Bloody hell. Hiding in plain sight, without even trying very hard to hide.
Bloody hell. Hiding in plain sight, without even trying very hard to hide.The bloke who's post this is has already been investigated for crimes against his own children. It's pretty common knowledge in the local area. The children were removed by SS at the time. He will deny it but he's slipped up before in videos implying he's on a register.
He's as AGP as they get.
No one should have to live in fear because they are female. Women should not have women only spaces taken away from them.Just seen
The one with the long hair looks very young. Almost like a 12 yr old boy wearing a wig. Just sayingThis is just ridiculous and would be laughable if it didn’t have such significant consequences.
The penis doesn’t make you a man but the long hair makes you a woman? Ok then.
View attachment 2941255
I'm from a similar area which overwhelmingly voted leave in the EU Referendum and which, for the first time in years (if ever!) are voting Conservative.I know I’m repeating myself over and over again, but why are the Labour Party continually banging this as their ‘we’re not like those nasty conservatives’ drum, when there’s a major CoL crisis they could be foregrounding in order to garner votes?
Why did they forsake working-class concerns in preference to identity politics?
I’m from a part of the country that is characterised by an abundance of failing ex-mining villages that currently have little in terms of options for regeneration or even survival. What the fuck is the current incarnation of the Labour Party doing for them?
I fear there’s something more at play in this picture: given how petite the long-haired person is, they are most likely not an adult transwomen (who would, in most cases, be of a similar size/build to the adult male figure).I really, really want to know what the difference is between ‘science’ and ‘biology’.
Is this an embarrassingly dumb attempt to claim that biology is a social rather than a scientific construct?
---
I fear there’s something more at play in this picture: given how petite the long-haired person is, they are most likely not an adult transwomen (who would, in most cases, be of a similar size/build to the adult male figure).
Child-sized, one might suggest?
As many have predicted, here and elsewhere, there is clear lobbying to get P/MAP covered under the alphabet umbrella. Normalising a sexual image featuring a couple with clear adult/child size differentiation would certainly be useful in that respect.
Oh god I hadn’t thought of that.I fear there’s something more at play in this picture: given how petite the long-haired person is, they are most likely not an adult transwomen (who would, in most cases, be of a similar size/build to the adult male figure).
Child-sized, one might suggest?
As many have predicted, here and elsewhere, there is clear lobbying to get P/MAP covered under the alphabet umbrella. Normalising a sexual image featuring a couple with clear adult/child size differentiation would certainly be useful in that respect.
That's what we will get , and lots more, if people vote Labour in the next election. Women will be sunk.Why do Labour have an officer for ‘Women and LGBT”? Unless I’m missing something, it’s as if they’ve lumped everyone who isn’t a straight, biological man in together. I dont think women’s issues are related to LGB issues and neither are related to trans issues.
Of course, we all know that trans issues will dominate over women and LGB.
Yes. It's tied in with getting at young boys & ultimately trying to change the age of consent to 12.The one with the long hair looks very young. Almost like a 12 yr old boy wearing a wig. Just saying
yeah it didn’t register with me either. ive spent too long on the louise Thompson thread where she and her partner constantly refer to how tiny she is and huge he isOh god I hadn’t thought of that.
I’ve seen so many cartoon women-with-dicks looking like sweet, delicate paragons of femininity, the childlike proportions in that drawing didn’t even register with me
Considering the Labour leader has only ever been a white man I’m surprised they don’t just have an ‘other’ category: I don’t know what modern Labour stands for.Why do Labour have an officer for ‘Women and LGBT”? Unless I’m missing something, it’s as if they’ve lumped everyone who isn’t a straight, biological man in together. I dont think women’s issues are related to LGB issues and neither are related to trans issues.
Of course, we all know that trans issues will dominate over women and LGB.
I think that's a piss takeI saw this comment on that Annaliese Dodds' twitter...is this satire or not because I looked at the other posts and I can't tell...
I think (hope) that the ‘shart’ in the username points towards satire, but you’re right - who can tell?I saw this comment on that Annaliese Dodds' twitter...is this satire or not because I looked at the other posts and I can't tell...
Dr S Hart is a parody accountI saw this comment on that Annaliese Dodds' twitter...is this satire or not because I looked at the other posts and I can't tell...
I was expecting it to be like Dame Katy Denise Twitter but it was difficult to tell. I assume that no one would publicly declare that "no one wants a gay child"...but my god these days who can tell what people will post!I think that's a piss take
I take it her meeting with LGB Alliance the other day had no impact then? Or maybe them publicly thanking her on X meant she received enough backlash to make her double down to prove her allegiance to the cult. Who knows? Either way, not interested in voting for her. I really hope the Greens split the vote and make Labour wake up.Just seen
“I won’t play a straight female role - it would be taking incredulity into a whole new dimension”I take it her meeting with LGB Alliance the other day had no impact then? Or maybe them publicly thanking her on X meant she received enough backlash to make her double down to prove her allegiance to the cult. Who knows? Either way, not interested in voting for her. I really hope the Greens split the vote and make Labour wake up.
On another note, I just saw this in the Telegraph written with no sense of irony. Where to start? Izzard referred to as she/her throughout the article.
View attachment 2941839
So he doesn't want to do intimate scenes with another manI take it her meeting with LGB Alliance the other day had no impact then? Or maybe them publicly thanking her on X meant she received enough backlash to make her double down to prove her allegiance to the cult. Who knows? Either way, not interested in voting for her. I really hope the Greens split the vote and make Labour wake up.
On another note, I just saw this in the Telegraph written with no sense of irony. Where to start? Izzard referred to as she/her throughout the article.
View attachment 2941839
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?