don't live in England, never mind London or Hampstead, but I started following it.

As time went on I learned more, but I'm not great at articulating what I mean, so it was great when JKR basically said exactly what I think in her first essay.

As we all now know, that's a "nazi/bigot/racist/fascist/putin lover/stamps on kittens", things to say.
That's when I realised there is no middle ground, you accept TWAW or you get all the names.
So, no, I was never kind, I did discover there isn't a middle ground, so maybe that was my, "peaking"?
It did take me two more years to say it publicly though because I was scared of losing friends.
I did lose friends, I now don't care.
I'll never Wheesht.
I thought it was a kind of niche thing that nobody really believed. I was shocked when I found out that Lia Thomas was actually competing against women and people really believe that twaw.
I guess it is still a niche thing that most people don't believe. The trouble is that the people who do believe are in positions of power and influence. It's been allowed to get totally out of hand because it wasn't nipped in the bud.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
Sorry to ask a daft question, but what is the Michael Phelps thing? He's a man competing in men's events against other men? Why is anyone comparing him competing against other men, to women competing against men? Has he got tiny propellers hidden in his boy bits?
I saw a documentary years ago and basically he’s a perfect swimmer - he has a naturally large lung capacity, really flexible joints and so on. But he’s not pretending to be a woman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26
I thought it was a kind of niche thing that nobody really believed. I was shocked when I found out that Lia Thomas was actually competing against women and people really believe that twaw.
I guess it is still a niche thing that most people don't believe. The trouble is that the people who do believe are in positions of power and influence. It's been allowed to get totally out of hand because it wasn't nipped in the bud.
The trouble is that the people who do believe are in positions of power and influence.

On the contrary. The people who truly do believe are troubled children who don't know any better. Even people who are genuinely dysphoric are well aware which sex they are - they just can't cope with their sexed bodies, for whatever reason.

The people who are in positions of power and influence are deliberately pushing an agenda they profess to believe in, but know is false, because they are gaining more power and influence - and a hell of a lot of money in many cases - and a large proportion of them are able to publicly indulge fetishes that they once wouldn't have dared bring out into the light of day. (And anyone who complains is transphobic/ bigoted, whatever.)
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 24
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.