Bleeders!? What the actual duck?! How completely dehumanising!
Bleeders!? What the actual duck?! How completely dehumanising!
Funny how people are picking up on this from this ad, but every period underwear company out there are already using this dehumanising language and have been for a while. Sure there are other places where this bonkers avoidance of the word woman is prevalent. But like I said the other week, Gillette is still the best a man can get.Bleeders!? What the actual duck?! How completely dehumanising!
I heard an ad on the radio about checking for prostate cancer which went along the lines of ‘Are you a MAN? If so, check your MAN parts like Stephen Fry did, because he is also a MAN’But like I said the other week, Gillette is still the best a man can get.
Of course we don’t fool about with language for men (pun intended). We do it with women because we are KIND and ACCOMMODATING. And are used to pandering to men and letting them tell us what to do.I heard an ad on the radio about checking for prostate cancer which went along the lines of ‘Are you a MAN? If so, check your MAN parts like Stephen Fry did, because he is also a MAN’
I’m paraphrasing, obviously, but there was none of your ejaculators or prostate havers here.
Dehumanising is the only word I can think of too. How disgusting. They couldn't even bring themselves to use "people who have periods" because some jumped up they/them blue haired nightmare would get offended at the word "period", no doubt about it.Bleeders!? What the actual duck?! How completely dehumanising!
I haven’t read the report as I know I would find it too much - how humiliating for the poor girl! What were they expecting to find? What is wrong with the bleeping police?I've just been reading the full report. They made her remove her sanitary towel, bend over and spread her buttocks, with just the two policewomen in the room with her, no other appropriate adult, and her parents were not informed. That poor, poor girl.
bleeping hell!!! Just imagine how horrific that would be! OmgI've just been reading the full report. They made her remove her sanitary towel, bend over and spread her buttocks, with just the two policewomen in the room with her, no other appropriate adult, and her parents were not informed. That poor, poor girl.
The comments on that post are warming my heart though. We need more women kicking back on this tit!! The young ones are mostly all captured though. It’s so sad.Dehumanising is the only word I can think of too. How disgusting. They couldn't even bring themselves to use "people who have periods" because some jumped up they/them blue haired nightmare would get offended at the word "period", no doubt about it.
I feel like women wouldn't be QUITE so annoyed if it seemed like the company/CEO was trying to do anything OTHER than pander. Using "bleeders" just seems like such an obvious way to get in the good graces of the TRA crew, so it feels insulting AND disingenuous.The comments on that post are warming my heart though. We need more women kicking back on this tit!! The young ones are mostly all captured though. It’s so sad.
To give credit to yoppie, I can see from their other posts that they do mention women quite a lot. Other period underwear companies are much worse but I haven’t seen backlash. Apart from the dm’s from me that is![]()
Under any other circumstances, this would rightly be described as sexual assault.I've just been reading the full report. They made her remove her sanitary towel, bend over and spread her buttocks, with just the two policewomen in the room with her, no other appropriate adult, and her parents were not informed. That poor, poor girl.
Call me a cynic, but it almost feels like she was trolling by using that term.Sorry to go on about that yoppie post but a blue tick has entered the comments! Andi Oliver, the tv chef. She’s on the great British menu at the mo. Woo hoo go Andi!! I wonder if this will get picked up by the press. Let’s face it there have been stories about less
She’s even put it on her own stories!
Possibly. Lots of other companies have been saying bleeders for ages and there hasn’t been this kind of reaction. I hope it does start a discussion though, and companies actually listen to women and grow a backbone.Call me a cynic, but it almost feels like she was trolling by using that term.
She's pretty much going by the "there's no such thing as bad publicity" adage.
it could be or it could be their social media/marketing department is peopled with Stonewall disciples. Rather than focus on who is my target audience they have attempted to placate a tiny minority.Call me a cynic, but it almost feels like she was trolling by using that term.
She's pretty much going by the "there's no such thing as bad publicity" adage.
It does….that’s women like Willoughby with his cervix!Literally just seen an IG post using the words “ international womens day” and “people who menstruate” in the same sentence.
if you’re going to be “”inclusive”” make it make sense….
What company was it? I messaged Ohne ages ago about all the crazy words they use instead of women. No response. I’m considering emailing the Scottish government about the period shame tv advert. It’s so good until the very end with its 61% of young people experience period shame. Say GIRLS ffsIt does….that’s women like Willoughby with his cervix!
Not had a reply to my email to the sanitary towel company who’s advert said “young people” instead of girls.