Not progressive enough. Should have gone with "birth-givers of colour"
Surely they shouldn't use the word 'maternal'? Isn't that transphobic? After all men can die giving birth as well. Sigh.
Someone probably spent days trying to find and alternative word to maternal before finally giving upSurely they shouldn't use the word 'maternal'? Isn't that transphobic? After all men can die giving birth as well. Sigh.
I’m vaguely surprised the person isn’t actually identifying as a cat.View attachment 1376204
My social media feed keeps recommending this photo and I have no idea why. Not seeing the man in this picture, is he in the background?
It absolutely does. It also means there are many more feeling the same as you; you may not know who they are, but you obviously aren't aloneNot worth the risk where I work and I can't afford to lose my job. Sounds cowardly I know but I'm going to save it until I'm ready to leave.
We have a company intranet. Whenever there are posts about racial equality loads of people 'like' the comments. There was a trans supporting post put on there recently and only one person in the whole organisation 'liked' it.
I think that actually speaks volumes
Ive just glanced at their Twitter bio out of
That person is probably glad to be rid of the poster. As everyone else would be. Who needs an attention seeking narcissist in their life?
Unfortunately not going along with it, or at least pretending to, can literally get you fired.If you live in a country where you have freedom of speech and freedom of belief, then you don't have to go along with the transcult. You can just say 'I don't believe in Trans Ideology'. No one can make you believe it. Especially since it is a load of codswallop. Far closer to a religious belief than a scientific theory. Why should we be forced to believe someone elses religious belief?
If you're in the UK then firing you would be illegal. We have the right to be gender critical.Unfortunately not going along with it, or at least pretending to, can literally get you fired.
OK maybe not fired. But certainly disciplined. I remember being pulled aside for a "quiet word in my ear" when I point blank refused to were a silly wig and have a group photo taken to "celebrate" IDAHOBIT Day. I wasn't displaying company values apparently which were about inclusion.If you're in the UK then firing you would be illegal. We have the right to be gender critical.
They actually can't discipline you either because if they did and you felt that you had to leave then that would be constructive dismissal. Obviously you have to work there so rocking the boat isn't an option until you decide you really want out but please remember that you absolutely do have the law on your side despite what some people would have you believeOK maybe not fired. But certainly disciplined. I remember being pulled aside for a "quiet word in my ear" when I point blank refused to were a silly wig and have a group photo taken to "celebrate" IDAHOBIT Day. I wasn't displaying company values apparently which were about inclusion.
It ended in a farcical conversation about the difference between not celebrating and not including.
Illegal, but how many of us can afford an employment tribunal?If you're in the UK then firing you would be illegal. We have the right to be gender critical.
Sad photo. Also a staggeringly obvious woman's body. The most obviously female arm and hand. Somehow the face being covered makes it all the more obvious. Who do they think they're kidding?View attachment 1376204
My social media feed keeps recommending this photo and I have no idea why. Not seeing the man in this picture, is he in the background?
She has a very feminine face too, and she still wears feminine jewellery and accessories. No doubt she would describe herself as a gender nonconforming man ... oh dearSad photo. Also a staggeringly obvious woman's body. The most obviously female arm and hand. Somehow the face being covered makes it all the more obvious. Who do they think they're kidding?