Another man here. (Sorry for second post in one day!) Your position on women's spaces and sports is spot on.I'm a man (sorry) and I am trying to understand how to categorise my views. Since y'all are experts, and my attempt to reconcile my thoughts was not welcomed elsewhere on the internet, perhaps it is possible to find insight here.
A little background: I have spent my life surrounded by trans women, because every other nerd seems to transition eventually. Every time a nerd starts to grow their hair long it's a coin flip whether they're about to come out. I've known very normal trans women who live a normal life, trans women who are the most obscene sexual deviants, and every type of person. I have no preconceptions about trans women broadly, they're... just people with their idiosyncrasies like the rest of us.
I think gender is a social construct and the solution to transgender is not individual, but societal, we need to free people from the silly notion that gender means anything. Let people be people, masculine, feminine, whatever, who cares. The biological aspects of male and female deserve affordances (e.g: in medicine) but the social aspects can be done away with. Unfortunately, that's not a realistic change today, gender is deeply woven into our lives and society and so transgender people are inevitable. I accept transgender as something necessary today for some people to feel comfortable in our world. Maybe, someday, that will change.
The problem I have with transgender women (not transgender men) is that men are... men. The victims of sexual violence are women at the hands of men. Every woman has a lifetime of experiences and strategies that she lives according to for her safety. Every woman I know fears men in some capacity. Men do not fear women, I have never felt fear of a woman in my life. Allowing men into spaces reserved for women betrays everything that women have learned to keep themselves safe from men. The spaces are reserved for women because of men! How can we say trans women deserve access to spaces reserved for women while men (whether cis or not) are such a danger to women? Whether biology or socialisation or some cosmic reason beyond my understanding, male-at-birth people are so much more dangerous to female-at-birth people than female-at-birth people are.
So, to me, gender doesn't even seem that relevant in our current time, the issue is that as men we need to first build a world where women are safe from men, and only then do we earn the right to advocate for living our lives in a way that is most comfortable for us. People who want trans women to be able to live as women should be angry at men, not women, because segregated bathrooms and changing rooms and support groups are something that men are responsible for, we created the environment in which women feel safe only when surrounded by other cis women. A common point is that "trans women would be in danger if they went into men's bathrooms" but isn't that a problem for men to solve? Why are we advocating for women to carry that burden? Men might grape a trans woman in a men's bathroom so women must sacrifice their safety by allowing anyone into their spaces?
Another common argument I see from trans people is that there aren't any statistics that show trans women are dangerous, but that ignores that safety is all about making educated and informed decisions based on experiences. Arguing that women should forget about their lifetime of experiences with men and the safety strategies they've learned to deal with men, just because the man in question identifies as a woman, seems crazy. Women are often not even safe in their own home with their own man, why would the gender dysphoria of a man they don't even know make them safe? We (progressives) don't scream "not all men" at a woman when she crosses the road late at night to avoid a man, we understand why she is crossing the road, I am not offended if a woman crosses the road to avoid me. She isn't making a judgement about me personally, she doesn't know me, she's making a decision about her safety based on all men.
I'm a super liberal progressive woo woo kumbaya type and this is, like, the only subject where I think I break with the mainstream of my people. Every time I try to reconcile how I understand the subject, considering the experiences of the women in my life, I read about gender-critical feminism, and it just... seems pragmatic? And progressive? The gender-critical utopia is surely a world where everyone would be happy? The wikipedia page, at least, reads like it is obviously a progressive movement and a natural evolution of feminism. I've mostly been thinking of myself as gender critical nowadays but my question is, is that right? Are these the views of someone who is "gender critical"? is there a different category for this?
I see a lot of people say gender-critical is a dog-whistle for anti-trans, which I think is probably why I struggle to identify as gender-critical and keep searching for a better category. I do not consider myself anti-trans, I'm obviously not anti-trans, I have trans friends, I would happily date a trans person, I think trans people deserve to live a happy wonderful life on their own terms unencumbered by our silly gender binary, my personal experience of trans women has been nothing but positive... but I cannot conceive of advocating for their access to sex-segregated spaces at the expense of the safety and security of women. Maybe I just have to rip the plaster off and say I'm gender critical and deal with being called anti-trans.
Would I describe myself as anti trans? Probably.
Here's my reasoning:
I don't like pigeon-holing people. Don't fit in? Quirky? Bisexual? Same sex attracted? You must be "trans"!
The whole gender thing is crazy, there are supposedly more than a hundred! So many confused young people are being sold the snake oil of being told that they can become something that can never actually be. Then there are the fetishists.....
There is a point that women can, and do, wear what could be described as traditionally male clothes every day - so why couldn't a man wear dresses and skirts if he genuinely feels more comfortable in them? But he would still be a man.
Growing up, I was very quirky and eccentric and most certainly didn't "fit in", neither was I masculine - quite the opposite (although I'm not gay). I think that I may have felt, in the many lonely and despairing moments in my teenage life, that the trans movement would have appealed to me. Not dressing or pretending to be a woman, but here were others who didn't belong.
But ultimately, we can only ever be "us". We can change our names, dress differently, or whatever - but inside, we are the same. Our tastes and likes (music, food, etc) remain the same. Our attitudes, our memories remain the same.
Helen Webberly is almost right - the person we are is in our brain, and we cannot change that.
I hope that makes sense. (Apologies for the me rail).