archived 27 Nov 2025 23:31:49 UTC
archive.ph
"It has now emerged in the clinical protocol for the study that the children will be asked to complete a gender identity questionnaire. “In this measure, gender identity is defined as someone’s internal sense of self,” the document explains.
The children will be asked “what best describes” their gender identity and given a series of options to tick including “definitely” a boy or girl, “mainly” a boy or girl, “neither a boy or girl”, “not sure” and “none of the above”.
In addition, those over 12 years old will be asked about “gender identity labels” and again given a range of descriptions to tick.
These include “cisgender”, “transgender”, “non-binary”, “agender”, “genderfluid”, “genderqueer”, “two spirit” and “other”.
Gender-critical health practitioners said it showed that the study was already displaying a bias towards “gender affirmatory ideology”.
Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and co-chairman of the Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender, a group of clinicians concerned about the rise of gender ideology in healthcare, said that the “labels” being presented to children were ideological in themselves.
She said: “It’s absolutely ridiculous. It shows that the whole trial is imbued with gender affirmatory ideology. What this question will do is reinforce the ideology in the eyes of the children.
“They shouldn’t make any suggestions — the question should just be open. The questionnaire should be as neutral as possible because a scientific trial should be neutral, not ideological.”
Irvine was particularly scathing of the use of the term “two spirit” in the questionnaire.
This phrase is considered a contemporary umbrella term for indigenous North Americans who identify as having both a masculine and a feminine spirit, fulfilling a third gender role in their communities.
It was coined in 1990 at a Native American gay and
les conference in Winnipeg, Canada, and has since entered LGBT vernacular.
“It will be confusing and most kids won’t even know what it means,” Irvine said.
“Questions should also be clear and clearly understood, so the study fails in that respect.”
Sue Evans, a psychotherapist and former clinical nurse specialist at the now defunct Tavistock children’s gender identity clinic (Gids), agreed that the use of the term “two spirit” in the study smacked of gender ideology.
She said: “The two spirit child idea is traditionally a Native American one where a child is raised in a non-gendered way.
“This idea has been transferred in an ideological way and one has to ask the relevance of this question here in the UK NHS study.”"