For someone who made law their entire schtick it's ironic she was "okay" at it.I was a bit weirded out at that comment, not gonna lie. Not everybody can be the best at their job anyway??? As long as you do what you're supposed to do, there's no need to be the absolute best at what you do. It's a very toxic mindset to have, in any aspect of your life, and one that's quite immature imo.
And posting her undies on a public platform for all her colleagues and employers to see.It's an interesting point you make she could have been 'managed' out of the team and placed in this new area. It happens all the time when companies can't just sack somebody they manage them out instead by doing things like this.
I wonder if this could also explain the sort of baiting I think she's been doing over the past year or so where she would be dressing inappropriately etc. Maybe things were going south at that point and Eve was intentionally being awkward as some sort of passive aggressive resistance.
We'll see how long she lasts in her new role. If she's gone from there in a short period then I think we can start to add more weight to this.
I mean tbf not working 12 hour days probably helps with having the time to do things she actually enjoys - but yeah, I think it's a stepping stone that allowed her to safely get out of the meat grinder of corporate law, and she'll move on fairly soon.Eve: I JUST REALLY NEEDED SOMETHING TO USE MY CREATIVE ENERGY!!!
Also Eve: Er…decides to work in contract automation….
Yeah, I think it definitely depends on the area of law/the firm. Certainly going into a court room or meeting a very traditional client when dressed casually would be a no-no. But in the City, on a day to day basis, it's got way more casual over the years. You'll struggle to find a younger guy wearing a tie for example. Apart from the midriff exposure (lol) what Eve wears wouldn't look out of place in my office. I think people have an image of law firms - especially City ones - which is a bit outdated. As I said, I think Links will be proud of Eve - she is a great ambassador for them. The job market at the top end of law is insane, mainly thanks to US firms coming to London and paying eye- watering amounts. Firms are cranking up their salaries constantly and the competition to retain talent is fierce. Having someone who promotes the firm as a cool place to work will be super useful for their recruitment efforts.Maybe it's the type of law? I worked in Legal Aid and we always had to dress pretty formally.
Aah thanks so much, think your summary was definitely way more entertaining and insightful than watching that video could ever have been.I watched most of it. She should just retire from YouTube already. It's much less tasteless than the other one purely because it's such a stupid case surrounding the petty fight between two famous-for-no-reason "celebrities" and nobody died this time. But it's just more of Eve's tired, talentless, cash-grab bullshit.
View attachment 1361730
Almost the entire video has on-screen ads for Fiver, along with a tonne of intrusive, incredibly cheap and amateurish animations. If this is the best Eve could find on Fiver, it doesn't exactly sell the platform well.
Eve spends the whole video obnoxiously flapping her hands around a lot while not saying anything new, anything of merit and just recycles content from other sources. All for a video about a fluff story that's old news.
She's somehow left it too late to talk about the case when it was trending and relevant, but didn't wait a few weeks until the verdict was announced to discuss the complete story. It's so sloppily constructed.
I don't really know what the point in any of what she's doing now is. She's paying other people to do all her work for her, so you would expect some new measure of quality or substance, but the end result is still so wafer-thin, lazy and half-assed. She also doesn't bring anything to the table at all. She offers no legal perspective beyond that which anyone who'd looked up the Wikipedia entry for 'defamation' could also provide. In fact, she seems to be Googling this shit in real time while filming and reading scripted information put together by her paid researcher for the most basic shit. Her input is basically: "Here's a recap of the case as found via Google. Who knows what will happen with the verdict, but it'll be interesting to see. Follow me on social media."
It's kind of easy to see why she pivoted away from wanting to practice law so quickly - she's trying real hard to be cool, charming and charismatic and coming across as pretentious, smarmy and condescending, but also can't seem to retain even basic legal information even though her entire studytube career was build around pushing toxic productivity and rote memorisation. If these videos are indicative of her courtroom prowess, research skills and on-the-spot thinking, then she must've been one shitty lawyer.
View attachment 1361658
She also spends a substantial chunk of the video talking to the camera in this pose for some reason. It looks so fucking awkward.
Is this another of her bizarre "business meeting" things? "I only give speeches when sitting on a desk in Converse. But when I'm on my practicing-the-law game, you know I'm changing things up by leaning across the desk to get all up in the judge and jury's grills. They won't know if you're awkwardly trying to seduce them or getting all confrontational and trying to psych them out, but either way, it will increase your chance of winning a case by 36%, 23% of the time!"
You could read the Wikipedia page on the case in 5 minutes and get more information than this 22 minute extended ad.
Thanks for the extra info on the Paris plansthey obviously didn’t book after the restrictions came out if she was posting about it like 3 weeks ago.
and she has posted with her mask on in videos and pictures, and posted when she got her vaccine (telling people to get theirs). i wouldn’t say she completely disregards the rule from a maskless picture when we don’t know if there’s strangers around her (i sure as hell take mine off to catch my breath if there’s no one near me).
the six figure salary seemed more than adequate compensation for the long hours…To be honest I don't blame her for leaving. I'm just finishing my law degree and I can't imagine doing that, the LPC, a masters and being expected to work the hours they work in big firms. It would kill most people's enthusiasm for the job
People who work in big law are typically quite conservative. Most of the Partners are males who tend to have an outdated image of women. Eve is quirky and loud, and therefore I believe her colleagues and seniors cringe at her videos. I seriously don't understand why she would want to work with such people. At this point, I think she's only in it for the money and prestige.Also, why was it that no one wanted to work with her?
Just my impression, but she never seemed to be driven by the pure need to be the best (unlike other studytubers like Ruby or Holly, who are clearly obsessed with it) and seemed to be very pragmatic about it during her studies (talking about her grades and achievements mostly in the context of employability etc.) and also in her recent video. So I - personally - wouldn't think it was a big factor in the decision beyond the general association between "being good at something" and "being passionate".I hope that didn't majorly factor into her choice to walk away from law i.e. if she couldn't be the best lawyer ever then she wanted to walk away. Totally relate to leaving if you aren't passionate anymore though.
Eve doesn’t live alone and I doubt the girlfriend does either. Very few people do at that age in London especially as she’s on a low wage art job.are either of them living alone? if so they’d be allowed in each other’s bubble, no?
I thought the same thing when she said that. She had a 'profile' though, coming in with her Youtube stuff so that probably worked against her in a sense that I bet she was scrutinised by her colleagues a lot more than a normal trainee.Good on her for deciding what she wants in life, interesting how she said she was "an okay lawyer, but wasn't the best". Makes me wonder if those FT comments about her not being known as very good at her job are accurate